tim
EXPLODED TIM! (Help me!!!)
I can't imagine that there's a law against self-identifying as Honourable.Is he allowed/supposed to be calling himself The Honorable?
I can't imagine that there's a law against self-identifying as Honourable.Is he allowed/supposed to be calling himself The Honorable?
I can't imagine that there's a law against self-identifying as Honourable.
in his case, it could be considered false advertising
I was in court with a certain Lord Sefton. The magistrate did a double take at this huge Jamaican bloke but it was his name.dunno really
isn't 'the honourable [name] ' a title for younger sons of dukes and that sort of thing?
doesn't quite seem his territory.
whether it's technically an offence to use a title that hasn't been signed off by HM, i'm not sure. duke ellington, lord tanamo, prince buster and others seemed to get away with it...
MPs are either the 'honourable member for [constituency] or the 'right honourable...' and it's false advertising for most of the buggers
Bananas and Nutella.I wonder how many hours every day Galloway and his NazBol allies think angrily about anal sex?
I was in court with a certain Lord Sefton. The magistrate did a double take at this huge Jamaican bloke but it was his name.
I guess he would have been Private Major whereas a Mr Private who became a Major would be a Major Private which would presumably cause problems in the world of "call me Hon" Galloway.
Now you mention it, I am aware of someone (no longer with us) who had Prince as his first name
And of a (possible) distant relative who had Major as his first name, which must have caused some confusion when he got called up (and never moved from the rank of Private) in the 1914 war...
Without wanting to go to a case by case vetted by panel of experts situation. it's a contested area. Much like politics within the working classitself. Academics have never agreed on who or what is working class , and as capitalism changes job roles change . Even the concept of affluent workers isn't new. Surveys that rely on self identification show that the majority of people still view themselves as working class.
It is actually against HoC protocol. Even serving members shouldn't use it in writing, its only for referring to one another in the house itself.I can't imagine that there's a law against self-identifying as Honourable.
When was Galloway a Privy Councillor?View attachment 275483
No dog-whistling here, no sir-ee....
no, thats Right HonourableWhen was Galloway a Privy Councillor?
IIRC only those who have been are entitled to 'Honourable'.
Correct. I have edited.no, thats Right Honourable
I'm not sure, if the mood is of an angry electorate seeing Hancock's hypocrisy and Bojo's lack of action it could have an effect. Galloway is more a problem for Labour.Labour will be too clumsy and unsure of themselves to make any capital out of it. Expect a mild rebuke from Kieth followed by a bit of flagshagging because the proles love that shit.
Asian women do not seem particularly keen on him
That's interesting. Wonder who put those through.
I reckon Hon Colonel Mustard.That's interesting. Wonder who put those through.
Correct. I have edited.
The 'honourable' is bullshit then, typical of Galloway.
Sure he would appreciate that on his tongue with his Nutella and banana sandwiches.
I hope that no byelection lands here for some time. They don't deserve this.Saw Paul Mason was trending on Twitter. Had a quick look. Wish I hadn't.
Ugly stuff and shit politics on all sides.