Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

CNN caught out.

Status
Not open for further replies.
In Bloom said:
This is that nonsense you always spout about bankers controlling the world or sommat, isn't it?

You can find the same sort of shit if you look online at old copies of Der Sturmer unfortunately.

Azrael23's conspiraloonery is just old style 'the jews control the world ' stuff with a different gloss on it.
 
wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

round and round the threads do go... where theyll stop ... no one knows


anyone got any new kitten pictures? or has the time come for kittens to be usurped by puppies?

golden_retriever_puppy_pictures.jpg
 
Pingu said:
has the time come for kittens to be usurped by puppies?

golden_retriever_puppy_pictures.jpg

Careful, I think you might be drummed out of the Brownies for even daring to make such a suggestion.

But I secretly agree with you

;)
 
We need a special image on here when dealing with the conspiraloons.

May I suggest

This....

nuts1.jpg


A bowl of nuts is highly appropriate IMO. :D
 
Azrael23 said:
Hmmm I wonder why they need to try and influence people to oppose what Sheen said.
Err, that's how TV debates work. A room full of people agreeing with each other doesn't exactly make for compelling TV.

But no need to take my word for it -try watching the news or any current affairs program and see what people are saying!

Why you swallow up and regurgitate this pitiful non-story from the laughable prisonplanet is anyone's guess.

Why not try thinking for yourself?
 
pk said:
Doesn't a moderator have a special "delete" button for this?

Or - even better - a "ban" button...?

Or are we destined to put up with this shit here forever?
If he keeps wasting bandwidth by endlessly regurgitating laughable conspiraloon non-stories from prison planet (and posting them in the wrong forum), a ban will indeed become a likely option.
 
Just curious.

How many of Azrael23's threads in the past 30 days alone have since been proven to be utter deluded bollocks?

99 percent?

98 percent?

:D

----------------------------------------------

CNN caught out. (Multi-page thread 1 2)
Azrael23

Blair Question. (PembrokeStephen) (Multi-page thread 1 2 3 4)
Azrael23

Portland 2002 "Riot".... The police footage.
Azrael23

Franklin Scandal
Azrael23

Iraq is killing us... (Multi-page thread 1 2 3 4)
Azrael23

New Forum for the Revolution
Azrael23

Andreas Van Bulow (Multi-page thread 1 2)
Azrael23

Poll: Free Discussion of 9/11 (Multi-page thread 1 2)
Azrael23

Poll: The Queen (Multi-page thread 1 2 3 4 5)
Azrael23

See for Yourself. (Multi-page thread 1 2 3)
Azrael23

No resistance in China (Multi-page thread 1 2 3 4)
Azrael23

4 Attachment(s) Bush Loves Osama... (Multi-page thread 1 2 3 4 5)
Azrael23

Lies from your education... (Multi-page thread 1 2 3)
Azrael23

Gold may be high....but keep buying it. (Multi-page thread 1 2 3)
Azrael23

Coheed and Cambria
Azrael23

Poll: What would you do.... (Multi-page thread 1 2)
Azrael23

A question
Azrael23

Drug Companies Invent Diseases For Profit.
Azrael23

America, Worlds Biggest Debtor (Multi-page thread 1 2 3 4)
Azrael23

Don`t forget about...
Azrael23

90% must die to save the planet. (Multi-page thread 1 2 3)
Azrael23

Poll: D you support torture in the "war on terror" (Multi-page thread 1 2 3)
Azrael23

Poll: Can I be a Moderator? (Multi-page thread 1 2)
Azrael23

Chavez kidnapped by CIA...
Azrael23

-------------------------------

:rolleyes:
 
Azrael23 said:
I spent all day in the sun and I`m knackered! Plus everyones revising here because its exam season....campus is dead...nearest town....stoke-on-trent... :oops:
Which bit? Hanley?

(no wonder he doesn't get out much :D)
 
No foolios, Keele.

The most beautiful uni campus in the country, not to mention the biggest campus in Europe. :)

I stick by what I`ve posted, screw you all. Going down the list of topics i`ve posted, I thought they were pretty good. :)
 
Keele, like all unis built in the 60's is either near a motorway (like Keele or Lancaster) or out in the middle of nowhere (like York).

Nuff said.
 
You can`t dispute the beauty of a late spring keele. :cool:

As for the CNN business, the points raised concerning them just wanting to create a "good tv" debate is quite obviously ridiculous. If they wanted a good debate there are a million and one people who strongly disagree, as evidenced by this thread.
The point is that the people they tried to talk around are key people as far as 9/11 is concerned, rodriguez (the last guy out the rubble), Lawyer Philip Berg (big player in demanding public investigation) and philanthropist Jimmy Walters (NY truth leader).
They were trying to bribe them into saying they opposed sheens comments.
 
Azrael23 said:
They were trying to bribe them into saying they opposed sheens comments.
"Bribe them", how exactly?

Or rather, I should ask: "what does prisonplanet say?" because you'll swallow any old bollocks posted up on that laughable bag'o'shite.
 
Azrael23 said:
They were trying to bribe them into saying they opposed sheens comments.

With money??

Let's have a link, even to your David Icke love-in websites, that suggest any money being offered in order to provide an opposing opinion to Sheen.

Just one link.
 
I hope it does though.

Because I can check these things, at the moment.

Because of where I work.

;)

So come on Azrael - let's have one little linky to this "bribe" allegation, or just admit you are talking porkie-pies.
 
editor said:
Err, that's how TV debates work. A room full of people agreeing with each other doesn't exactly make for compelling TV.

But no need to take my word for it -try watching the news or any current affairs program and see what people are saying!

Why you swallow up and regurgitate this pitiful non-story from the laughable prisonplanet is anyone's guess.

Why not try thinking for yourself?
They weren't having Sheen on the show though, silly - they just wanted others in the truth movement to discredit him.

pk you must have worked hard compiling that list. But then we know character assassination is your hobby around here. :p
 
editor said:
"Bribe them", how exactly?

Or rather, I should ask: "what does prisonplanet say?" because you'll swallow any old bollocks posted up on that laughable bag'o'shite.
I think Azrael23 was referring to airtime on mainstream media - something far more precious to these guys than money, certainly that's the case with Jimmy Walter.
 
Jazzz said:
I think Azrael23 was referring to airtime on mainstream media - something far more precious to these guys than money, certainly that's the case with Jimmy Walter.
So, your proof of the "bribing".....?

Credible source?
 
Jazzz said:
They weren't having Sheen on the show though, silly - they just wanted others in the truth movement to discredit him.

And do YOU know anything about this, or are you just doing you usual trick of taking anything some random lunatic says and in your gullible way swallowing it up like a Swedish sword-swallower auditioning for Opportunity Knocks?


pk you must have worked hard compiling that list. But then we know character assassination is your hobby around here. :p

I hardly have to assassinate Azrael23's character, really, do I?

I just prod it with an HB pencil now and then, you get the odd groan if you're lucky, but he was dead on arrival, my ivory-tinkling, not-an-inkling chum.
 
I am thinking perhaps, any minute now, Azrael23 will return to this thread and state that " CNN caught out" was in actual fact a reference to the amateur cricket match taking place in Dorking the other week, where famed and noble batsman Corporal Nigel Nutkins fell into the classic sidespin trap and the six he hoped for was siezed mid-air by the silly mid-on.

I'll bet he was buying shandy for the whole team as a result, come refreshments.

What do you think, Jazzzbot?
 
pk said:
I am thinking perhaps, any minute now, Azrael23 will return to this thread and state that " CNN caught out" was in actual fact a reference to the amateur cricket match taking place in Dorking the other week, where famed and noble batsman Corporal Nigel Nutkins fell into the classic sidespin trap and the six he hoped for was siezed mid-air by the silly mid-on.

Wot Nigel "Nutty" Nutkins? Lost track of him since he left Kent CCC.
 
zArk said:
I think they best grab this firefighter along with Charlie Sheen cause

pardon me?
Nothing to do with the complete chaos and confusion going on at the time because every single person knew exactly what was going on, eh?

:rolleyes:
 
Azrael23 said:
As for the CNN business, the points raised concerning them just wanting to create a "good tv" debate is quite obviously ridiculous. If they wanted a good debate there are a million and one people who strongly disagree, as evidenced by this thread.
The point is that the people they tried to talk around are key people as far as 9/11 is concerned, rodriguez (the last guy out the rubble), Lawyer Philip Berg (big player in demanding public investigation) and philanthropist Jimmy Walters (NY truth leader).
They were trying to bribe them into saying they opposed sheens comments.
Look, it's fairly simple, 9/11 survivor says "Charlie sheen is a fruitbasket" is likely to attract more viewers than Somebody agrees with Charlie Sheen about something.

It's all marketting.

And you have yet to explain exactly what CNN's motivation is for covering up what would be the biggest story in recent American history.
 
editor said:
Nothing to do with the complete chaos and confusion going on at the time because every single person knew exactly what was going on, eh?

:rolleyes:

jeeze, if i was in court you would be the cross-examination and i would be the heckler at the back :D
 
zArk said:
jeeze, if i was in court you would be the cross-examination and i would be the heckler at the back :D
So has this fireman spoken about this "bomb" since? No? Whyever not?

Could it just be he was repeating one of the many false rumours that circulated during the chaos and confusion of the day?

You tell me. You posted up the link. Now tell me what's it's supposed to prove.
 
zArk said:
jeeze, if i was in court you would be the cross-examination and i would be the heckler at the back :D

Care to explain this? " You would be the cross-examination"...I think you mean prosecution barrister....non?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom