“Be careful whilst not actually doing anything careful. Just think careful and talk about how careful you are.”so we're to go clubbing in hot, sweaty crowded rooms but wear masks while we do? or what? does anyone understand what the government's messaging is now?
I think the message is just Keep supporting your friendly blameless government - if you want to be careful then here is some sober face and some words about Vigilance for you, if you want to burn your mask & party go right ahead, enjoy the gift of Freedom Day, either way, not our fault keep voting conservative thanks.
Especially if the survey was done anywhere near Westminster...Also worth remembering that a huge number of people are thick as shit.
On a related note most of the media didnt want to touch Labours use of JohnsonVariant with a bargepole.
This prompted my to check again about ACE inhibiters,This looks like an interesting bit of research - having the flu jab reduces the risks of certain outcomes in COVID.
Flu jab may reduce severe effects of Covid, suggests study
Analysis of 75,000 coronavirus patients found fewer major health problems among people with flu jabwww.theguardian.com
https://heart.bmj.com/content/106/19/1503 said:Conclusion
In this very large population-based study, ACE inhibitor and ARB prescriptions were associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19 RT-PCR positive disease in a hospital setting adjusting for a wide range of demographic factors, potential comorbidities and other medication. There was no evidence of an increased or decreased risk associated with either drug for ICU admission. There are marked variations in risk of COVID-19 disease and ICU admission by ethnic group, with highest rates among BAME groups. The strength of this association is greater with the more severe outcome and is not explained by age, sex, deprivation, geographical region or several comorbidities and intercurrent medications included in the analysis. The counterintuitive finding of smokers having a lower risk of COVID-19 disease requiring hospital admission and ICU admission deserves further study.
Edit now I've caught up with the thread:People who are vaccinated against influenza may be partly protected against some of the severe effects of coronavirus, and be less likely to need emergency care, according to a major study.
The analysis of nearly 75,000 Covid patients found significant reductions in stroke, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and sepsis, and fewer admissions to emergency departments and intensive care units, among those who had been given the flu jab.
grrr
I'm sick of hearing the phrase if not now, when? It's clearly on the 'line to take' bit of their briefings before ministers go in front of the media. Junior health minister Edward Agar was using it again on the media rounds this morning.
If not now, when?
How about once the Delta wave has subsided, hospitals aren't filling up with Covid patients and everyone I meet doesn't have a story about someone they know who has Covid even though they've been double jabbed.
Because... errr... because... errr...I’ve stopped listening to the lying shits on their morning round of lying to the public via the medium of the complicit media outlets, but can anyone tell me - is there any explanation at any point (or even are they asked for one) as to why the ‘if not now then when?’ removal of public health protections in favour of the economy includes mask wearing, which has effectively zero effect on economic output and productivity?
Indeed - why has this become such an icon of "freedom" - when so many of us are looking at all unnecessary exposure to pathogens in the light of the current experience.is there any explanation at any point (or even are they asked for one) as to why the ‘if not now then when?’ removal of public health protections in favour of the economy includes mask wearing, which has effectively zero effect on economic output and productivity?
very interesting this. Not much info in here but intriguing. If they can identify long covid via a test for these special kind of antibodies does that a treatment more likely to follow?
Long Covid: rogue antibody discovery raises hope of blood test
Test could be available from GPs within six months, as scientists warn of ‘a lot of damage to a lot of lives’www.theguardian.com
very interesting this. Not much info in here but intriguing. If they can identify long covid via a test for these special kind of antibodies does that a treatment more likely to follow?
Long Covid: rogue antibody discovery raises hope of blood test
Test could be available from GPs within six months, as scientists warn of ‘a lot of damage to a lot of lives’www.theguardian.com
Did you mention any of your concerns to the management?I'm in favour of keeping masks as a thing for a while but I wonder if it will become the next 'hand sanitiser', ie. something you get people to do to make it look like you're actually taking measures to reduce risk, while you just ignore a whole bunch of other stuff that would probably make a bigger difference.
For the first time in ages this weekend I went for a meal 'out' but sitting indoors. Something I am still planning to avoid as much as possible for a while. The place had hand sanitizer at the door, it had the NHS check in QR, the staff all had masks on. But then we were shown to a table in quite a large room, there was only one other table occupied but they put us at a table virtually next to them instead of one of the free ones at the other end of the room. It was a warm summer evening but exactly zero windows were open, and nor were the the full height patio doors. You had to put a mask on to go to the toilet though so it was all perfectly risk free.
Masks would make more of a difference to the spread of an airborne disease than hand sanitiser, but a lot of people do use them as a kind of talisman (masks & / hand sanitiser).I'm in favour of keeping masks as a thing for a while but I wonder if it will become the next 'hand sanitiser', ie. something you get people to do to make it look like you're actually taking measures to reduce risk, while you just ignore a whole bunch of other stuff that would probably make a bigger difference.
For the first time in ages this weekend I went for a meal 'out' but sitting indoors. Something I am still planning to avoid as much as possible for a while. The place had hand sanitizer at the door, it had the NHS check in QR, the staff all had masks on. But then we were shown to a table in quite a large room, there was only one other table occupied but they put us at a table virtually next to them instead of one of the free ones at the other end of the room. It was a warm summer evening but exactly zero windows were open, and nor were the the full height patio doors. You had to put a mask on to go to the toilet though so it was all perfectly risk free.
Masks would make more of a difference to the spread of an airborne disease than hand sanitiser, but a lot of people do use them as a kind of talisman (masks & / hand sanitiser).
No, so I suppose if anyone catches Covid there in the next few weeks and then dies, it'll all be my fault.Did you mention any of your concerns to the management?
A key thing that interests me is the differences between offering just the spike protein to teach the body's immune system and expecting it to learn to recognise the whole virus ...
I figure maybe it's going to be more "efficient" for teaching the immune system...
Presumably if the antibodies learn to attack a large variety of viral proteins, there's more chance of it attacking the wrong thing.
I still don't know if the "long flu" I had in 2019 was "ME" or just because I'd sailed into diabetic waters through inactivity ...
Only logic I can see is that masks retard the spread of the disease. It interferes with the mass infection policy.I’ve stopped listening to the lying shits on their morning round of lying to the public via the medium of the complicit media outlets, but can anyone tell me - is there any explanation at any point (or even are they asked for one) as to why the ‘if not now then when?’ removal of public health protections in favour of the economy includes mask wearing, which has effectively zero effect on economic output and productivity?