This is certainly a valid point.People have talked for years about staggering work times. It works really well for everybody else as long as I can have the 9-5 that works with my kids school/my partner’s hours/my hobbies/everything else
People have talked for years about staggering work times. It works really well for everybody else as long as I can have the 9-5 that works with my kids school/my partner’s hours/my hobbies/everything else
It hasn’t happened though, despite years of talking about it (hell, I remember such speculative articles when I was a teenager!), which is telling. I’ve worked in places with such “flexi-working” since 2010 but people still do 9-5 as their core. If anything, work hours have got longer, with many more just seeing 8-6 as standard.Could have some people starting at 10, others finishing at 4. The notion that eight hours' work is conducive to productivity bears zero scrutiny.
Both working from home and working in the office is great as long as it's a choice. Main issue with me is that I've come under pressure from my colleagues to go back in (no one who needs me and no one I actually report to) and that as someone whose moved a lot over the years and has another move imminent it's difficult to commit time and money to making a nice workspace for myself
My big concern about WFH as standard is that it offloads the cost of providing workspace and infrastructure onto workers, with no corresponding bump in salary or expenses.
That is true, although it’s not like I was getting a special bursary to cover the £400 a month I was spending in train fares.My big concern about WFH as standard is that it offloads the cost of providing workspace and infrastructure onto workers, with no corresponding bump in salary or expenses.
I'll do the 10am till 2pm shift
Thing is that there are people who might be saving x hundred pounds a month on travel, but that doesn't buy them a house or flat with adequate work space.
Take a couple of hours for lunch in there, wouldn’t do to get indigestion from scoffing your grub too quickly.
Bilal?Testing at our local mosque now. Weeks (months?) late, but better now than never I guess.
Bilal?
My big concern about WFH as standard is that it offloads the cost of providing workspace and infrastructure onto workers, with no corresponding bump in salary or expenses.
It was talked about on You & Yours on R4 today. Everyone where I work has had a lockdown pay cut incidentally, which is theoretically going away, but, you know. (To be fair, not based on the idea of working from home, more that the company was under more financial pressure, but it's been mentioned that it's not so bad because everyone's saving money not commuting.).
Unsurprisingly, someone at my work has already floated the idea that eventually, people who WFH could be paid less, as they no longer have to shell out for travel costs / higher cost of accommodation near work.
The response to my reply of "you fucking what now?!?!" was, "bottom line though, it'll be worth it to someone"
.
Unsurprisingly, someone at my work has already floated the idea that eventually, people who WFH could be paid less, as they no longer have to shell out for travel costs / higher cost of accommodation near work.
The response to my reply of "you fucking what now?!?!" was, "bottom line though, it'll be worth it to someone"
.
Unsurprisingly, someone at my work has already floated the idea that eventually, people who WFH could be paid less, as they no longer have to shell out for travel costs / higher cost of accommodation near work.
The response to my reply of "you fucking what now?!?!" was, "bottom line though, it'll be worth it to someone"
This is the thing. I've never heard of a company who pays people commuting extras (except if they're management, but that's a different matter).Presumably they pay people who live far away more than those who live close. Ah wait, no I bet they don't.