Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Collapse of the World Trade Centre (cont.)

Jazzz

the truth don't care
Banned
Donna F. said:
Can I look at this a different way?

Suppose you were engaged in a state conspiracy to create an atrocity that would justify (etc etc etc). Would you really send teams of operatives into a previously-bombed building with explosives? Given how many people would need to be involved, or the amount of time it would take, or both - wouldn't the risk of detection be just too great?

(By way of contrast, the Watergate burglary, a basic in-and-out affair, used what - four to six people? - and they still got caught.)
DF,

You need to control the security of the World Trade Centre complex. That is all.

No here's a funny thing - the company that was in charge of security for the World Trade Centre was also in charge of security for Dulles airport (from which flight 77 took off) and also United Airlines! A curious coincidence.

An even more curious coincidence is that Marvin Bush, George Bush's brother, was on its board of directors.

Bush-Linked Company Handled Security for the WTC, Dulles and United
 
hate to add petrol to flames or whatever the saying is, but what about the earlier ( half arsed ) bombing of the WTC by the Aayrabs ?
 
Oh for for the love of god...

Just watch the video FFS.

It is very obvious, in both cases, where the collapse begins.

You have to be utterly stupid to believe that they collapsed from the bottom.
 
Back
Top Bottom