emanymton
A cat politely sat on the flaming gardener.
Isn't Geoghegan, a representative of real capital?Yes, 95%. Easy. Not silly PR people. Real capital.
Isn't Geoghegan, a representative of real capital?Yes, 95%. Easy. Not silly PR people. Real capital.
No. And if he is - how mcuh does he represent?Isn't Geoghegan, a representative of real capital?
It'll do more to smash it than voting for it.Implying, but not actually saying for fear of ridicule, that voting to leave will somehow help dismantle fortress Europe.
It'll do more to smash it than voting for it.
Excellent. Tell that tale next time that you're in calais. There has been a real change over the last 30 years. It's real and it's driven by the EU.European border controls have survived the existence of Switzerland outside the big tent, and Switzerland is at the very heart of mainland Europe. The UK is peripheral and in terms of the logistics of controlling movement of people into the continent from the south and east it is largely irrelevant. Nobody travels to Germany from Syria or Eritrea via the Orkneys. Fortress Europe will continue with or without us. To suggest anything else is disingenuous in the extreme.
Excellent. Tell that tale next time that you're in calais. There has been a real change over the last 30 years. It's real and it's driven by the EU.
If the xenophobes get the upper hand shit will happen. Stop deferring to abstracts like 'capital'. This is about real people.The workers that capital needed in the UK before are not going to be expelled.
So tonight we have
1)vote eu to smash the anti-immigration plans of the eu (because i like immigration) and
2)because the eu won't expel people who aren't being expelled.
The EU isn't going to immediately fall apart. They'll find another way to try to do fortress europe. That aim will be significantly hampered by the fatal blow deal by the UK exit. The hard concentration on the needs of refugees rather than anyone else - why?And the EU minus Britain will stop all this nasty behviour? They'll take a brexit vote as a clear statement of moral outrage at the treatment of migrants and, in their shame, proceed to start tearing down fences left right and centre?
Even if the EU disintegrated altogther, the end result would be two dozen fortresses instead of one. Ask yourself which of those two scenarios you'd rather find yourself in, if you were a migrant coming to Europe?
If the xenophobes get the upper hand shit will happen. Stop deferring to abstracts like 'capital'. This is about real people.
That aim will be significantly hampered by the fatal blow deal by the UK exit.
What a very silly thing to say. Capital isn't real? Greece isn't real? My life isn't real? Fuck off.If the xenophobes get the upper hand shit will happen. Stop deferring to abstracts like 'capital'. This is about real people.
The hard concentration on the needs of refugees rather than anyone else - why?
What a very silly thing to say. Capital isn't real? Greece isn't real? My life isn't real? Fuck off.
ER no, vote eu = vote to stay. A vote for the eu.There is no 'vote EU' on the ballot. There is an option for the UK to stay in the EU given that it already exists and will continue to do so no matter what we do. This is a pretty clear distinction which you seem to be ignoring on purpose.
Capital has one single imperative - it has to follow it. It's not a person. Not a individual moral choice.Capital is not a single tangible entity with a single grand plan. This isn't a Terry Pratchett novel, it's the real world.
But in the electoral game the EU has thrice shown willing to shit on democratic principles. Why keep it with them.
You only seem to post about that - nothing else. It's almost the opposite of internationalism.Please quote the post where I state that I don't care about people other than refugees.
thats a fight we can and have had. Its winnable.Because our own government is equally happy to shit all over democracy?
This is as abstract as it can be - unless you are saying vote to stay.If the xenophobes get the upper hand shit will happen. Stop deferring to abstracts like 'capital'. This is about real people.
thats a fight we can and have had. Its winnable.
I'm so glad we made the poll tax revolt about how it would play out in the tory or labour party. Their internal battles are ded something to concentrate on. Not any independent politics.Bearing in mind that a leave vote will strengthen the hand of the most right wing tories and all but hand the keys to the kingdom to one B. Johnson.
Well non technicaly at the moment. But until recently he was the chief executive of one of the world's largest Banks. Which is a pretty major bit of capital.No. And if he is - how mcuh does he represent?
Vote EU to stop my friends false fears an all that and being nasty and like nasty people and not being like nasty and the nasty people.
You need to work out what is 'wrong' here' or something. Or why a non-representative individual means something.Well non technicaly at the moment. But until recently he was the chief executive of one of the world's largest Banks. Which is a pretty major bit of capital.
Anyway to return to my original point. Those who run the system, don't always make the right choice regarding what is in the best interest of capital. Geoghegan is an example of that, as from the perspective of his class position he is wrong to want to leave the EU.
You almost did 10 posts arguing a position in a row there frank. Silver.It's quicker if you just mash the keyboard at random with your fists. Rest assured the effect will be the same.