Jesus Christ, he's on The Moral Maze...
I don't like his hair.
And therein lies the weakness of his position. I'm not so sure that I could rely on the strength of his convictions if things kicked off. Mind you I'm not sure that I could rely on meself these days but at least I've got the hair for it.
poster boy of the new left and author of the bestselling politics book of 2011, Chavs: the Demonisation of the Working Class. He's on the train to Brighton to address the Unite conference. "There isn't going to be a bloody revolution in Britain, but there is hope for a society by working people and for working people," he counsels.
Back to the future with
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/04/the-return-of-marxism
Apparently the 1974 Labour manifesto is where it is all at. The Labour government of that period actually saw the living standards of the working class fall, unemployment rise and the far right grow.
He's claiming to have been mis-quoted in that on twitter, "A figure I never used. I said 'if you stand up for the bottom 70% they call you a class warrior' etc" which seems about right, but even still 70% seems awfully arbitrary.
Also, It's not it's the whole 1974 Labour manifesto, it's the phrase "Bring about a fundamental and irreversible shift in the balance of power and wealth in favour of working people and their families" that gets him going, which is just standard bennite stuff, but in abstraction it's a statement I can't disagree with. If our generation manages to halt the progress of neo-liberalism, and reverse it with fundamental shift in the balance of power towards the working class, then I'd consider that a great achievement. No, it wouldn't be socialist paradise, but it would be a the first major victory for the left following 30 years of decline and defeat.
Manifesto versus what actually happened situation.
Lets not go back to those days when a small army of well meaning leftists thought that drafting the Labour manifesto was actually meaningful only to see the Labour right refuse to implement most of it.
Oh what heights!He's articulate and he provides an entry point in the media for a slightly different narrative. That's god enough for me.
Oh what heights!
As he was valiant, I honour him. But as he was ambitious, I slew him.
Nothing. What do i want from you? Everything. Not, that'll do me, fancy a pint?What more do you want from him? He's a talking head.
he pretty much is articul8
You was moaning that he was skint and had to do this the other month - you've got a bit of a cheek.Minus the good looks, but with extra cash
Manifesto versus what actually happened situation.
Lets not go back to those days when a small army of well meaning leftists thought that drafting the Labour manifesto was actually meaningful.
Yeah, i bet you would. if you'e no idea about this financial circumstances why did you try and suggest he's raking it in?? I've no idea about his financial circumstances. I'd be willing to swap even so...
Nice to see your sources now. (*compares to lengthy list of attempted smears that you've made on basis of source*). Odd that you said before that he had to do this and would be on pretty much fuck all.he's bound to be - money from loads of Beeb appearances/Indie/Unite work - got to be doing alright. Guido Fawkes reckons he's paying top rate tax
he's bound to be - money from loads of Beeb appearances/Indie/Unite work - got to be doing alright. Guido Fawkes reckons he's paying top rate tax
Don't do ghastly labour things. But might do something more productive like sleepIt's the first Thursday in the month, he's probably got some ghastly labour thing at 8.