Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Art that people rave about that's actually shit.

There was no riddle. I posted shit art.
And I'm very much alive so get away with the "we"...

"Shit art" that nobody raves about (as per the op) 'cos you just made it up for the thread?

Was it initially meant to be some "critique" of abstract art that you've since thought better of?

Because that's how it looks to me...
 
humour me. tell me what your point is.

We're a long time dead bubblesmcgrath. Not the place for riddles and shenanigans and such. IYKWIM!

Maybe the two of ye could give each other the kiss of life
:D

28187-Picasso,%20Pablo.jpg
 
I can look at a Van Gogh and not know anything about it yet enjoy it and I can appreciate the landscape without knowing where it is. I dont need to know the artist's innermost thoughts or feelings. I can interact with the art. Knowing some more about the background to the painting helps me appreciate the artist and his struggles but doesn't necessarily effect my appreciation of the painting itself.

How can you know how you'd feel about Van Gogh from a position of ignorance? Certainly many of his contemporaries didn't manage to enjoy it.
 
I think the point being made is that it's impossible to approach a Van Gogh not knowing anything about it.

Could you explain what you mean by "approach"?
Are you saying that one cannot appreciate or like or enjoy it?
And what knowledge exactly does one need to know about it before "approaching" it?
 
Could you explain what you mean by "approach"?
Are you saying that one cannot appreciate or like or enjoy it?
And what knowledge exactly does one need to know about it before "approaching" it?

You can't appreciate a Van Gogh purely as a picture.
 
Back
Top Bottom