It is a bombshellThe ridiculous easing of the rules over xmas is going to totally fuck us, isn't it?
NHS, virologists and other experts are desperate for lockdown, don't want people traveling and mixing over Winterval.
But the economy...
It is a bombshellThe ridiculous easing of the rules over xmas is going to totally fuck us, isn't it?
It's not even the economy, it's so Boris isn't the man who cancelled xmasIt is a bombshell
NHS, virologists and other experts are desperate for lockdown, don't want people traveling and mixing over Winterval.
But the economy...
Its a tragedy how badly the Welsh administration messed things up in recent months.
For a firebreak-based policy to stand any chance of working the first firebreak needs to be done nice and early, and then you need more than feeble mesures to come in when it ends, and then you need to be ready to do further short firebreakers at the correct time. Even then I dont know how well it would have worked, maybe if timed correctly even short firebreakers could work for managing an autumn situation and beginning winter without terribly high levels of community infection. Even then once winter has been around a while it is probably necessary to switch to a different policy, because otherwise so many firebreaks would probably be needed that the absurdity of switching things on and off every couple of weeks would probably be too great, and a single longer lockdown more appropriate.
Not the picture that was painted this morning in my Welsh town which has a bigger than average cohort of over 65s. Her other words? "We are desperate to get people in. They aren't coming in."
It is a bombshell
NHS, virologists and other experts are desperate for lockdown, don't want people traveling and mixing over Winterval.
But the economy...
Why do you think this?Those recent months stretch back quite a way and take in the education fiasco as well as general Covid management.
I am convinced, because I know how Welsh Labour work, as well as Welsh nationalism generally, that the firebreak was purely a political move, a desire to be seen to be doing something that England wasn't.
I don't think they have a clue. As I repeatedly refer back, take some time to read the back to school guidance for September. The guidance that totally trashed facemasks, going so far as to tell us (staff) that if we turned up to school in a mask we were to remove them before entering through the school gates.
They are a travesty of an authority.
My GP surgery did ours in a big church hall, all social distanced (well, except for the actual jab of course)I haven't gone to get my flu jab, mostly because I assumed it would be oversubscribed...
Why do you think this?
My GP surgery did ours in a big church hall, all social distanced (well, except for the actual jab of course)
Just speaking to someone at work. They booked Christmas in Dubai to see their family. Are not getting tested in case 'it is positive so we can't go'It's not even the economy, it's so Boris isn't the man who cancelled xmas
that WG did it to "be different" and it was "political" and the bit about knowing how WG works?Which bit?
My gym (which only does classes) has just mailed, saying they're closing from tomorrow night. Feel really sorry for them tbh as it's a very small, independent chain and imagine they must be really struggling.Yes, but group exercise classes (including fitness and dance) should not go ahead.
I was trying to remember what the phrase "new variant" reminded me of!Tory ministers talking about new variants takes me back to the days of child burger eating propaganda in response to new variant CJD.
New variant clown-pants torn disease.
that WG did it to "be different" and it was "political" and the bit about knowing how WG works?
So you don't think they just did it off their own backs to do "something"?Johnson was in the middle of his 'nothing to be seen here' phase. Castigating Starmer for being a lockdown scarer. Despite the very concept of a possible 'firebreak' being 'originally' a Johnson idea he'd nicked from Singapore. So as the Johnson government activated a policy of inertia, and with things getting obviously worse all round, the Welsh government took it upon themselves to nick 'his' idea and 'do something.' Despite knowing that this was the absolute minimum of what needed to be done and that the advice had been to do it weeks earlier. But it was an open window to do something, when the UK government was doing nothing. 1-0 to the Senedd.
But this limited action didn't take place in a vacuum. It took place in the midst of the Welsh government completely ballsing up a education covid policy that they were forced to retract just two weeks after publication. The whole Welsh back-to-school guidance that told us we were not allowed to wear face masks, and spent an awful long time in a 51 page directive to do so. The Welsh government that issued useless face shields but not masks. The Welsh government that spent 3 pages of that guidance telling teachers what marks to put in the register against fearful Covid-absentee pupils.
The same Welsh government that told its Directors of Education last Wednesday that schools must stay open at all costs and threatened to discipline a Headmistress who closed hers - 24 hours before a massive about turn where they closed the schools.
I work in a job more affected by Welsh government decisions on this than most. That's how I know. It's (partly) my job to read this stuff and act on it.
So you don't think they just did it off their own backs to do "something"?
Just because Wales has taken different decisions it seems to have been made out to be "doing it deliberately", "trying to show Boris/tories/englund up", and even "copying what englund do a few weeks later"
Seen all this kinda rubbish over and over on online comments along with "just do the same as the rest of the country"
e2a - apart from your area of work and expertise the rest is just your opinion/extrapolation?
This is a really crap attempt at a silver lining but I think the number of people who would have complied with the rules / any rules over Christmas is probably quite low. And many of those people (who would have complied) will be making sensible decisions anyway.The ridiculous easing of the rules over xmas is going to totally fuck us, isn't it?
If they actually gave a shit they would realise that every time they do this stuff and demonstrate that they have no consistent policy, no attention to the science until they're pushed into it, and are just winging it until a vaccine comes and saves their arses, compliance with anything goes down. But then if they gave a shit they wouldn't do all that in the first place. Or use it as an opportunity to funnel money to their cronies of course.What a shit show of a press conference now. The Gov messaging is really poor at the moment.
This is a really crap attempt at a silver lining but I think the number of people who would have complied with the rules / any rules over Christmas is probably quite low. So to some extent all that’s happening is the stupid government just trying to not make itself look even more useless, they had a choice between mass disobedience of totally unenforceable rules or Johnson benevolently gifting everyone Christmas.
What a shit show of a press conference now. The Gov messaging is really poor at the moment.
Oh ffsI literally have no idea what you are talking about and can't make sense of your post.
Hold my beer, says Whitty...View attachment 243527
I wish I felt as reassured by that statement as Whitty, no doubt, hoped it would be when he said it.