DrRingDing
'anti-human wanker'
Jessiedog said:Again, it's just you and the maoists claiming this "policy", then.
Who else could say what their policy is!?
Jessiedog said:Again, it's just you and the maoists claiming this "policy", then.
There are ample reports from numerous, respected human rights organisations, that detail the forced recruitment of children into the maoist ranks, Dr.DrRingDing said:Who else could say what their policy is!?
DrRingDing said:What would the posters here do if they had the stark choice between oppression, misery and hard labour OR joining others in an armed struggle for improvements in your own and others lives?
Well, I guess if I were a young teenager with a maoist gun stuck in my face, I'd "do the right thing".DrRingDing said:What would the posters here do if they had the stark choice between oppression, misery and hard labour OR joining others in a struggle for improvements in your own and others lives?
Jessiedog said:Well, I guess if I were a young teenager with a maoist gun stuck in my face, I'd "do the right thing".
Who wouldn't?
Woof
Jessiedog said:Well, I guess if I were a young teenager with a maoist gun stuck in my face, I'd "do the right thing".
I have.DrRingDing said:Answer the question.
Ahem.....Without your fantasy scenario.
Jessiedog said:As has been pointed out on this thread, many times, (for anyone who has the intestinal fortitude to wade through the multiple plethoras of rabbit-holing, sidetracking and other distractions, that is,) the sources provided that assert such maoist attrocities are impeccable.
Your sources on the other hand have been shown to be as thin as the paucity of any credible argument that purports to support them.
There are ample reports from numerous, respected human rights organisations, that detail the forced recruitment of children into the maoist ranks, Dr.
As you well know!
It's just you and the maoists claiming otherwise.
As usual!
Huh?You know the maoists are not the only guerillas in Nepal....and what does that tell us Mr Dog?
Ummm.DrRingDing said:We dont live in hippy love fest of a world Mr Dog where there are perfect solutions.
Nah.DrRingDing said:I'm an anarchist
DrRingDing said:You know the maoists are not the only guerillas in Nepal....and what does that tell us Mr Dog?
sanjeev said:
I was born in Nepal.
DrRingDing said:nemaste
sanjeev said:And what makes you think you know other guerillas in Nepal?
Need some valid arguments please!
Jessiedog said:
As has been pointed out on this thread, many times, (for anyone who has the intestinal fortitude to wade through the multiple plethoras of rabbit-holing, sidetracking and other distractions, that is,) the sources provided that assert such maoist attrocities are impeccable.
Your sources on the other hand have been shown to be as thin as the paucity of any credible argument that purports to support them.
Repeatedly.
There are ample reports from numerous, respected human rights organisations, that detail the forced recruitment of children into the maoist ranks, Dr.
As you well know!
It's just you and the maoists claiming otherwise.
As usual!
Woof
DrRingDing said:um from activists inside Nepal.
sanjeev said:how many people do you know in Nepal.
Jessiedog said:Aye!
Woof
Merry Christmas.DrRingDing said:That's horrific Netetiquette....begone with you beastiliy crudities...now pootle along there's anice chap.
Which they'll NEVER do. Monarchical/royal dictators NEVER cede their full position voluntarily - they just wriggle off the hook by getting an arselicky load of grovellers to allow them to stay on as "constituntional" monarchs.Andy the Don said:The transition government, rightly state that it is not up to them to make Nepal a republic, but a fully elected constitutional government.
poster342002 said:Which they'll NEVER do. Monarchical/royal dictators NEVER cede their full position voluntarily - they just wriggle off the hook by getting an arselicky load of grovellers to allow them to stay on as "constituntional" monarchs.
In no other form of dictatorship would this be considered an acceptable compromise. Would Saddam Huusuein, for expample, have been allowed to stay on as "constitutional" fugurehead? Or Ceasuescu? How about Milosovic or Suharto? Of course not - and rigthly so. But neither should any dictator who takes the precaution of being a "royal" one get away this trick, either.
It just wouldn't work like that. Once they're co-opted under the age-old tactic of monarchical patronage, theyre totally beholden to it. Look at the UK, for example.Andy the Don said:Depends, if the Nepalese parties (or a bloc of parties) state that they will make the country a republic should they get elected & they get elected. Then the monarchy would have to give way unless they want the civil war to reignite.
Andy the Don said:It seems that the Maoists have decided that due to their poor showing in the polls they are going dispense with elected democracy & withdraw from the interim government. Using the transition governments refusal to make Nepal a republic as a reason.l The transition government, rightly state that it is not up to them to make Nepal a republic, but a fully elected constitutional government.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7000252.stm
DrRingDing said:Do you swallow everyting from the BBC with such glee?