butchersapron
Bring back hanging
subject to tribal hatred
You fuckin moron
Modernised, join the modernisers not the tribalisers. Join the good not bad. Pathetic. For a tory with half a brain i thought you'd see through that.
subject to tribal hatred
Can anyone find me a worse article than this?
(How much do people like Glover get paid for this 'free' shit anyway? The NUJ should have the pompous cunts cards)
Clegg looks perfectly at home with his public school buddy.
He started a Tory and will end a Tory.
I mean, they agree on so much - reducing benefits and expanding workfare, and...well, reducing benefits and expanding workfare. And don't forget about reducing benefits and expanding workfare.
What glorious day.
Yes, the one he wrote in February this year with the immortal line:
ineterestingly he has been Matthew Paris's (ex-tory mp now times columnist) partner for several years.
That i did not know. I've written before about his lib-dem stuff for the Guardian and why it shouldn't be in the news reporting section, esp during a GE before - it rarely is anymore . Seems even they caught up with him.
Faced with that, the temptation is to plump for weakness but the centre-left may be deluding itself if it thinks that a hung parliament will strengthen its cause. But a Cameron government held hostage by parliamentary arithmetic is likely to be a government under the sway of the right. The reason is simple. A Tory party whose centrist leader has failed to deliver the argument-clinching victory which was the only reason his secretly sceptical party ever stuck with him in the first place, will be looking towards a second election, possibly soon. His new MPs will not all be extremists. But they will need nerves of steel not to dart off to populist policies on things such as climate change.
In Australia, Abbott a new form of dog-whistling, me-first politics for the selfish in the age of climate change. It is playing well in Australia. It could play well in Britain, too. You might not love Cameron, but you should hope he succeeds. Come to Canberra, and you'll find out why.
The Arbiter Master General? Say it, don't make it so.'tribal' - discounted.
Grow up.
Not one for double jeopardy, then.You fuckin moron
Modernised, join the modernisers not the tribalisers. Join the good not bad. Pathetic. For a tory with half a brain i thought you'd see through that.
Whigs? How antiquarian!Maybe the party said they would and winked they wouldn't? Wouldn't that be off for the whigs to do? Maybe she wanted to wait and see if it was true, having already learnt of the lying way of the leadership?
Whigs? How antiquarian!
Can anyone find me a worse article than this?
the freedom to starve ehJust the sort of thing I expect to hear from an Objectivist.
rom wikipedia:
Nick Clegg was born in Chalfont St Giles in Buckinghamshire, in 1967, the third of four children. His father, Nicholas Clegg CBE, is chairman of United Trust Bank, and is a trustee of The Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation, where Ken Clarke was an adviser. Clegg’s paternal grandmother, Kira von Engelhardt, was a Russian Baroness whose German-Russian aristocratic family fled the Bolsheviks after the 1917 Russian Revolution. Clegg’s paternal grandfather, Hugh Anthony Clegg, was the editor of the British Medical Journal for 35 years. Clegg’s great-great-grandfather, the Russian nobleman Ignaty Zakrevsky, was attorney general of the imperial Russian senate. His great-great aunt was the writer, Baroness Moura Budberg.
Clegg was educated at the private Caldicott School at Farnham Royal in South Buckinghamshire, and later at the private Westminster School in London.
He spent a gap year as a skiing instructor in Austria before attending Robinson College, Cambridge in 1986. In 2008 it was reported that while at university, Clegg had joined the Cambridge University Conservative Association between 1986 and 1987, with contemporary membership records citing an “N. Clegg” of Robinson College. (At the time, Clegg was the only person of that name at Robinson.)
that is the worst thing ever
I was laughing at the Telegraph the other day but that definitely beats anything there hands down.
Reply With Quote
that is the worst thing ever
I was laughing at the Telegraph the other day but that definitely beats anything there hands down.
My campaign against that hateful Guardian rag is vindicated I feel.
William, it was really nothing.
Buy the Mirror.
Exactly. Clearly someone who didn't quite get Mazlow.the freedom to starve eh
Exactly. Clearly someone who didn't quite get Mazlow.
Would that be starving as in an estimated 3.1–7 million people in Stalin's collective farming program?
moon23 above certainly did, not sure the actual party did use it relation to that. More specifically he used it in support of an agenda that is based entirely in the right of an individual to whatever they want and wider society be damned - don't care if you're getting fucked over at least i don't have to show my ID ate tesco. A total separation of the issues. Thatcherism in action, and no wonder he's so shit hot excited about this new tory govt he worked his arse off for.
Playing the Stalin card really isn't helping your position here.
I just see things in different dialects, your the one who is so willing to reduce things to a simplistic and outdated notion of left or right that you are quite happy for people to live in a some kind of authoritarian nightmare so long as it follows a vaguely lefty economic policy.
I could see you as the one turning a blind eye to the Stasi so long as they occasionally fed you some propaganda about fighting capitalism and the state acting in the interests of the workers.
Clown. The only Stalinist on this thread voted Liberal.Would that be starving as in an estimated 3.1–7 million people in Stalin's collective farming program?
It's a good idea, isn't it, when you're in the wrong, to make up stuff?I just see things in different dialects, your the one who is so willing to reduce things to a simplistic and outdated notion of left or right that you are quite happy for people to live in a some kind of authoritarian nightmare so long as it follows a vaguely lefty economic policy.
Would that be starving as in an estimated 3.1–7 million people in Stalin's collective farming program?
I just see things in different dialects, your the one who is so willing to reduce things to a simplistic and outdated notion of left or right that you are quite happy for people to live in a some kind of authoritarian nightmare so long as it follows a vaguely lefty economic policy.
I could see you as the one turning a blind eye to the Stasi so long as they occasionally fed you some propaganda about fighting capitalism and the state acting in the interests of the workers.