That won’t work either.Yep. That's why the disruption needs to escalate to the point it hits profit.
That won’t work either.Yep. That's why the disruption needs to escalate to the point it hits profit.
I dont need to go existential. My view is subjective and it is my choice.yeh but what evidence do you have - what is there to support - your view?
History suggests it does.That won’t work either.
Yeah and you can't just erupt into that large scale disruption, it has to start somewhere.Yep. That's why the disruption needs to escalate to the point it hits profit.
Mostly, yes. Most Scientist seem to be of the opinion it is caused by us. Yes those that disagree seem to mostly be shills for oil comapny types.Who is saying that? Shills for the fossil fuels industry?
what about bombs? should they use bombs? that would cause some disruption.You could make the same argument against train strikes. Or any protest or campaign that causes any kind of disruption. The disruption is the whole point though.
What's your plan?That won’t work either.
I think we have some way to go before the campaign for warm homes reaches its military phase, personally.what about bombs? should they use bombs? that would cause some disruption.
Yep.Yeah and you can't just erupt into that large scale disruption, it has to start somewhere.
pockets, it started with pockets.What's your plan?
Bonus Q: Should we remove votes for women because of the disruption caused by the suffragettes?
Disruption only causes resentment and has little or no impact. Economics has impact. Money. Wealth. Capitalism
the same path. individual actions instead of class based collective action.I think we have some way to go before the campaign for warm homes reaches its military phase, personally.
What's your plan?
Bonus Q: Should we remove votes for women because of the disruption caused by the suffragettes?
Mostly, yes. Most Scientist seem to be of the opinion it is caused by us. Yes those that disagree seem to mostly be shills for oil comapny types.
Do one of them then.class based collective action.
Could you give an example?History suggests it does.
the same path. individual actions instead of class based collective action.
Are you sure about this? Climate change is a significant political hot potato atm, one that they're at least making efforts to appear to take seriously. Would that be the case without the various campaigns that have sprung up over the last few years, especially the ones that have caused disruption? I wouldn't have thought so. Just because an action doesn't have an immediate measurable impact doesn't mean it doesn't have an impact...Disruption only causes resentment and has little or no impact. Economics has impact. Money. Wealth. Capitalism.
Yes it is and I agree with it being the reason. However some Scientists, from what I remember, as I might have been putting my rollers in, still say it might be because of the Earths periodical changes. I like to be as objective as I can be, and not base things on my own opinion.The consensus from the experts is overwhelming. Anthropogenic climate change is as nailed-on a certainty as you can get in science.
Is this the 'sugragettes alienated the public and liberal capitalism would have given them the vote quicker if left alone' argument? I've only ever heard obvious twats and Tories come out with this one (which is obviously unchanged by your using it). Do you have proof of any kind?Did the suffragettes protests hasten or delay parliament extending votes to women?
Could you give an example?
i will when the opportunity arrives, or we collectively create that opportunity.Do one of them then.
This is indeed a problem with Insulate Britain.the same path. individual actions instead of class based collective action.
Yes it is and I agree with it being the reason. However some Scientists, from what I remember, as I might have been putting my rollers in, still say it might be because of the Earths periodical changes. I like to be as objective as I can be, and not base things on my own opinion.
I like to be as objective as I can be, and not base things on my own opinion.
The cost of meeting their demands has been projected at £18 Billion, a few dozen nuts with near zero public support is going to have to up its game to cause that much disruption.Yep.
If the "cost to business" caused by these protests starts to approach the cost putting in all that insulation I think we'd see them win pretty quickly afterwards.
Is this the 'sugragettes alienated the public and liberal capitalism would have given them the vote quicker if left alone' argument? I've only ever heard obvious twats and Tories come out with this one (which is obviously unchanged by your using it). Do you have proof of any kind?
look how het up people are got up during tube strikes, when only one side of the story appears in the mediaThis is indeed a problem with Insulate Britain.
Class based collective action would also cause disruption though. Look at how het up people get during tube strikes.
most historians have never studied or written about the period let alone the cause of votes for womenMost historians. Do your own reading.