Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Batley and Spen by-election

I imagine it is the campaigns she has led during that time; setting up the Jo Cox Foundation, chairing More in Common and leading the Great Get Together events.

I doubt most voters have even heard of any of that. I know I didn't before now.
 
It's normal to shed in a by-election, particularly when Galloway is on the prowl.
That's true, and a fair point...but that's why, earlier in the thread, I showed that Leadbeater's vote had contracted significantly more that could be accounted for by lower turnout. And, yes Galloway was there to take votes, but UKIP took a higher number of votes against Cox in 2015.
 
UKIP took a higher number of votes against Cox in 2015.
Why do you keep doing this? The turnout is well down on the 2015 general election - as is normal for a by election - so you can't just compare raw numbers as if they mean anything.

No one is suggesting that Leadbetter hasn't shed a load of votes. They're complaining about your partial presentation of figures to cast that vote shedding in the worst possible light.
 
Why do you keep doing this? The turnout is well down on the 2015 general election - as is normal for a by election - so you can't just compare raw numbers as if they mean anything.

No one is suggesting that Leadbetter hasn't shed a load of votes. They're complaining about your partial presentation of figures to cast that vote shedding in the worst possible light.
If a candidate sheds more votes than turnout explains and challenger candidates, that is noteworthy.
 
Turnout was 28% down which doesn't explain why Leadbeater's vote share fell by 41%, or why that was 10% (of popular vote share) worse that the Tories decline.

Not sure why those observations appear to be so controversial.
 
Back
Top Bottom