She doesn't speak for me, I love an election.This woman speaks for us all
She doesn't speak for me, I love an election.This woman speaks for us all
Likewise.She doesn't speak for me, I love an election.
She doesn't speak for Kuennsberg.This woman speaks for us all
Surprise, surprise May not going to ask for resignationsLikewise.
Amber Rudd, David Gauke, Greg Clark, David Mundell and Claire Perry given as Cabinet members that abstained.
Ministers who voted against the whip tonight will be expected to resign, those who abstain *will not*.
Weak and wobblySurprise, surprise May not going to ask for resignations
Could you share it, I’ve been asleep.I've been away for a couple of hours and just read a report on what they've done tonight and I, genuinely, can't understand it. What the actual fucking fuck.
I've been away for a couple of hours and just read a report on what they've done tonight and I, genuinely, can't understand it. What the actual fucking fuck.
Surprise, surprise May not going to ask for resignations
My head simply won't absorb where the fuck we are up to now, but presumably May will have another go at getting her shitpile through. That brings Bercow centre stage though as he was musing today about having a decision to make on whether to allow the same resolution to be put twice. He's obviously up for it as he's fucked May over a couple of times, but I doubt he's got the balls to do that. Has he?
The Mail. It's always the Mail.So, let's reduce this to something that simpletons like me can understand: which newspaper will be most apoplectic after tonight?
The Express:The Mail. It's always the Mail.
Nah Express. Mail has wound back to May loyalism.The Mail. It's always the Mail.
It was a pun. Sorry.Abstaining, rather than vote against what they believe to be disastrous for the country they presume to govern.
Some of the ERG starting to wobble
a 'self plagiarism' rule.there was a report somewhere this afternoon (which I now can't find) suggesting that there's some obscure parliamentary rule that government can't just bring back the same thing for another vote (yesterday was in theory at least deal mk 2) so they can't just have a repeat of the vote on the deal in the hope of getting it through at third attempt...
Lack of other options, party loyalty, just wanting this to be over, etc. The "WTO utopia" isn't "a thing of the past" the motion passed tonight had no legal force.I can't see her deal ever getting through even if all the ERG lined up behind it. At this point, if you are a loyal Tory MP who wants a soft Brexit why would lend your vote to that deal just being the ERG who've screwed your government into the dirt are shitting it that their WTO utopia is thing of the past.
First the government argue that yesterday's vote wasn't the same as January's as the deal had changed. Second it's at the discretion of the Speaker. I don't see Bercow refusing another vote on May's deal under the current circumstance. And if he did, they'd make just enough (meaningless) changes to make sure it was a "new" matter being voted on.there was a report somewhere this afternoon (which I now can't find) suggesting that there's some obscure parliamentary rule that government can't just bring back the same thing for another vote (yesterday was in theory at least deal mk 2) so they can't just have a repeat of the vote on the deal in the hope of getting it through at third attempt...
By the way, when does Corbyn makes his ever so cunning lightining strike (inside or outside the house)? To be honest, there's more chance of Theresa Fucking May getting something through before he does that.