thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
Loving the objections to this from the usual suspects. Having previously said anyone living within a "gentrified" LTN should have all the parking removed they're now being outraged that some parking has been removed on what they describe as the 'gentrified' Elm Park. (where the Post Office long had a reputation for being robbed to the extent a few years back a local postman friend advised not living on Elm Park because it wasn’t safe(!) As well as the outrage that parking near shops is being removed I've also seen objections that the area outside them doesn't need to be improved because they're just shops for local people.
And someone who wants the entire scheme removed (putting >3000 vehicles per day back onto Upper Tulse Hill and Roupell Road, which have estates on both sides) is objecting because making this bit of Elm Park one way will mean a handful of homes will have a slightly different route to Brixton Hill.
By the way - marked disabled bays are for residents (and since the spaces being removed are not occupied in any google streetview images suspect the people they were for are long gone. They tend to outstay their need as it needs a traffic order to remove them so time and cost for council means they stay until a larger project happens). Blue badge holders don't need marked bays to visit since they can park in resident bays or on yellow lines (so long as they don't cause an obstruction). So that objection is nonsense as well.
mad
Last edited: