But if you get silver, you haven't lost. You're still a winner. It's just gold medallists are the overall winners. So if the BBC are calling Armitstead a champion they mean one of the winners, ie a medallist.The champion is the one who wins the blinking thing. Whatever it is.
The runners up are the runners up. And well done to them, of course; they're pretty bloody good, too. But they sure as shit aren't the champion.
You're not the world record holder if some other sod does it faster than you, after all.
But if you get silver, you haven't lost.
The Olympics is different - THEY HAVE MEDALSI think if you told Man City that Man United were also Premier League Champions (by coming second) they might be a little pissed off.
Anyway. Semantics. Well done to all that breakway group. Was a fucking cool race.
She's a runner-up champion. Something no kiwi has managed.
I don't think there's any other Olympic event that the public can just wander up to, so people were really making use of it.
Only to gold. You've beaten loads of others and you get to stand on a podium and get a shiny medal while everyone bigs you up.No, you've lost.
The Olympics is different - THEY HAVE MEDALS
Maybe there has been. But I think it's great and more in keeping with the supposed Olympic spirit to refer to the medallists as champions.I doubt Steve Cram or Colin Jackson would see themselves as 'Olympic champions'. Bronze and silver medallists are generally referred to as Olympics medalists - not champions.
Unless there's some recent rebranding exercise.
But if you get silver, you haven't lost. You're still a winner. It's just gold medallists are the overall winners. So if the BBC are calling Armitstead a champion they mean one of the winners, ie a medallist.
Maybe there has been. But I think it's great and more in keeping with the supposed Olympic spirit to refer to the medallists as champions.