Rushy
basically a scrotum
I shouted "Love LTNs" at them at 4.55 but I'm Scottish and not to be messed with.
Sorry - was that "eleven"?
I shouted "Love LTNs" at them at 4.55 but I'm Scottish and not to be messed with.
Clearly yõu have no idea of reality whatsóever.Is there a maximum size of shop you can visit then? It must be nearly 100 yards from the disabled parking spaces to the back of Tesco and presumably places like shopping malls are out of the question - somewhere like Westfield must be 500m from end to end?
But what do you do once you get into the store? or do they let you take your car up and down the aisles?The disabled bays at Tesco's Acre Lane are âbout 20 yards from the store entřance.
Cyclists should have to pay towards costs of Cycle Lanes - and I don't wanna here grit about WE ALL PAY ALREADY!
Why not BŮTT OŮT of things that you have Naff ll knowledğe of¿
ŮĢH!
Secónd wôrd is OFF Dearié.But what do you do once you get into the store? or do they let you take your car up and down the aisles?
I don't know what you tried but that hasn't fixed your keyboard problem, or answered the question.Secónd wôrd is OFF Dearié.
ÝÙĶ!
I don't know what you tried but that hasn't fixed your keyboard problem, or answered the question.
I don’t think it was an outright rejection just a daunting realisation, that ppl on the outside of the LTN grid were experiencing disadvantages from day one and these unwelcome changes got ‘worse’ but voices ‘in side’ the LTN (who appeared to be way ahead of the game) brushed off these concerns as ‘some inconvenience’ so an obvious resentment grew which changed to incredulity as the examples of prior LTN success being quoted at residents were revealed to be so dreadful! Waltham Forest 1% reduction in traffic with a 53% reduction in business revenue! ( one examp) So who flogged this to local council & residents that they are so roundly impressed with such evidence and their neighbours are considered ungrateful or divisive for not going along with it?Agree, that Lambeth did not/are not consulting before putting in the temporary schemes - there has not been time to do this - as we know consultations can take years...
I guess the way I read 'a more permanent LTN' is different. Some measures might actually work in reducing traffic without major knock on effects and these could be kept. What I find sad is this outright rejection of something which could improve residents lives - not even wanting to try something different for the sake of the future generations.
But I also agree that the way the 'PR' has been handled by Lambeth is terrible and has not helped the situation. But hey, after 25 years in the borough, I've sort of come to expect this.
Again: not true.Waltham Forest 1% reduction in traffic
Is that the besť yøu cañ dø Dearię¿
Ůģh!
Thanks. It was a non de plume but I've deleted it anyway.I don't think you're allowed to post IRL names here wurlycurly. Suggest you delete if that's true...
It’s already displacing Traffic! Ask them on Milkwood, Coldharbour, Acre Land! And there is barely any Traffic in London at the moment many ppl still away.Although LTN are already causing chaos at many times of the day! Fiire Engine stuck OneFerndale LTN,yesterday & a local GP on camera calling out poor LTN planning and extreme difficulty for her and her district nurses. You are determined to leave any criticism of LTN unaddressed! The concerns they raise are not going away however much you wish they would.No, it doesn't.
It also doesn't prove that there will be no problems with displaced traffic.
It's just a record of the actual situation at a certain time on a certain day.
When we're all in our 90s and arguing about whether a liveable neighbourhood scheme should be implemented somewhere around brixton and someone says but don't you remember back in 2020 when they tried the railton road one and there was constant traffic chaos for weeks I'll quote that post and say no, it was mainly just that the anti camp won the twitter propaganda battle and lambeth bottled it before we could see the real results.
It's not just the implementation, these schemes are intended to be divisive. The explicit aim is to frustrate local drivers out of their cars. The health & wellbeing benefits are mostly for insiders, though not spread evenly, as insiders with disabilities or mobility restrictions are particularly aggrieved about the effect on them. Anticipated financial gains are reserved for insider homeowners and landlords. Additional pressure on the surrounding arteries means those who live or work there are likely to see their quality of life fall.It's such a shame that something that aims improve the quality of life for people has become so devisive by the way it's been implemented
Yes! And?? That’s exactly what that nurse does and she and many other health care professionals are very concerned about a scheme that pushes more pollution on to already polluted residential main roads! She is doing her job she alone pointed out Lambeth had not produced an EIA and the one they subsequently then cobbled together is inadequate and is being looked into by disabilities charities currently. A GP on Ferndale LTN yesterday, just like our nurse resident, was on camera yesterday calling out how the LTN’s disadvantage disabled, sick & dying neighbours in her community. Stop brushing ppls concerns under the carpet they are genuine.There’s one worker for a local hospital / NHS trust who is very against it. Turns out they’re the local physical activity champion tasked with delivery a community health programme where one of its main delivery methods is promoting active travel (walking and cycling as part of an social prescription programme).
The explicit aim is to frustrate local drivers out of their cars.
I've been browsing Eno's twitter posts. Non-stop stream of insane, racist, misogynistic, anti-Scottish bile.
YUK
[/QUOTE
Reported.
I recommend you APOLOGISE for calling me a RACIST.
Your comments are libellous .
You are also in breach, inter alia, of the Terms of Use of this platform.
It appearś wurlycurly makes å habit of postiņg inapprõpriate, illegal, libelous cańt.Thanks. It was a non de plume but I've deleted it anyway.
Self-important and presumptuous to think anyone cares enough about what you think to act on this. If you have something to report or something you want to share, go ahead, otherwise it's just smearing someone you disagree with.I've been browsing Eno's twitter posts. Non-stop stream of insane, racist, misogynistic, anti-Scottish bile.
YUK
ABSŐLŮTELY TRUĖ.Self-important and presumptuous to think anyone cares enough about what you think to act on this. If you have something to report or something you want to share, go ahead, otherwise it's just smearing someone you disagree with.
Well sparkybird your community has 1000’s of voices and they may not all dovetail into ‘perfect’ measured presentation, but none the less they all want clean green schemes to walk cycle and live with clean air, but when communities know they are repeatedly being handed the ‘shitty end’ of the stick they are not fools. What so frustrating is Lambeths slow peeved inabilities to acknowledge this! Many of Those deeply committed to the scheme have gone out of their way to belittle and marginalise those who have concerns. Still no one knows the metrics for success we are repeatedly linked Waltham Forest report which talks of overall improvement to car journeys as 1% is that what Lambeth have bought into? Schools streets/timed bollards/ play streets/ electric cars & busses/ Speed cams everywhere at 20mph. and not schemes where councillors & MPs trash their neighbours& constituents.I dunno Brassed off , I see alot of these petitions and groups calling for LTNs to to stopped, which to me seems like a rejection.
Some of the language I find quite alarming... comparing it to like living in a dictatorship, Communist country, being 'kettled' etc.
It's such a shame that something that aims improve the quality of life for people has become so devisive by the way it's been implemented
Excellent stuff!Well sparkybird your community has 1000’s of voices and they may not all dovetail into ‘perfect’ measured presentation, but none the less they all want clean green schemes to walk cycle and live with clean air, but when communities know they are repeatedly being handed the ‘shitty end’ of the stick they are not fools. What so frustrating is Lambeths slow peeved inabilities to acknowledge this! Many of Those deeply committed to the scheme have gone out of their way to belittle and marginalise those who have concerns. Still no one knows the metrics for success we are repeatedly linked Waltham Forest report which talks of overall improvement to car journeys as 1% is that what Lambeth have bought into? Schools streets/timed bollards/ play streets/ electric cars & busses/ Speed cams everywhere at 20mph. and not schemes where councillors & MPs trash their neighbours& constituents.
Yesterday's protest looks like it was a bit underwhelming.