Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Coronavirus in the UK - news, lockdown and discussion

they are meant to be takeaways, but most people are sitting on walls, pavements, like mini festivals, tbh.
People have been doing that in London for weeks now. On hot days, it gets pretty busy. This is a bit like the panic about parks imo - people standing/sitting near (but not on top of) one another outside is making little or no difference in the grand scheme of things.
 
A couple of pubs in Maidenhead are doing takeaway booze. One is right on a busy road and there isn't anywhere to sit outside, or at least that bit isn't open yet, the other is at the top of the High Street and normally has tables outside but they have stern notices in the window saying you can't drink within sight of the premises.
 
I drove past a park near me last week and it was full of people drinking with friends and there were 3 bars around it doing takeaways.
Went down tonight with my bezzer and we were having a lovely evening, went to order more drinks and a takeaway pizza and they’d been told by police to stop serving drinks. Someone had complained about people pissing everywhere because they haven’t opened the toilets.
Honestly if the park toilets had been open, I don’t think there’d have been an issue.

We came back here to drink in the garden but it’s not the same. That tiny bit of normality was so nice. 😞
 
I believe the Anglesey plant has - or at least, it has had - a significant number of Eastern European workers, but perhaps you have more recent local knowledge. I stand corrected.
 
I believe the Anglesey plant has - or at least, it has had - a significant number of Eastern European workers, but perhaps you have more recent local knowledge. I stand corrected.
And? What has that got to do with the price of cheese?
 
What is it about meat processing plants and Covid-19?
Whatever it is, hopefully places are instituting regular testing regimes for staff. A covid bonus for everyone in a high risk environment would be nice. More chance of the pigs getting up and flying.

The smart way of responding now is to focus resources sharply in on this kind of emergent ongoing risk area.
 
Now this I didn't know

Graphic of social distancing rules around the world


 
although as I say the surface of a cone (which is what you'd think would be important for sneezing and the like) is proportional to the cube of the radius.

eta: as lbj remarks no it isn't - it's the square
 
Last edited:
the droplets from a sneeze will be spread out the further you are from the sneezer. If say you get 4 million droplets hit your nose and mouth 1 metre away then you'd only get 1 million droplets if you were 2 metres away .

eta edited because of my own maths failure :)
 
Last edited:
although as I say the surface of a cone (which is what you'd think would be important for sneezing and the like) is proportional to the cube of the radius.
The area of the circle at the end of the cone increases proportional to the square of the height (distance between sneezer and sneezee). Think that's probably the relevant bit. :hmm: So the amount of droplets in any given area at the end of the cone will decrease at a square of the distance? At 2 metres away, you'll get a quarter of the droplets you'd get at 1 metre away.

That's why rooms with high ceilings need proportionately bigger windows.

Still doesn't quite explain root 2 social distancing, sadly.
 
The area of the circle at the end of the cone increases proportional to the square of the height (distance between sneezer and sneezee). Think that's probably the relevant bit. :hmm: So the amount of droplets in any given area at the end of the cone will decrease at a square of the distance? At 2 metres away, you'll get a quarter of the droplets you'd get at 1 metre away.

That's why rooms with high ceilings need proportionately bigger windows.

Still doesn't quite explain root 2 social distancing, sadly.

oops yes it's the area of the base so indeed squared :oops: I was thinking as as I was writing it that I was perhaps being over confident.

would make sense if they started off at 2m to take it down to 1.4m though.
 
The WHO advice that halving the 2-metre rule will double the risk looks highly dubious to me. The virus count picked up within the cone of transmission - sort of thing - is hardly just going to double, surely it's going to be eight times (area is proportional to radius squared, volume proportional to radius cubed) as high.

Or not?

just to point out this earlier post was bollocks too - should have been squared rather than cubed.
 
Back
Top Bottom