littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
The answer may be a bit worse than that. The answer could be that they more or less followed the regulations, but that the regulations, in certain settings, for reasons perhaps not yet well understood, are inadequate. There has to be a reason why these workplaces are continually being implicated - it won't just be because food processing companies are uniquely shit employers.That company has fucked up somehow someway. Can't believe they are allowed to keep running with so many cases.
That's why that director of public health's response is both out of order and woefully inadequate. It is the exact opposite of what it should have been - this is clearly a workplace outbreak, we need to understand why it happened. That doesn't necessarily need to involve throwing out blame, and it may be counterproductive to do so. But it needs to be acknowledged otherwise it will just happen again. How often, if at all, are the workers there tested, for instance? Is it every week? If not, why not, given that we know how quickly a superspreader event can escalate in the right setting, and we know that food processing factories can be the right setting, even if we may not know exactly why that is the case?
One possible strategy in this kind of thing could be to test a set proportion of the workforce every day, then to test everyone if any of those tests comes back positive. Or there could be batch testing to save on costs, again with everyone tested if it comes back positive. Cos even weekly testing, if it's everyone at the same time, may not catch a big spread in time. It could be that testing like this to catch infection before it gets the chance to spread is the single most important measure you can take. Such approaches have worked thus far in the various sporting events taking place around Europe.
Last edited: