fogbat
The Talibum
To be quite serious, there are lots of people who have died as a result of someone else's intoxication.
What an excellent argument.
Let's just enforce a national alcohol ban, just to be on the safe side.
To be quite serious, there are lots of people who have died as a result of someone else's intoxication.
Why do you need a drink on the tube? The journeys are that short?
I have never, ever, ever in 30 years of catching the tube had a can of beer "shoved in my face" and clearly you haven't either.People might rightly find having a can of beer shoved in their face sick making and just abit rude.
What an excellent argument.
Let's just enforce a national alcohol ban, just to be on the safe side.
After all, does the mother really need to make that journey to the park?
Why do you need a drink on the tube? The journeys are that short?
Quite apart from what Fogbat said I often used to sink a few cans on the way to gigs etc, saves money.
Meanwhile, somewhere up in the skies, a flight attendant is getting thumped after someone has drunk "good alcohol".
And on another flight a couple of drunk daft bints are trying to open the door for some air.
Not in the vast majority of places there aren't ...There are by laws about drinking on the street, anyhow.
You lot may laugh about bints, but since the ban how many times have you had laughing gangs of tube drinkers spray shaken-up Special Brew all over you, making you smell like a particularly careless alcoholic just before you meet with the head of the Bank of England? None. Therefore the ban is working. QED.
You might laugh, but I was on the way to an important meeting yesterday and sat down in the carriage only to discover that my seat was virtually a Special Brew bath after the entire contents of at least four cans had been carelessly spilt into the fabric by butter-fingered louts. Strangely enough, I couldn't see or smell a thing until I'd sat down into the moist, bubbling cauldron of stale 'Brew.You lot may laugh about bints, but since the ban how many times have you had laughing gangs of tube drinkers spray shaken-up Special Brew all over you, making you smell like a particularly careless alcoholic just before you meet with the head of the Bank of England? None. Therefore the ban is working. QED.
You might laugh, but I was on the way to an important meeting yesterday and sat down in the carriage only to discover that my seat was virtually a Special Brew bath after the entire contents of at least four cans had been carelessly spilt into the fabric by butter-fingered louts. Strangely enough, I couldn't see or smell a thing until I'd sat down into the moist, bubbling cauldron of stale 'Brew.
And if that wasn't bad enough, I had drinkers pushing their stinking , obnoxious cans right into my face for the entire duration of the journey and when I got up to leave, I slipped on the many puddles of puke and hit my head on one of the hundreds of empty bottles rolling around.
Thank goodness Boris is going to sort this out.
this thread is so funny i just burnt my dinner
the pro ban people have yet to make a decent argument imo
I can't help thinking you were missing something. After winning, you shove the brew in someone's face, piss in the empty can, and finally throw up?
This thread reminded me of a great game we used to play on the tube called "cane that brew" it's based on the "name that tune" game ..you need around 5-6 of you to play..all get 4 cans of special brew per player and state how many tube stops it will take you to drink a can..eg.. first guy may say "I'll cane that brew in 4"..next guy may say they'll do it in one..so then you say "cane that brew"!..if the guy don't manage to drink the can before the next stop he gets a good kicking...great game to start your evening.
All I see is the "I want to do it" argument from the people who are opposed and when given decent arguments as I have, they simply ridicule them, they don't refute them, they can't prove them wrong, they don't explain why their desire to drink alcohol overrides them.