People have been doing that in London for weeks now. On hot days, it gets pretty busy. This is a bit like the panic about parks imo - people standing/sitting near (but not on top of) one another outside is making little or no difference in the grand scheme of things.they are meant to be takeaways, but most people are sitting on walls, pavements, like mini festivals, tbh.
Down here the people voted with their genitals and now the bogs are open.Where to have a piss has been one of lockdown's major practical conundrums!
Just been reading this on the BBC.
Coronavirus: Almost 100 staff at food factories test positive
The staff work at two different companies which supply food to hospitals, shops and restaurants.www.bbc.co.uk
And? What has that got to do with the price of cheese?I believe the Anglesey plant has - or at least, it has had - a significant number of Eastern European workers, but perhaps you have more recent local knowledge. I stand corrected.
Whatever it is, hopefully places are instituting regular testing regimes for staff. A covid bonus for everyone in a high risk environment would be nice. More chance of the pigs getting up and flying.What is it about meat processing plants and Covid-19?
What is it about meat processing plants and Covid-19?
Cold and moist.
And? What has that got to do with the price of cheese?
The number of daily coronavirus deaths in the UK has dropped to its lowest level since mid-March, according to the latest government figures.
SK's the odd one there. US is six feet, but SK's 1.4 seems very specific and isn't a foot thing. Do they have their own local units?Now this I didn't know
Coronavirus: PM to announce on Tuesday if pubs can reopen
Boris Johnson is also expected to announce a relaxation of the 2m distancing rule in England.www.bbc.co.uk
I'd fucking love it if that were the real answer.square root of 2 (ish)
although as I say the surface of a cone (which is what you'd think would be important for sneezing and the like) is proportional to the cube of the radius.
The area of the circle at the end of the cone increases proportional to the square of the height (distance between sneezer and sneezee). Think that's probably the relevant bit. So the amount of droplets in any given area at the end of the cone will decrease at a square of the distance? At 2 metres away, you'll get a quarter of the droplets you'd get at 1 metre away.although as I say the surface of a cone (which is what you'd think would be important for sneezing and the like) is proportional to the cube of the radius.
The area of the circle at the end of the cone increases proportional to the square of the height (distance between sneezer and sneezee). Think that's probably the relevant bit. So the amount of droplets in any given area at the end of the cone will decrease at a square of the distance? At 2 metres away, you'll get a quarter of the droplets you'd get at 1 metre away.
That's why rooms with high ceilings need proportionately bigger windows.
Still doesn't quite explain root 2 social distancing, sadly.
Yes, it would. We're going to double the amount of droplets you might get.oops yes it's the area of the base so indeed squared I was thinking as as I was writing it that I was perhaps being over confident.
would make sense if they started off at 2m to take it down to 1.4m though.
The WHO advice that halving the 2-metre rule will double the risk looks highly dubious to me. The virus count picked up within the cone of transmission - sort of thing - is hardly just going to double, surely it's going to be eight times (area is proportional to radius squared, volume proportional to radius cubed) as high.
Or not?