Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Coronavirus in the UK - news, lockdown and discussion

See today, he didn't tell us how many deaths had been recorded in the most recent 24 hour period. He said that the average for the last seven days was 926.
Is this the new thing, not giving us the daily figure?
 
View attachment 248371

:hmm:

View attachment 248372


Pretty sure there aren't 1.43 million people in Iceland...

E2a: ah, that's 1.43 vaccinated per 100 people. So it might actually be true that the UK has vaccinated more people overall than the rest of Europe. Although if the question is, 'how many have had the correct dose of a vaccine in the UK' then the answer seems to be 'just Boris Johnson's dad' :(
 
Last edited:
See today, he didn't tell us how many deaths had been recorded in the most recent 24 hour period. He said that the average for the last seven days was 926.
Is this the new thing, not giving us the daily figure?

It depends when the daily figure came out. Today it had not come out by the time the press conference began.
 
Coronavirus: Morrisons to ban shoppers who refuse to wear face masks



Wonder if other supermarkets will follow this example...

They certainly should. Most people atm are being pretty good about masks round here, but pretty much every time I go in the small Sainsbury's near me - thankfully the only fully enclosed shop I need to regularly - there's at least one person in there either maskless or with it below their nose, and they're never challenged. I did remark to the bloke packing my bag that the woman who'd just gone out - who'd come and stood right next to me and then looked at me as if I was weird when I took a step away - ought to have had a mask on, and he said, 'I agree, but we're not allowed to stop them.' FFS.
 
They certainly should. Most people atm are being pretty good about masks round here, but pretty much every time I go in the small Sainsbury's near me - thankfully the only fully enclosed shop I need to regularly - there's at least one person in there either maskless or with it below their nose, and they're never challenged. I did remark to the bloke packing my bag that the woman who'd just gone out - who'd come and stood right next to me and then looked at me as if I was weird when I took a step away - ought to have had a mask on, and he said, 'I agree, but we're not allowed to stop them.' FFS.
In Boots yesterday, there was a security guard who challenged a maskless guy. Who said he had a mask in his bag so the security guard let him in. AFAIK, they don't actually work if they're in your bag. :facepalm:
 
Pensioners 'walk the plank' to reach city's new vaccine centre Pensioners 'walk the plank' to reach city's new vaccine centre

Literally Walk the Plank.
I know it's not the main entrance but it's not a good look is it, and they've had enough time to prepare at Millennium Point.
It seems to continue the theme of "use a telephoto lens to make it look worse than it is" which has been so popular during this pandemic.

 
When Hancock said 'dont blow it now' my response was 'You already blew it in September and then compounded the error by blowing it again in October, November and December!' Obviously there were errors before and after those months too, but looking at the most striking features of political failure to deal with the second wave, I think September-December involved decisions that were even worse than most people realised at the time. The modelling and talk of what September measures were baked into the reasonable worst case winter scenario that government departments & institutions used when planning for this period means that all the failure to do circuit breakers, other national measures at various points was even worse than it looked to us at the time. I already knew that they blew their 'following the science' excuse/cover in August and September and left themselves exposed, but the papers I was on about earlier make this lack of cover even more complete. Its no wonder they have subsequently made so much use of the new variant to excuse their failings. I'm sure I'll come back to this point plenty, especially once I can see how the peak in this new variant era ends up comparing to some of the scenarios they modelled months ago, before the new variant was on the radar.

The way the media are covering things now is also months late. There is still always something to play for in future in terms of getting infection levels down, but it does drive me mad that we get the serious focus and sombre stuff only during the period we are told we are into the worst weeks of the pandemic so far. Couldnt we have gone quite a bit earlier with that stuff, when there was more scope to make the peak less high?
 
But they aren't the most up to date figures available! It's exactly the same data used to produce the date-of-death figures, but with the numbers shifted around to dates that are a less accurate measure of what's actually happening.

The fact is that we don't know how many people have died in the past few days. Producing these rolling average numbers doesn't magically create more information.

The fact that it's what's widely used in the press isn't an argument for it being the best measure. The press like using the 'deaths reported today' number because it's often large and good for headlines and appears to be up-to-date information.

In this past week in particular we know that the deaths reported are going to be heavily influenced by the catch-up on Christmas and New year reporting.

I didnt have the headspace to reply to some aspects of this the other day, but there was a point I should have made at the time.

Unfortunately as far as I remember when I looked into this at one stage during the first wave, using rolling averages of the 'daily deaths by reporting date' was a pretty reasonable indicator of where the 'daily deaths by date of death' figure for the period would eventually end up. Not exact, but in the same realm.
 
I didnt have the headspace to reply to some aspects of this the other day, but there was a point I should have made at the time.

Unfortunately as far as I remember when I looked into this at one stage during the first wave, using rolling averages of the 'daily deaths by reporting date' was a pretty reasonable indicator of where the 'daily deaths by date of death' figure for the period would eventually end up. Not exact, but in the same realm.

Exactly, the curves were very similiar in the first wave, and I see no reason why that'll not be the case this time, especially when you look at the patterns of new cases & hospital admissions, which gives an early indication of deaths to come. :(
 
I didnt have the headspace to reply to some aspects of this the other day, but there was a point I should have made at the time.

Unfortunately as far as I remember when I looked into this at one stage during the first wave, using rolling averages of the 'daily deaths by reporting date' was a pretty reasonable indicator of where the 'daily deaths by date of death' figure for the period would eventually end up. Not exact, but in the same realm.
Isn't that largely because of the shape of the curve in the first wave, which saw a fairly even and steady increase. The curve for the 2nd wave has been much less tidy to far.
 
Back
Top Bottom