Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Delyn MP Rob Roberts

I read somewhere that he appealed the decision of the standards committee, so it went to the independent panel
Not sure; seems like the complainant went to Parliament's Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme (ICGS) following the limp, whitewash 'probe' by the party that concluded nothing needed to be done.

I think Roberts appealed the ICGS finding, but that has failed, hence today's announcement. Given the finding it seems almost inexplicable that the Standards Committee would not want to have their say.
 
Delyn 1997-present.

clQltR6.png

I made this graph for nothing :(
 
The Government will move tonight a motion that will mean, in the future, any MP sanctioned by the same panel as Roberts would be subject to a Recall petition.
The amendment is from Labour, which aims to make the new provision retroactive, so as to put Roberts under the Recall procedure this year.

11. INDEPENDENT EXPERT PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND THE RECALL OF MPS ACT 2015 No debate after 7.00pm (Standing Order No. 9(6)) Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg

That— (1) the following Standing Order be made: “IEP recommendations for sanctions and the Recall of MPs Act 2015

(1) The Chair of the IEP shall send to the Chair and Members of the Committee on Standards and to the Clerk of that Committee any report from a sub-panel of the IEP which he has referred to the Clerk of the House under subparagraph (5)(d) of Standing Order No. 150A (Independent Expert Panel) and which contains a determination for a sanction that would, if made by the Committee on Standards, engage the provisions of the Recall of MPs Act 2015.

(2) Where a report has been sent to the Committee on Standards in accordance with paragraph (1) of this Order the Committee of Standards shall make a report to the House in relation to the Member named in that report, setting out a recommendation for a suspension equal to that recommended by the sub-panel to run concurrently with any sanction imposed as a result of the sub-panel’s determination.

(3) Reports under paragraph (2) must be made no later than on the third sitting day after the report of the IEP sub-panel is sent to members of the Committee on Standards, save that the day on which the report is sent shall not be counted in calculating this period.


(4) If the Committee on Standards is unable to meet within 3 sitting days, the Chair shall, if satisfied that the report from the IEP sub-panel has been sent to all members of the Committee, make the report to the House from the Committee required under paragraph (2).”


(2) The following amendments to Standing Orders be made:

(a) In Standing Order No. 149 (Committee on Standards), paragraph (1), at the end insert: “(c) in accordance with Standing Order No. (IEP recommendations for sanctions and the Recall of MPs Act 2015) to report to the House recommendations for sanctions to run concurrently with sanctions determined by a sub-panel of the IEP and implemented by the House.”

(b) In Standing Order No. 150D (Motions consequent on the ICGS), paragraph (1), at the end, insert: “( ) a motion under paragraph (1) of this Order includes a motion to implement a sanction recommended by the Committee on Standards under Standing Order No. (IEP recommendations for sanctions and the Recall of MPs Act 2015), or a motion to implement both such a sanction and a sanction determined by a subpanel of the IEP”.


Amendment (a)
(In the names of Keir Starmer, Thangam Debbonaire, Sir Alan Campbell, Angela Rayner, Shabana Mahmood, Anneliese Dodds)

At the end insert: “(3) The provisions of Standing Order (IEP recommendations for sanctions and the Recall of MPs Act) shall be applied in respect of any report from the Independent Expert Panel published before this Order is agreed which contains a determination for a sanction that, if it had been made by the Committee on Standards, would have engaged the provisions of the Recall of MPs Act 2015, save that, notwithstanding the provisions of that Standing Order, the sanction recommended by the Committee on Standards in such a case, shall be limited to 14 days and the provisions of Standing Order No. 45A shall not apply in respect of any suspension imposed in consequence of such a recommendation, and the provisions of the Standing Order shall be interpreted as if the day this Order is agreed had been the day on which the Report was sent to Members of the Committee on Standards in accordance with that Standing Order.”
 
I do wonder what would have happened if this occurred under May and her tiny majority. At a guess I'd say suspended until important votes than let back in quietly. Easy for Johnson and Mogg etc to give it the big one when they have the house majority they do.
 
Back
Top Bottom