I guess it could. But I doubt it would be a net benefit to the majority of working class people.I didn’t say that. I said it could be beneficial in some circumstances. I’m off to bed anyway before the pile on starts. Have fun eh?
Well yes it is, he may have been advised to strip her of her citizenship but for all we know he may have been advised the exact opposite but ignored that advice to make a political point.Well it's not really the personal decision of one person, is it.
The ultimate decision required his signature but there will have been scores of security service people, policy advisors, legal folk, etc..
And of course, the decision has now been upheld by 2 courts and an independent commission.
Well yes it is, he may have been advised to strip her of her citizenship but for all we know he may have been advised the exact opposite but ignored that advice to make a political point.
It doesn't matter what he was advised he didn't have to follow it and couldn't be held accountable.
Such as criminals like drug dealers and rapists who prey on working class communities using these rules to never be removed from those places.
The fuck you dribbling on about? Idiot.If it makes bimble feel better, then prior to 2003 deprivation of citizenship was only allowed for naturalised citizens, when it became permissible to apply deprivation of citizenship of British born citizens that can hold dual citizenship.
So the trend seems to be towards a more equal application of the power.
The fuck you dribbling on about? Idiot.
It only looks like a more equal application of the power if you're so fucking stupid you don't understand what you're typingIf it makes bimble feel better, then prior to 2003 deprivation of citizenship was only allowed for naturalised citizens, when it became permissible to apply deprivation of citizenship of British born citizens that can hold dual citizenship.
So the trend seems to be towards a more equal application of the power.
It's all here on this thread. All covered already. Not a new piece of wisdom from you.That it used to a power limited only to naturalised citizens and then it was extended to some of those born in the UK.
And therefore there is the option to apply it more equally than prior to 2003.
I studied this back in the day, but its all there for you to read up on.
It's all here on this thread. All covered already. Not a new piece of wisdom from you.
There is nothing equal about the new powers and the way they apply to people differently depending purely on their ancestry. This doesn't negate anything bimble has said.
Maybe you could prepare that civics class to educate kids about the status of their citizenship?Comparisons to Nazi Germany now. I suppose the only surprise is that it’s taken 200 pages.
Why does it have to be at school?Maybe you could prepare that civics class to educate kids about the status of their citizenship?
They're not all equal, are they? So how would you go about explaining it?
Let's say you're a teacher at a school in Bethnal Green. Let's say it's the school Shamima Begum attended.
It could just be issued with your birth certificate & parents duty to explain it.Why does it have to be at school?
So the trend seems to be towards a more equal application of the power.
How else do you ensure children know their lack of rights?Why does it have to be at school?
Do schools teach people about their rights? It certainly wasn't my experience, and things have become rather more complicated in the period since I left school with the importance of eg data rights and so on. Since people don't seem to be taught how to write essays at school, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if rights were passed over in silence.How else do you ensure children know their lack of rights?
You could safely save it for secondary school, I think. That way the kids will be old enough to understand how this is all totally fair and reasonable.
Which relies on parents knowing about such things. From whence will they derive that information?It could just be issued with your birth certificate & parents duty to explain it.
Comparisons to Nazi Germany now. I suppose the only surprise is that it’s taken 200 pages.
How else do you ensure children know their lack of rights?
You could safely save it for secondary school, I think. That way the kids will be old enough to understand how this is all totally fair and reasonable.