Boris Sprinkler
Dont be scared
That's not the agenda the sun is pushing though is it? It's escalated moral panic in order to distract.
Well it had to happen one day, but that's for finding the one t-shirt on the Internet I didn't want...
I don’t think compulsive sexual behaviour is actually recognised as an addictionCompulsive sexual behavior is the same as the medical condition called addiction? Why did they not call it "sex addiction"? It's lazy reporting. there are compulsive sexual behaviours, but that is not the same as addiction. Compulsive sexual behaviours is what WHO recognize.
Who knows. One of the many ironies about Britain is that so many self declared royalists read The Sun. I can’t imagine a single member of the family have any fondness for the paper, or its role in profiting from their worst moments. Logically therefore, you’d assume that hardcore fans would be boycotting the worst of the tormentors of those they adore.not sure why their worried about the queen death coverage
are they worried she be offended as he was proved not to be a pedo
If they’re anything like the Mail, they also give an endless stream of positive Royal stories.Who knows. One of the many ironies about Britain is that so many self declared royalists read The Sun. I can’t imagine a single member of the family have any fondness for the paper, or its role in profiting from their worst moments. Logically therefore, you’d assume that hardcore fans would be boycotting the worst of the tormentors of those they adore.
Oh don’t. Someone will arrive to argue it’s wrongly named, and the fact that it was Mini Cheddars launched at someone’s head instead of a Golden Wonder multipack proves the crisp aisle is technically non existent.
Tbf that thread was pretty recent.Been here just under a year, but sussed the place out already.
I think you are confusing sex positive with perverts tbh. Yes I'm aware of how the term pervert has been used and misused historically.Lot's of us older folk are pervs. It's not necessarily a bad thing. I've been a perv since my teens and I'm in my 60s now. That said, if it turned out he was a kiddie fiddler (no evidence for that) or a workplace sex pest (I believe this has been alleged somewhere), then that would put a different somewhat different slant on things. But with what we "know" now though, I'm finding some of the moralistic outrage a bit stomach churning, to be honest.
Now you're being silly.I thought they were the genetically engineered variant of penguins that Pickman's Model was working on in order that they be able to eat the rich at a greater rate.
“Can you imagine the fall from grace of somebody like that - from being a hero to millions of people, and then the next moment to be reviled in the way that Huw has been? Imagine the effect on his family or his children, on his wife, or mother?”, he asks.
Simpson goes on to say he believes that the coverage from other parts of the press “feeds into a concerted political campaign in this country against the BBC".
He adds: "It's encouraged by the Murdoch newspapers, by The Telegraph and the Mail group, they want to see effectively the end of the BBC, they want to see it destroyed.”
It’s just that I kind of enjoyed watching that discussion develop. I should’ve been more careful when I said biscuit aisle, because I’m sure there are things there that fall into the cake or other categories, which probably invalidates the strictly biscuit definition.Been here just under a year, but sussed the place out already.
I think that inevitably the idea of being sex positive (as well as such terms as 'kink shaming', 'vanilla' etc) have and will continue to be used to defend sleazy and predatory behaviour. You basically end up in an endless arms race as terms are invented, adopted and misused.I think you are confusing sex positive with perverts tbh. Yes I'm aware of how the term pervert has been used and misused historically.
Yes sex positive can also be misused of course well done.I think that inevitably the idea of being sex positive (as well as such terms as 'kink shaming', 'vanilla' etc) have and will continue to be used to defend sleazy and predatory behaviour. You basically end up in an endless arms race as terms are invented, adopted and misused.
More widely, as soon as you have a big social push to say that a certain behaviour is ok (and even laudable), then there is pressure to do that. After all, if something is ok, why wouldn't you want to do it? What's wrong with you?
Yes I've seen sex positive folk shaming "vanilla" folk which is one way to massively miss the point.I think that inevitably the idea of being sex positive (as well as such terms as 'kink shaming', 'vanilla' etc) have and will continue to be used to defend sleazy and predatory behaviour. You basically end up in an endless arms race as terms are invented, adopted and misused.
More widely, as soon as you have a big social push to say that a certain behaviour is ok (and even laudable), then there is pressure to do that. After all, if something is ok, why wouldn't you want to do it? What's wrong with you?
Yes I've seen sex positive folk shaming "vanilla" folk which is one way to massively miss the point.
The naked man fears not the pickpocketYou can’t be blackmailed if you’ve nothing to hide.
But what about some other people? What about some other different circumstances? What about all the other things that have ever happened in the world? What about them?Which is really bad because vanilla people have never attempted to shame anyone over their sex lives.
Dating yourself there, Yosso.If they put it to a public vote I'll choose Gerry Adams
Yep totally agree this kind of whataboutary is absolute nonsense.But what about some other people? What about some other different circumstances? What about all the other things that have ever happened in the world? What about them?
I dunno where I come from the arsehole is called god's pocketThe naked man fears not the pickpocket
Nude man: only god can judge meI dunno where I come from the arsehole is called god's pocket
ET phone homeNude man: only god can judge me
But what about some other people? What about some other different circumstances? What about all the other things that have ever happened in the world? What about them?
So that makes it ok to shame people for being 'vanilla'? Is that what you're arguing? And if it isn't, what are you arguing?Of course, the language used in sex positivity has no relationship at all to the centuries long oppression of those who deviate from vanilla, monogamous heterosexual relationships. Silly me.
nooo, what are you arguing/attempting to trojan in...So that makes it ok to shame people for being 'vanilla'? Is that what you're arguing? And if it isn't, what are you arguing?