Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Coronavirus in the UK - news, lockdown and discussion

The twats keeping coming

88309350-84c5-11ea-bf3f-09ada0827386



 
Unlike some days, I quite liked the questions asked in the press conference today. Sadly most of the answers were slippery and uninteresting, but since we have gotten at least some proper clues about their test, track, trace plans going forwards (ie we know they are actually going to bother with that stuff) I suppose I can live with that for today.

Peston asked Vallance about the 20,000 deaths figure he used to wheel out. No replacement number was forthcoming.
 
yeah, they haven't actually recruited the 18,000 contact tracers yet treelover - consider it the next 100,000 tests a day until they actually wheel them out.
Ah yes. Any mention of how that's going? Last I saw, they were up to about 20,000 and there's only a week to go...
 
Ah yes. Any mention of how that's going? Last I saw, they were up to about 20,000 and there's only a week to go...
well, they keep saying they have capacity for 40,000 a day, but not enough people are going to get tested so they're only doing 20,000 - presumably the testing criteria is currently too tight. So they announced testing for teachers and families, which will definitely boost the numbers I'd imagine.
 
well, they keep saying they have capacity for 40,000 a day, but not enough people are going to get tested so they're only doing 20,000 - presumably the testing criteria is currently too tight. So they announced testing for teachers and families, which will definitely boost the numbers I'd imagine.
So even at capacity, 60, 000 short.
 
well, they keep saying they have capacity for 40,000 a day, but not enough people are going to get tested so they're only doing 20,000 - presumably the testing criteria is currently too tight. So they announced testing for teachers and families, which will definitely boost the numbers I'd imagine.
As mentioned early only if those people can actually access the testing.

They're going to have to consider self testing at home because I suspect the throughput of a drive through centre is too low to increase numbers significantly. Then PHE have the issue of how to get swabs from suspected covid patients from people's homes to the testing facilities whilst complying with their biological specimen transportations regulations.
 
tbh that sounds like something beyond being a twat, and more towards some very strange and disturbing thoughts rattling around in his head. He may need help more than anything.
Hard to know, of course, but I wouldn't 'medicalise' it without knowing more. Weird misogynists do vile things like this routinely i.e. assault women. :mad:
 
Testing facilities might have the capacity and the ability to expand on that but that's no use if we can't actually take that amount of swabs per day (and then get them to the testing facility to go onto the test run/batch).

I think most of the testing facilities are run in batches because the test and machinery doesn't allow 'random access' (sample turns up, stuck it on the analyser....if the analyser is running you have to wait for the run to finish to get the next run on) therefore there are limited windows if opportunity to get the sample on the test run and unless you've got couriers going back and forth constantly transport if samples to testing facility will be batches too.
 
As mentioned early only if those people can actually access the testing.

They're going to have to consider self testing at home because I suspect the throughput of a drive through centre is too low to increase numbers significantly. Then PHE have the issue of how to get swabs from suspected covid patients from people's homes to the testing facilities whilst complying with their biological specimen transportations regulations.
oh sure, capacity by itself is pretty meaningless.
 
Who says there's been a change in usage? Natural immunity is one form of herd immunity. Checking in a current medical dictionary, there's no mention of herd immunity only referring to vaccine-related immunity.

Far from claiming it "only" referred to vaccination programmes, I was the one who raised and noted its older use! The epidemiologists and public health officials expressing outrage at the time were similarly taken aback.

So yes, "herd immunity" can be used to refer to the effects of "natural immunity" on the patterns of epidemics. I've been saying for weeks that they must mean natural immunity. That usage is different in kind from its usage as regards vaccinations, and employing an already obscure technical term in an even more obscure fashion remains atrocious public information.
 
Far from claiming it "only" referred to vaccination programmes, I was the one who raised and noted its older use! The epidemiologists and public health officials expressing outrage at the time were similarly taken aback.

So yes, "herd immunity" can be used to refer to the effects of "natural immunity" on the patterns of epidemics. I've been saying for weeks that they must mean natural immunity. That usage is different in kind from its usage as regards vaccinations, and employing an already obscure technical term in an even more obscure fashion remains atrocious public information.
I don't think herd immunity is a particularly obscure concept - it's been a key part of the very widespread and high profile pro/anti-vax debates of the past decade or so.
 
I don't think herd immunity is a particularly obscure concept - it's been a key part of the very widespread and high profile pro/anti-vax debates of the past decade or so.
Absolutely, as I said, anyone who's argued with anti-vaxers will be familiar with it. Not everyone has. From their comments at the time, it was clear that several journalists had never heard of it; and those laissez faire fundies who continue to tout it still haven't grasped its basics.
 
Back
Top Bottom