The gerontricide party doesn't even care if they die comfortably.How to mismanage a crisis.
Special Report: In shielding its hospitals from COVID-19, Britain left many of the weakest exposed
On a doorstep in the suburbs of north London, three-year-old Ayse picked up a tissue to wipe away her grandmother's tears - tears for one more victim of the virus.www.reuters.com
How to mismanage a crisis.
Special Report: In shielding its hospitals from COVID-19, Britain left many of the weakest exposed
On a doorstep in the suburbs of north London, three-year-old Ayse picked up a tissue to wipe away her grandmother's tears - tears for one more victim of the virus.www.reuters.com
London’s ambulance service also issued new guidance.
Ambulance crews assess patients using a standard scoring system of vital signs. According to the Royal College of Physicians, a professional body for doctors, a patient who scores five or more on a 20-point scale should be provided with clinical care and monitored each hour. A patient scoring five would normally be taken to hospital.
But in early March, London’s ambulance service raised the bar for COVID-19 patients to seven.
“I have never seen a score of seven being used before,” said one NHS paramedic interviewed by Reuters. The medic spoke on condition of anonymity.
On April 10, the required score was lowered to five. In a statement, the London Ambulance Service told Reuters its previous guidance was one of several assessments used and clinical judgment was the deciding factor. Asked if the guidance reflected the national approach, the NHS did not respond.
Possible evidence of restrictions on admissions came in a study of 17,000 patients admitted for COVID-19 to 166 NHS hospitals between February 6 and April 1. The study showed that one-third of these patients died, a high fatality rate.
Calum Semple, the lead author and professor of outbreak medicine at Liverpool University, said, in an interview with Reuters, this indicated, among other things, that England set a “high bar” for hospital admission. “Essentially, only those who are pretty sick get in.” But, he said, there was no data yet on whether that high bar ultimately made people in Britain with COVID-19 worse off. The NHS didn’t comment.
The results of hundreds of thousands of coronavirus tests carried out at privately run drive-through centres in England have not yet been shared with GPs or local authorities, who complain they have “no idea” where local disease clusters are.
GPs told the Guardian they had been “totally left out of the conversation” after the government said it was still “working on a technical solution” to get Covid-19 test results into individual GP records in England, having promised to do so weeks ago.
When the government began its pillar two testing scheme in late March it promised GPs that results would be linked to the medical records of patients in England.
But Nick Mann, a GP at the Well Street surgery in Hackney, London, is one of many doctors to complain this has not happened. “As a GP I’m absolutely fuming, not only with the way it’s been mishandled but with the unreliable information we are getting,” he said. “This government has developed a completely parallel system in order to bypass the NHS, and it’s failing.”
Dominic Harrison, director of public health at Blackburn with Darwen council in Lancashire, said: “The Deloitte screening programme has now been running for a number of weeks and we have seen no data from that. So I have no idea whether 10, 100 or 1,000 Blackburn with Darwen residents have tested positive.
“I certainly hope they sort that out very very quickly because it is critical information for us in developing the strategy for case finding and contract tracing once the lockdown is lifted..”
No pressures on the government for any of their most obvious failings are relieved at all by what has happened to Ferguson.
neither am I having read that.Otherwise when I'm out in public I get sent random dick pics. No way am I ever going to open up my bluetooth to unknown devices.
They're all always total shit. Basically Matt from the Telegraph with a joint and a spraycan.aye, it's totally shit
It does not help that the BBC and the rest of the press is failing to cover the pandemic as an emergency. The BBC is basically back to the wartime rules coverage. You go on the BBC's website and what you see is stories like 'I am 23, I hadn't realised Covid-19 can affect me too' or 'Corona virus: I get dressed up every day but have nowhere to go', etc. The general approach seems to be let's not dwell on the daily death rate and government's blunders, instead let's do a bit of public-health messaging and tell the public what is being done about testing. What you get after weeks of this sort of coverage is masses of people desensitized to the horror of covid-19, similar to when soldiers are dying in some distant conflict and you can't quite associate yourself with their deaths because no one talks about their deaths nor the reasons and causes of their deaths.Something that's bothering me a lot about COVID-19. In many other events involving needless death of large numbers of people like a terrorist attack or a natural disaster or something you'd have minutes silences ordered by the govt, flags at half mast, memorials announced etc. There doesn't seem to be anything like that with this unless I've missed it. There aren't many details about most of the people who died and I guess it's because there are just so many but it seems really sad and wrong
So the plane from Turkey finally arrives. What a fucking circus.
I presume this was a political stunt a bit like those repatriation flights for asylum seekers where they’d spend a fortune chartering a jet, invite the media along to get it on the front page so it would look like they were doing something. Meanwhile British-made stuff is being exported for lack of orders. Clowns.
How to mismanage a crisis.
Special Report: In shielding its hospitals from COVID-19, Britain left many of the weakest exposed
On a doorstep in the suburbs of north London, three-year-old Ayse picked up a tissue to wipe away her grandmother's tears - tears for one more victim of the virus.www.reuters.com
Rambles are already unlimited
exercise should be limited to a reasonable period only once a day
I wouldn’t be surprised if garden centres and golf are re opened though.
A limit that comprises the idea of “just be reasonable, lads” isn’t really a limit.Not in Wales (I can't speak for England, funny country that place over there).
COVID-19 alert levels | Sub-topic | GOV.WALES
The restrictions during our gradual move out of lockdown.gov.wales
I thought you were supposed to ramble once a day and close to home , and maybe those are both changing? Looks like national trust likely to reopen its sites (which will be very inconvenient as I’ve gotten used to having the whole place to myself)Rambles are already unlimited as you don’t go more than once. Although various people have tossed around the idea of limiting outdoor activity to an hour, it’s never actually been policy.
Something that's bothering me a lot about COVID-19. In many other events involving needless death of large numbers of people like a terrorist attack or a natural disaster or something you'd have minutes silences ordered by the govt, flags at half mast, memorials announced etc. There doesn't seem to be anything like that with this unless I've missed it. There aren't many details about most of the people who died and I guess it's because there are just so many but it seems really sad and wrong
Not in Wales (I can't speak for England, funny country that place over there).
COVID-19 alert levels | Sub-topic | GOV.WALES
The restrictions during our gradual move out of lockdown.gov.wales
I was sure I recollect an hour for exercise .. is that wrong?As with England there's no definition of what a 'reasonable period' is.
I was sure I recollect an hour for exercise .. is that wrong?
As with England there's no definition of what a 'reasonable period' is.
You may leave your home to exercise once a day and combine this with walking your dog. When doing this you should minimise the time you are out
17. Is there any time restriction on being outdoors for the purpose of exercise?
There is no limit on how long you can exercise for, but you should spend as short a time away from your home as possible. Stay local if you can and act responsibly at all times. Once you have undertaken exercise, you should go home immediately. Do not linger in public places. For example, after having gone for a run or a cycle, you should not sit down or rest away from your home, unless necessary for health reasons.
Ive seen loads of pieces on the BBC / ITV about the people who have died (and tbh I hate it; wheeling out newly bereaved people to make them cry on the telly and ask stupid questions like ‘how do you feel?’) , and there was that silence for the NHS workers who died the other week.
England doesn't use the word 'reasonable'. It says this, which, if anything, is actually more definitive.
National lockdown: Stay at Home
Coronavirus cases are rising rapidly across the country. Find out what you can and cannot do.www.gov.uk
Which doesn't logically extend to 'unlimited' does it?