Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Atos Medicals - Questions, Answers and Support

Hi,new to the site. Can I ask,what is the security like at these 'assessment centres'? I know the job centre has security staff, but is that the case for these assessment centres?. I have an anxiety condition which apart from other symptoms, means I get nervous of people in uniforms due to a traumatic event in the past.

Take a friend or relative with you. Firstly it will help with the anxiety. More importantly it seems that pretty much everyone who attends an assessment without a witness is declared fit to work.
 
hackedoff this next advice is going to sound odd but there is logic to it.

Don't get dressed up in a suit/nice outfit/ Be clean and presentable but don't make too much of an effort. There are several reports that making an effort with your appearance is being used against candidates as evidence that they are fit to work, even if making that effort ensures they will be spending the next week in bed recovering.

It is human nature that we want to present ourselves in a favourable light to those we meet for the first time, however it is clear that Atos take this as evidence of malingering even when getting to the assessment is a great personal cost to the claimant.

I would urge you again to consider requesting a home assessment.
 
hackedoff this next advice is going to sound odd but there is logic to it.

Don't get dressed up in a suit/nice outfit/ Be clean and presentable but don't make too much of an effort. There are several reports that making an effort with your appearance is being used against candidates as evidence that they are fit to work, even if making that effort ensures they will be spending the next week in bed recovering.

It is human nature that we want to present ourselves in a favourable light to those we meet for the first time, however it is clear that Atos take this as evidence of malingering even when getting to the assessment is a great personal cost to the claimant.

I would urge you again to consider requesting a home assessment.

It's quite an insult to people that to be clean and well-presented goes against you :mad::(
 
Has anyone else also noticed the apparent black hole that mysteriously consumes appeal evidence favourable to claimants when you ask the DWP for copies of correspondence and/or many other things that might cause the tribunals to rule against the DWP, perchance..?

Ditto their remarkable ability to provide multiple contradictory answers to the same simple questions depending on which person you ask and also their tendency to state that unhelpful conduct on their part is down to their rules while being utterly unable to tell you, when asked simply and clearly, exactly which of their rules they're obeying by being deliberately unhelpful and wilfully obstructive..?

Yep. Two letters have been apparently sent to us regarding our backdated HB and CTB and we have received neither.
Also another regarding HB that did arrive first class but it was 2 weeks after the date on the letter.
Sorry I know that is not directly ATOS related but thought it worth mentioning.
 
Yep. Two letters have been apparently sent to us regarding our backdated HB and CTB and we have received neither.
Also another regarding HB that did arrive first class but it was 2 weeks after the date on the letter.
Sorry I know that is not directly ATOS related but thought it worth mentioning.
Definitely worth mentioning kittyP, it's all part of the same problem.
 
hackedoff this next advice is going to sound odd but there is logic to it.

Don't get dressed up in a suit/nice outfit/ Be clean and presentable but don't make too much of an effort. There are several reports that making an effort with your appearance is being used against candidates as evidence that they are fit to work, even if making that effort ensures they will be spending the next week in bed recovering.

It is human nature that we want to present ourselves in a favourable light to those we meet for the first time, however it is clear that Atos take this as evidence of malingering even when getting to the assessment is a great personal cost to the claimant.

I would urge you again to consider requesting a home assessment.

The dick who did my assesment made a point of saying that the fact I was "well presented" was a contributory factor in my being awarded nul points.

I'd say wear your absolute worst clothes.
 

To be fair, this is someone who has less medical knowledge than most disabled people, no medical qualifications whatsoever, will brainlessly spout the party line regardless and probably earns more per quarter than most disabled claimants get in a year. So it's no great surprise that she has the bedside manner of an Army medical officer ('You're still breathing so you're obviously fit'), a total unwillingness to engage with the facts unless the facts are convenient for whatever crap she's spouting this week (in other words, a typical politician) and possesses all the heavyweight intellectual gravitas of a boiled potato.
 
To be fair, this is someone who has less medical knowledge than most disabled people, no medical qualifications whatsoever, will brainlessly spout the party line regardless and probably earns more per quarter than most disabled claimants get in a year. So it's no great surprise that she has the bedside manner of an Army medical officer ('You're still breathing so you're obviously fit'), a total unwillingness to engage with the facts unless the facts are convenient for whatever crap she's spouting this week (in other words, a typical politician) and possesses all the heavyweight intellectual gravitas of a boiled potato.

People do take that kinda bullshit in though.

And that article - "Just filling in a form and getting it (DLA) for life" - FFS, it should be illegal to allow lies such as that to float out unchallenged into the public consciousness.
 
People do take that kinda bullshit in though.

And that article - "Just filling in a form and getting it (DLA) for life" - FFS, it should be illegal to allow lies such as that to float out unchallenged into the public consciousness.

Then there's this one as well

900,000 choose to come off sickness benefit ahead of tests

Nearly 900,000 people who were on incapacity benefit dropped their claim to the payments rather than undergo a tough medical test, latest government figures show.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...come-off-sickness-benefit-ahead-of-tests.html
 

Are you deliberately trying to raise my blood pressure by posting these articles :D

In a way Shapps has got a point about IB being used as a way to hide unemployment, but it was the Tories who started doing that in the late 80's/early 90's. And anyway, long term unemployment is debilitating to ones health, so it makes sense for someone who, realistically, is likely to be unemployed for a long time to go on the sick rather than claim JSA with all it's attendant bullshit. And it was conservative policies that made long term unemployment part of the landscape of most communities in the UK, so really it's a case of reaping what you've sown.
 
Are you deliberately trying to raise my blood pressure by posting these articles :D

In a way Shapps has got a point about IB being used as a way to hide unemployment, but it was the Tories who started doing that in the late 80's/early 90's. And anyway, long term unemployment is debilitating to ones health, so it makes sense for someone who, realistically, is likely to be unemployed for a long time to go on the sick rather than claim JSA with all it's attendant bullshit. And it was conservative policies that made long term unemployment part of the landscape of most communities in the UK, so really it's a case of reaping what you've sown.

are you reading my mind or something? cause the use of IB to massage unemployment was the first thing that came to my mind as well
 
They didn't really choose though, did they? They chose NOT to put themselves through an extremely stressful experience despite knowing they would be financially much worse off. Hardly a choice when someone opts for being a lot poorer.

Yep, a friend of mine said she's absolutely no way going to an assessment. As far as she's concerned, all her doctors/consultants proof should be enough that she's not fit for work, and if they're going to ignore that evidence, she'd rather starve than go through dealing with ATOS
 
Yep, a friend of mine said she's absolutely no way going to an assessment. As far as she's concerned, all her doctors/consultants proof should be enough that she's not fit for work, and if they're going to ignore that evidence, she'd rather starve than go through dealing with ATOS

Which is what ATOS are hoping for - And if she dies during the interim then so much the better -That's the way the system's worked out now.
 
Yep, a friend of mine said she's absolutely no way going to an assessment. As far as she's concerned, all her doctors/consultants proof should be enough that she's not fit for work, and if they're going to ignore that evidence, she'd rather starve than go through dealing with ATOS

This is what my mum said to me.
She said that if all the ATOS business is all too much for me they will help us survive until Badgers is able to earn enough to cover things until I am better.
I would go down as a stat saying that I am off benefits and back to work when I wouldn't be.

Are their any stats for people that are in that position?
People that have had their benefits stopped/stopped claiming them but are not working (including JSA or not).
 
If only it were a "tough medical test", then more people would qualify. As it is, it's an arbitrary one-size-fits-all quasi-medical assessment of capability sometimes carried out by a doctor, but more often than not by a "healthcare professional" with little or no competence in disability/long-term ill-health.

Exactly - And the only bit that corresponds with medical/social security law is the tribunal bit - By which time a lot of claimants have fallen by the wayside for one reason or another.
 
Back
Top Bottom