wayward bob
i ate all your bees
those numbers are somewhat reassuring. i keep expecting it to skyrocket at some point, glad we're not there yet.
At that rate it's 10,000 by the end of March.
I wasn't really predicting, as there's no real way to do so, only really an exercise in what various rates might look like laterSomewhat better than your previous prediction of 78,000, and about where Italy is now.
Haven't they said that as of today they are testing everyone attending / in hospital with a respiratory problem? How long does it take for the test results to come in? Because it seems to me this will be the crunch moment - either an enormous surge or a sigh of relief.
Deputy CMO just announced the UK epidemic peak is likely to start in about 2 weeks.
Sensible discussion and debate with differing POV is what the forum is about isn't it? Time, as always will tell, with the outcome and my take is that we will have a new strain of influenza in the human population ie it will become endemic.
It is right, both on the subject of carers and more generally about the general unsustainability of so much of how modern society is set up (even in normal times leading to people's lives being fucked when just some small thing becomes impossible), the pointlessness of GDP as the primary measure of social health, and so on.re school closures i think zoe williams has it spot on
School closures will lay bare the private struggles so many of us endure | Zoe Williams
The likely coronavirus response will disrupt family life and show just how many people, young and old, need care, says Guardian columnist Zoe Williamswww.theguardian.com
It is scary to think that I am 42 and have never faced the slightest real national crisis, I mean, nothing that has in any meaningful way disrupted day-to-day life en-masse. Let alone potentially (let's face it, probably) affecting everyone. For weeks.
I don't think we're well set up to deal with this in any way, logistical or psychological.
I'm quite taken with an idea I read on Twitter where someone was saying we cannot hope for anything like real productivity working from home, far better, where possible, for people to do just what it takes to keep things moving for just a few hours a day, a few days a week, and concentrate on looking after our mental and physical needs and our families. Obviously, that's not going to be an option for every worker, but when discussing with my manager (seeing as our job is not critical to anything) I want to suggest we take this approach and not expect 7 hours a day 5 days a week from anyone if it comes to lockdown, which I think she'll be open to.
She sounds a right charmer. Cough all over her at every opportunity.but is in a panic herself that someone might get one over her by not being as productive as usual.
She sounds a right charmer. Cough all over her at every opportunity.
She sounds quite unreasonable though, although she might be getting pressure from above. I'm the complete opposite - I tell the team if they need to work from home (not just at the moment) for whatever reason to just do it. We normally do 2/3 days a week at home as a rule anyway, but often 5 where need be.I mean that's not what she said of course. Something about people not having their usual routine blah blah. I'm more annoyed because having people WFH as much as possible over the next couple of months is just the socially responsible thing to do. If I have to come to work I want to share the tube with as few people as possible.
She sounds quite unreasonable though, although she might be getting pressure from above.
The local story here is that the owner of Nottingham Forest has a confirmed case of covid-19, and met with the entire team late last week.
So there goes promotion for yet another season.
Seeing how few are infected in my county perhaps my thought in the post above is premature.