Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Art that people rave about that's actually shit.

I thought the style of the time was to pluck off eyebrows ?

Good grief - no, Mona Lisa's eyebrows were cleaned off as part of an "oh shit, it's gone a bit tits up" conservation/cleaning attempt. The original painting had eyebrows. I thought everyone knew this?
 
Good grief - no, Mona Lisa's eyebrows were cleaned off as part of an "oh shit, it's gone a bit tits up" conservation/cleaning attempt. The original painting had eyebrows. I thought everyone knew this?

I didn't know that....it seems like light eyebrows really were in fashion for a long time, as well as high foreheads and sort of bulgy eyes :confused:
 
I didn't know that....it seems like light eyebrows really were in fashion for a long time, as well as high foreheads and sort of bulgy eyes :confused:

French collectors in the Napoleonic era and Victorian Brits were also a bit nuts about hacking willies off classical statues, that doesn't mean that ancient Greeks and Romans didn't have willies.
 
lonesome_boatman.jpg

Lonesome Boatman
Genius painter imo...:thumbs:

Nice, the boat is like a fish!

 
http://www.beautyblitz.com/history-eyebrows#slide-6


"Ye Olde EyebrowesWENDY RODEWALD-SULZ
Skinny brows were all the rage during medieval times in Europe, when women favored a pale, eggheaded look and plucked their hairlines to achieve it. The fashion continued through the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, whose bare brow and tweezed hairline enhanced the domed forehead and pallid complexion she painted with toxic white lead-based ceruse. During the 1600s, people rubbed walnut oil onto their children's eyebrows to inhibit hair growth."


Ne'er a fringe nor a raised eyebrow...:D
Thankfully the style didn't make a return lol
 
I can't say I really like anything you've posted either. It's not that I don't like it, they just seem more like illustrations and not artwork I would typically look at and go "wow!"
 
I can't say I really like anything you've posted either. It's not that I don't like it, they just seem more like illustrations and not artwork I would typically look at and go "wow!"

Well he's a figurative artist...:)
Not an abstract artist.
Different styles ..
Different tastes :)
 
I like plenty of figurative artists, very much so.

but yeah, I agree, which is why it's kind of ridiculous to start threads like this? :hmm:

Not really though..
By your own admission you effectively think Kavanagh, Gorky, Warren are not worth a "wow" (roughly translated as 'shit')
Yet they're raved about :)
So I'd say the thread is fine..:)
 
There's something empty about the Kavangh paintings. Glossy 90s brochure pictures. People with no character.

I also don't like the style or composition.
 
There's something empty about the Kavangh paintings. Glossy 90s brochure pictures. People with no character.

I also don't like the style or composition.

Yes ..... one of his recurring themes is the cold hardness of consumerism and the bleakness of modern society.
He has other art that is quite warm and soft...:)
 
Not really though..
By your own admission you effectively think Kavanagh, Gorky, Warren are not worth a "wow" (roughly translated as 'shit')
Yet they're raved about :)
So I'd say the thread is fine..:)

except that I would never say that (something was shit). I find the whole idea of doing so really very pretentious.
 
True I suppose... I did have a look at his website btw bubbles, I don't think any of them felt particularly warm.

He's not got all his work on his website. Only one exhibition is on his site...I think it's called "from womb to the grave?"
Plenty other paintings of his are in other galleries....
 
Back
Top Bottom