cliche guevara
Well-Known Member
Yes. You have to wear special 3d glasses, they're polarised (so not like the old red & green glasses).
They can be worn over regular glasses easily.
Thanks
Yes. You have to wear special 3d glasses, they're polarised (so not like the old red & green glasses).
They can be worn over regular glasses easily.
I've just watched this on my laptop and despite the slow start I think the film deserves merit. The, Avatars, despite overwhelming odds, destroy those who use military might to defend corporate greed. Alway's good to see.
the glory of the visuals completely overcomes the paucity of the story telling.
this may be that movie tbh. you spend the first 30 mins or so getting used to bits of the film appearing over your shoulder, and the rest of it marvelling at how you feel so close to what's happening. it is very very good visually and it does make up for a "dancing with wolves" story, (similarly drawn out too).I really bet they don't though. I'm prepared to give it a shot but I've never seen a film that's looked so good it could get away with having a shit story.
I really bet they don't though. I'm prepared to give it a shot but I've never seen a film that's looked so good it could get away with having a shit story - or been anywhere near that.
I've seen films which have tried.
there wasn't anything on telly, granted. BUT you're missing the entire point of the film if you're watching it on a laptop.What's your problem? I needed cheering up after spending xmas eve and xmas day in an acute hospital ward and this did the job.
yes, i know what you mean, you get sucked into the world of Pandora pretty effectively don't you and the story is simple but it's there. i liked it as much/maybe more than District 9 tbh.People keep going on about Avatar being just "images" as if this was a slide show. Apart from the intricate way this world is designed and worked out, something that makes Avatar work for me is that unlike most directors working in big budget blockbusters today (Michael Bay, Stephen Sommers, Roland Emmerich, McG, Zach Snyder) Cameron is a director who can pull you into a story, invests a little bit in his characters and who can direct complex action sequences where you can actually see who does what to whom. Cameron may not be much of a writer (he really should co-write with someone else), but he is an old school director who knows how to structure a sequence and a film so it creates some tension and pays off on an emotional level.
With exception of the likable Star Trek and the smaller scale District 9 and Moon, every other sci-fi blockbuster this year was total dross and whatever Avatars flaws may be, it's still head an shoulders above Terminator Salvation, X-Men Wolverine, Transformers 2, GI Joe. Something like Watchmen may look pretty, but it really felt like filmed, disconnected comic book panels and not like a film to me.
cameron can at least present a coherent narrative, granted. transformers and star trek are impossible to follow - so much is sacrificed in the name of spectacle.People keep going on about Avatar being just "images" as if this was a slide show. Apart from the intricate way this world is designed and worked out, something that makes Avatar work for me is that unlike most directors working in big budget blockbusters today (Michael Bay, Stephen Sommers, Roland Emmerich, McG, Zach Snyder) Cameron is a director who can pull you into a story, invests a little bit in his characters and who can direct complex action sequences where you can actually see who does what to whom. Cameron may not be much of a writer (he really should co-write with someone else), but he is an old school director who knows how to structure a sequence and a film so it creates some tension and pays off on an emotional level.
With exception of the likable Star Trek and the smaller scale District 9 and Moon, every other sci-fi blockbuster this year was total dross and whatever Avatars flaws may be, it's still head an shoulders above Terminator Salvation, X-Men Wolverine, Transformers 2, GI Joe. Something like Watchmen may look pretty, but it really felt like filmed, disconnected comic book panels and not like a film to me.
you fecking prawn....also, i got much more emotionally involved with the characters in district 9 than in any other sci-fi spectacles i've seen in recent years.
you fecking prawn....
It is much more discrete but it's there, I had a carefull look at the glasses and it's still two different colours.No, it doesn't.
It is much more discrete but it's there, I had a carefull look at the glasses and it's still two different colours.
also, i got much more emotionally involved with the characters in district 9 than in any other sci-fi spectacles i've seen in recent years.
I've just watched this on my laptop and despite the slow start I think the film deserves merit. The, Avatars, despite overwhelming odds, destroy those who use military might to defend corporate greed. Alway's good to see.
District 9 is considered the underdog film and it keeps being brought up as superior to Avatar in many discussions about the films. I enjoyed it well enough, but it's just as derivative as Avatar. It's Alien Nation meets Cronenberg's The Fly, given the Cloverfield treatment. It has more of a sense of humor about itself, but its apartheid allegory is just as clunky as the "tree hugging" sentiments in Avatar.
In both films I thought the main alien character (Christopher 'the prawn', Netytiri) were pretty engaging.
As much as I enjoyed District 9, Avatar impressed me more visually. Although suppose it really is a different aesrhetic. A shanty=town on a rubbish dump filmed by handcam-style, or those virulent green smooth forests.
District 9 is much more than the obvious apartheid subtext, infact it's more to do with post Apartheid and the contradictions of liberalism.
District 9 is my movie of the year.
I liked District 9 more or less the same as Avatar and Star Trek. For a sci-fi action film it was pretty good, but I've seen quite a few films this year which I thought were far better.
I'm really not getting the Star Trek love fest, sure it was entertaining enough but instantly forgettable.
I loved Star Trek, thought it was better than Avatar or District 9 by a distance