Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

BBC - Owen Jones

Well the problem is groups like "CoR" or "Unite the resistance" which are just pretty obviously top-down fronts. The proposed network would need to be both sufficiently broad to encompass all the aspects of anti-austerity politics AND a structure that was consciously open and pluralist. I'm not sayign it's going to be magically successsful. It will need sustained commitment from across the existing left and beyond - not just a token involvement.
 
That whole Progress milieu is filled with arseholes. Every time I see an article by Dan Hodges in the New Statesman, I know before I read it that it'll be puffing neo-Blairite ideas and rubbishing any other Labour current (snidely rather than openly). The spiritual heirs of Eric Hammond - rightists dressed up in vaguely leftist rhetoric.
Hodges is a weird fucker. He's well at home at the Torygraph, where idiot Tories call him "leftist scum". Little do they realise how much they have in common. :D
 
Well the problem is groups like "CoR" or "Unite the resistance" which are just pretty obviously top-down fronts. The proposed network would need to be both sufficiently broad to encompass all the aspects of anti-austerity politics AND a structure that was consciously open and pluralist.
A network being set up by media lefties like Jones will, by definition, be top-down. And what happens when your open structures mean that people decide to start attacking Labour, when you think it's too soon? Maybe you'll have to force these idiots to be pluralists.
 
A network being set up by media lefties like Jones will, by definition, be top-down. And what happens when your open structures mean that people decide to start attacking Labour, when you think it's too soon? Maybe you'll have to force these idiots to be pluralists.

That's why the piece is so dishonest Owen Jones has zero interest in actually getting a functional rooted network off the ground (I'd argue against it being 'national' after all what is the nation?)

The Coalition of Resistance is to all intents and purposes the biggest national anti-cuts network.

Here is their AGM:

25uthsm.jpg
 
no you were saying something totally different - that I was saying people "shouldn't bitch about Labour's anti-austerity agenda" - that was NOT what i was saying

"as long as it wasn't being sectarian towards the limited forces in Labour that are promoting the same anti-austerity agenda". Which reads as "don't bitch at people in Labour" unless you happen to believe that Labour has an identical agenda with regard to anti-austerity as non-partisans do (which we both know is NOT the case). Why does it read as "don't bitch about people in Labour"? Because those inside Labour who represent an anti-austerity agenda are NOT "anti-austerity" first and foremost, they're Labour first and foremost, and even you have represented them as such.
 
Articul8's flapping around about anti-labour candidates reminds me of this from him yesterday:

That's why some of the right wing on Twitter started to shit themselves and accusing him of wanting to launch a new party.

He's now the one 'shitting himself' and desperately seeking ground on which to argue against challenging labour candidates. Makes sense that people with the same interests argue the same things i suppose.
 
And you can have a peek at their agenda and resolutions:

53646478.jpg


A lot of people agree:

90454327.jpg


Including some famous faces:

42604956.jpg


Why do we need another one?
 
That's why the piece is so dishonest Owen Jones has zero interest in actually getting a functional rooted network off the ground (I'd argue against it being 'national' after all what is the nation?)
It seems to me - maybe I'm naive! - but if you want a locally-rooted grassroots network then you have to make sure it is owned by the grassroots, you have to see that it's initiated by local groups. This means that celebrities like Owen Jones will have to commit themselves to trying to build a network that they don't themselves entirely agree with, and submit to the priorities of anti-cuts groups.

On the other hand, certain lefties could just get together and create a "CoR for people like us"
 
But if they say they are anti-cuts before the election they must not face other anti-cuts candidates - right?

Shades of the Lib-Dem "we are totally against tuition fee rises" that metamorphosed into the opposite once they had power. Anyone who doesn't expect Labour to pull that one if they win the next GE is hopelessly naive, or pathologically-deranged.
 
It seems to me - maybe I'm naive! - but if you want a locally-rooted grassroots network then you have to make sure it is owned by the grassroots, you have to see that it's initiated by local groups. This means that celebrities like Owen Jones will have to commit themselves to trying to build a network that they don't themselves entirely agree with, and submit to the priorities of anti-cuts groups.

On the other hand, certain lefties could just get together and create a "CoR for people like us"
This is has been the thrust of my posts here - and i hope people have been picking up on that, because it seems to me that articul8 (and by extension his bubble) have already decided that they are the ones who own this vague proposal.
 
This is has been the thrust of my posts here - and i hope people have been picking up on that, because it seems to me that articul8 (and by extension his bubble) have already decided that they are the ones who own this vague proposal.
I just assumed you were worried that the Greens would suffer electorally
 
This is has been the thrust of my posts here - and i hope people have been picking up on that, because it seems to me that articul8 (and by extension his bubble) have already decided that they are the ones who own this vague proposal.

Not at all - first of all I'm asking whether there isn't a deficit between local self-initiated coalitions (like the one I'm an activist in) and bureuacratically co-ordinated fronts like CoR? Couldn't there be a national structure to reinforce and amplify the arguments and activities of open, democratic community coalitions against the cuts which would offer a united platform of people who make the case against austerity (I don't mean "too far too fast" austerity-lite). I don't see why this has to decide for or against standing candidates and make that a shibboleth (sorry Lynds!) - any more than it is for PCS or StWC.
 
When Labour get elected and start passing the exact same cuts as the coalition I suspect a lot of people will come to the conclusion Labour is irredeemable too. Everyone has their Ramsay MacDonald moment. I think I came to the conclusion Labour was irredeemable somewhere between the fall of Baghdad and the death of David Kelly.

For me it was 1994, and the replacement of clause 4 with some fluffy Blairite bollocks.

They already doing it, look and Wales and Scotland and practically every council in every Labour area I can think of. These anti-cuts councillors are few and far between, and besides even if there is loads of them, do you really think that they'd be able to compell a big chunk of the Labour party on a council-level to pull a Militant and start setting a needs budgets? Even if they could, local government is utterly dependant on government spending, the Tories have no shame in just suspending all of them. I notice Lenny McCluskey had some criticisms of Labour councillors who were more concerned with their careers than fight cuts, in that speech he did recently, but saying this stuff during your election campaign is very nice but is there any prospect of it happening? None that I can see.

Frankly, I've seen nothing to convince me that any ruling party within any local authority has members with enough grit to compile and propose a needs budget that will leave the councillors open to surcharge. 20 years ago, maybe, when we had councillors who weren't political careerists per se, but now? Most of them wouldn't risk a parking fine, let alone a multi-million pound personal surcharge.

I don't think making comparisons, and basing our actions on cargo cult imitation of what's going on in Greece, is a good thing either.
Agreed. Yes, Syriza is a good example of what can be done, within a particular polity, to resist. That really doesn't mean that such an example represents a "best possible hope" transplanted bodily to the UK, except for the "bottom-up" nature of the movement, something that I'm not convinced that Labour (or indeed articul8) would be too happy about.

All these anaologies between our situation and theirs aren't very helpful - we're not trapped in a overvalued currency and being held at gunpoint by Germany whilst our country is systematically ransacked. Our political parties and recent history are very different. All the same, if we must discuss this in Greek term, Owen Jones will have his Syriza-ish network once Labour start implementing neo-liberalism with a vengence post-2015. Whether he'll be in it or against it is upto him.

And on current form, he'll go along with Labour while sighing and chuntering about "the lesser of two evils".
 
Couldn't there be a national structure to reinforce and amplify the arguments and activities of open, democratic community coalitions against the cuts which would offer a united platform of people who make the case against austerity.
Genuine question based on my ignorance of UK politics: do these community coalitions you speak of already exist. Which group are you in, that you say is so much better than CoR?
 
Genuine question based on my ignorance of UK politics: do these community coalitions you speak of already exist. Which group are you in, that you say is so much better than CoR?
I'm in Brent Fightback - it is small and has serious work to do to engage a wider base of people - but it brings together the LRC, Greens, TUSC, SWP along with a local housing campaign, an unemployed workers campaign, NHS campaigners, Anti-Academy campaigners and a campaign to save a local pub/social space. Other than the question of elections (where TUSC want to stand, the Greens want to stand, LRC would be kicked out of the party if we supported them etc.) then it's going OK. But although we get covered occasionally in the local rag, there's nothing similar on a national scale.
 
I'm in Brent Fightback - it is small and has serious work to do to engage a wider base of people - but it brings together the LRC, Greens, TUSC, SWP along with a local housing campaign, an unemployed workers campaign, NHS campaigners, Anti-Academy campaigners and a campaign to save a local pub/social space. Other than the question of elections (where TUSC want to stand, the Greens want to stand, LRC would be kicked out of the party if we supported them etc.) then it's going OK. But although we get covered occasionally in the local rag, there's nothing similar on a national scale.
Sounds like a good group. What do the other people in Brent Fightback think of this Network idea? Won't the SWP in your local group want everyone to be in CoR? Again, practical problems.
 
CoR isn't SWP - that's Unite the Resistance :D And they aren't strong enough to push that through. I don't see the idea of a network as an alternative to a group like this - it would be about creating a framework of institutional support at a national level and have some form of national profile without the kind of unelected and unaccountable bureaucratic directives of a CoR/UtR
 
it would be about creating a framework of institutional support at a national level and have some form of national profile without the kind of unelected and unaccountable bureaucratic directives of a CoR/UtR

Let's get this straight you're saying Coalition of Resistance are 'unelected' and 'unaccountable' - yet they have an AGM where you stand on positions - I've posted pictures of it.
 
Is the surcharge still a thing?

Edit: no, been abolished.

Pickles gets to set the budget if needs budget is repeatedly set in face of warnings.
 
it's a valid question to pose - what kind of iniative could produce a viable network on a democratic basis that could be both pluralist and strategically coherent.
 
Dave Nellist responds to Owen Jones

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letters/letters-how-is-jihadism-our-fault-8462371.html

New alliances on the left
Whilst I understand his impatience, Owen Jones ("British politics urgently needs a new force", 21 January) is far too dismissive about attempts to build an electoral alternative to the main three parties' overlapping agenda of austerity.
Owen does not want "another party of the left to be built"; he wants Labour to change. Yet he limits his aspirations to a "network" outside Labour to pressurise it from the left (but leaving the same politicians in post).
His sideswipe against the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) is misplaced. We know TUSC is small at the moment; Owen, however, can't see the wood for the saplings. Yes, the average of our results, where we stood in a small number of council elections in 2011 and 2012, is only 7 per cent. This May, however, we hope to stand 400 candidates.
We are serious about putting together a stable coalition, rooted in the organisations and communities of working-class people, that re-popularises a socialist alternative.
Building a "network" that does not electorally challenge politicians, who only differ by the speed at which pain should be imposed on ordinary people, is simply not good enough.
Dave Nellist
Chair, the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition London E1

Very stirring. 400 candidates in May? However, don't rush to the barricades just yet, straight after that the Inde prints this:

Excellent article by Owen Jones. Having been a member of both the Socialist Alliance and the Socialist Party, I know how undemocratic the British left is. We will only get a new force when such parties are left to flounder and people are allowed to form their own alliances of co-operatives and community activism.
Robin McSporran
Bristol

So there ya go. Is it Left Unity time yet? Has someone called a conference?
 
Back
Top Bottom