Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
Just been told we can’t wear masks at work anymore for reasons of access, so we have to wear visors instead. I don’t feel safe with just a visor. Are they allowed to do this?
What are 'reasons of access'?Just been told we can’t wear masks at work anymore for reasons of access, so we have to wear visors instead. I don’t feel safe with just a visor. Are they allowed to do this?
People who rely on seeing your lips move to understand what you are sayingWhat are 'reasons of access'?
What I don't get at the moment is what is driving these localised spikes. Are we just all agreeing that Geordies, Scousers and Brummies are worse at following the rules than everyone else in the UK? Seems unlikely that human behaviour will differ greatly between parts of the same country.
I suspect that around London and the south-east specifically, the extreme death count of the early pandemic has made people particularly cautious as a whole (even if many individuals are not). Plus there are a lot of people who have been able to work from home, which has thinned out the density of people on public transport and shops and services etc within the city, making those who have to travel for work safer. Then we have the oft-cited reasons around the nature of work in different places and the relative risks associated with different types of workplace
Just been told we can’t wear masks at work anymore for reasons of access, so we have to wear visors instead. I don’t feel safe with just a visor. Are they allowed to do this?
Which bit of H&S covers this?i would say no and quote H&S at them personally.
I think then you’d probably have to provide evidence that the mask provides a personal safety aspect that the visor lacks. Is that actually the case?i would say no and quote H&S at them personally.
A lot of it’s to do with money and access to wfh. The south east is fairly affluent, lots of outdoor spaces, lots of people able to work from home. It’s already gone through London so that’s less of a risk.
Now that people are “encouraged” to go back to work and restrictions lifted it’s hitting other urban areas and people who can’t just wfh.
How do you know it has nothing to do with any of those things?In my London borough compliance is really high and this has nothing to do with age, class, ethnic background or whatever.
Which bit of H&S covers this?
How do you know it has nothing to do with any of those things?
Surely there is a phone app (speech to text) that can show (as text) what you are saying?People who rely on seeing your lips move to understand what you are saying
face masks with a clear panel?Just been told we can’t wear masks at work anymore for reasons of access, so we have to wear visors instead. I don’t feel safe with just a visor. Are they allowed to do this?
This also ^face masks with a clear panel?
Masks with a clear panel for lipreading | Ideas For Ears
A handy list of the masks available to allow lipreading by having a clear panel so that people's mouths (or full face) can be seen.www.ideasforears.org.uk
mentioned by action for hearing loss as an option. Face coverings: how the regulations apply to you - Action on Hearing Loss
I'm in Preston (Number 4 in the ranking whooo) and WFH isn't really a thing here anymore if the morning traffic is anything to go by. We're all back in the office at work (although not through necessity - everyone wanted to come back)A lot of it’s to do with money and access to wfh. The south east is fairly affluent, lots of outdoor spaces, lots of people able to work from home. It’s already gone through London so that’s less of a risk.
Now that people are “encouraged” to go back to work and restrictions lifted it’s hitting other urban areas and people who can’t just wfh.
From Shops and branches - Working safely during coronavirus (COVID-19) - Guidance - GOV.UKEmployers should support their workers in using face coverings safely if they choose to wear one. It is not mandatory for shop or supermarket, indoor shopping centres, banks, building societies, post office workers, premises providing professional, legal or financial services and auction houses to wear face coverings although the government recommends that businesses consider their use where appropriate and where other mitigations are not in place. Employers should continue to follow ‘COVID-19 secure’ guidelines to reduce the proximity and duration of contact between employees.
Businesses already have legal obligations to protect their staff under existing employment law. This means taking appropriate steps to provide a safe working environment, which may include face coverings where appropriate, alongside other mitigations such as screens and social distancing.
Not allowed mobiles at work (though everyone ignores this)Surely there is a phone app (speech to text) that can show (as text) what you are saying?
I saw an article a while back from an ambulance medic who was using this format to communicate with people who had hearing issues. He just held his phone up and asked them questions, was very good.
Watch this space!If you wore a mask in defiance of orders, what would be the consequences do you think?
WFH definitely plays some part, in that a lot of service-sector jobs can be done from home whereas industrial ones usually can't. As you say, that might be why much of the south-east has done okay. However, using the two examples I stuck up above, both Bolton and Hull are pretty industrial and yet the situation in the two cities is very different.
I think another factor may well be connectivity. Hull's geographical isolation has probably worked in its favour, whereas Bolton is part of a larger conurbation. But again, that doesn't work in every case because London is by far the best connected city in the country and yet it's doing alright atm.
Population density probably has some influence, just because more people in close proximity = easier transmission. I'm sure, though, that if you dig around the figures you could find some dense cities (London springs to mind) doing fine and some pretty rural areas (Cumbria, perhaps) that aren't.
Poverty is another obvious influence, in that with that comes overcrowding, employers who don't give a shit, and so on. That seems partly to have driven the Leicester spike a few weeks ago. But again, Hull is the poorest large city in the UK, so not an explanation in itself.
In the end there's a big array of socioeconomic, geographical and other factors at play, and we're nowhere near understanding how they interact with one another.
It’sa fair point but in this instance we’re talking about infection rates themselves rather than fatalitiesA study I read recently claimed that differences in age structure accounted for around 90% of the differences in infection fatality rate between European nations. There are certainly very significant age structure differences in London at the council ward level and probably at borough level too. Such contrasts must exist elsewhere in the UK.
Your own safety is your responsibility ...
Possible solution; Wear mask under visor, and offer to take mask off for short interactions on request by user needing to lip read.
A study I read recently claimed that differences in age structure accounted for around 90% of the differences in infection fatality rate between European nations. There are certainly very significant age structure differences in London at the council ward level and probably at borough level too. Such contrasts must exist elsewhere in the UK.
Professor Chris Whitty, England's chief medical officer and Sir Patrick Vallance, the government's chief scientific adviser, warned the prime minister at a meeting on on Wednesday evening that the disease was now doubling every seven to eight days.
It is understood they warned the UK is now about six weeks behind France and Spain and in danger of seeing a substantial increase in the number of cases by mid-October if the virus is left unchecked.