cupid_stunt
Chief seagull hater & farmerbarleymow's nemesis.
I still don't believe their figures.
No, me neither ..I still don't believe their figures.
Though my not believing their figures doesn't mean they didn't do a good job supressing the virus. I think their lockdown was more stringent than ours, and their contact tracing also sounds like it was a serious business.
Did you say millions for effect? or do you genuinely feel deaths will reach millions? At the moment the global death toll that is registered is 147,508 (from Coronavirus Update (Live): 2,196,569 Cases and 147,509 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer) I suppose we haven't yet seen large outbreaks in India, South America, Africa .. so there will be lots more to come.Just a shame they didn't apply it earlier they could have saved millions of lives worldwide.
Did you say millions for effect? or do you genuinely feel deaths will reach millions? At the moment the global death toll that is registered is 147,508 (from Coronavirus Update (Live): 2,196,569 Cases and 147,509 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer) I suppose we haven't yet seen large outbreaks in India, South America, Africa .. so there will be lots more to come.
Teaboy
Do you really think UK is trying to cook the books? I know the official figures they report at their 5pm briefing don't include care and home death, only being deaths in hospital but I believe they are totalling up care and home deaths ..
The government has already said 'we' will do really well to keep the deaths in the low 20 thousands. Who fancies a bet that is exactly what the official figures will say when all this is over?
I gather ONS figures show figures that can be compared to deaths 12 months ago which might indicate how many more people overall are dying now, from whatever reasons.I do. There is a question to consider though if you have limited testing who is more important a living person or a dead person? Quite frankly though they both need testing for obvious reasons.
I don't gamble .. I don't know which model gave that estimation of 20k but there are some which give higher figures also. Because I have been mainly interested in what is happening around the world I haven't been focussing on the UK, but I believe recent death rates of 800 plus a day does suggest we will pass 20k and might go on after that ..The government has already said 'we' will do really well to keep the deaths in the low 20 thousands. Who fancies a bet that is exactly what the official figures will say when all this is over?
Still on target for the various UK models' ~49K (in the first wave alone).They started off saying below 20,000. The figure has been largely absent recently.
I dont think they will even keep the hospital deaths below that, let alone the other deaths which get picked up by the ONS.
I gather ONS figures show figures that can be compared to deaths 12 months ago which might indicate how many more people overall are dying now, from whatever reasons.
The official counts will obviously (and appropriately) never include the deaths that will occur due to an overloaded health system being unable to respond to non-covid related matters or the results of additional poverty due to lockdown or people not being able to do certain critical things at certain points in their lives. But these are all consequences of the pandemic. Out of eight billion people on the planet, it’s not unreasonable to think that 0.02% of them might die early as a result of this, giving us millions of deaths.
Just a shame they didn't apply it earlier they could have saved millions of lives worldwide.
Nah. At some point they will have to add in the care home deaths. That would take it to nearly 20k right now. Looking at the patterns in other countries, even as new cases plummet, new deaths figures stay relatively high for a while due to those already infected/ill - some people don't die until well after a month from the date of infection.I do. There is a question to consider though if you have limited testing who is more important a living person or a dead person? Quite frankly though they both need testing for obvious reasons.
The government has already said 'we' will do really well to keep the deaths in the low 20 thousands. Who fancies a bet that is exactly what the official figures will say when all this is over?
Not on there, but New Zealand would also be plummeting down. Their total eradication policy appears to be on track.Interesting developments in this chart.
View attachment 207242
Not just China and South Korea exiting the growth line, also Australia and Hong Kong.
from: Covid Trends
As a side point, while we clearly need a little caveat regarding different testing regimes, I like this way of representing things because it removes time from the variables. It's really visually obvious where countries have managed a meaningful change.
I agree, I think the chart shows the key issue, I say bravo to the guy that came up with it.As a side point, while we clearly need a little caveat regarding different testing regimes, I like this way of representing things because it removes time from the variables. It's really visually obvious where countries have managed a meaningful change.
I don’t like wearing a mask. Glasses steam up, it feels hot, hard to breathe, no one can hear me when I’m asking for something in a shop.
I can see it being made compulsory in the uk too so buy some now if you can.
Panic buy! Panic buy!
In fairness as useless as our government is I can't see them making wearing a mask compulsory if you can't obtain one.
But 12 dormitories have been marked as isolation areas - no-one can enter or leave and workers are confined to their rooms, with meals delivered to them.
It's not clear how many of them currently share a room now during the quarantine period, but in 2015 the BBC visited a dormitory complex which housed 12 people per room.
Alex Au, of non-profit organisation Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2), told the BBC that there were sometimes as many as 17 people in a room.
Here it's been rather chaotic. You're supposed to be able to register and then have 5 free masks delivered a week. The system crashed and nobody I know got their masks. It's also now supposedly illegal to sell masks. I've got one crappy black material one that I wear repeatedly when I go to the shops.Panic buy! Panic buy!
In fairness as useless as our government is I can't see them making wearing a mask compulsory if you can't obtain one.
Others experts, including some colleagues of the model-makers, are even harsher. “That the IHME model keeps changing is evidence of its lack of reliability as a predictive tool,” said epidemiologist Ruth Etzioni of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, home to several of the researchers who created the model, and who has served on a search committee for IHME. “That it is being used for policy decisions and its results interpreted wrongly is a travesty unfolding before our eyes.”
They started off saying below 20,000. The figure has been largely absent recently.
I dont think they will even keep the hospital deaths below that,