Don't suppose it's much new, but this article in the latest London Review of Books gathers together lot of stuff, in an almost enjoyable romp of a read. It's fairly long, but tbf it probably deserves to be.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n13/john-lanchester/are-we-having-fun-yet
couple of favourite bits:
on libor:
on standard chartered's 'defered prosecution'
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n13/john-lanchester/are-we-having-fun-yet
couple of favourite bits:
on libor:
In February this year, RBS was up. They paid $325 million to the CFTC, $150 million to the DoJ, and £87.5 million to the FSA, for a total of about £390 million. Well, I say ‘they’, but since the bank is 82 per cent owned by the taxpayer, the people paying this bill turn out to be us. Are we having fun yet?
on standard chartered's 'defered prosecution'
just retraction. that's all was needed.On 5 March this year, the chairman of the bank, Sir John Peace, said the following clunky thing: ‘We had no wilful act to avoid sanctions; you know, mistakes are made – clerical errors – and we talked about, last year, a number of transactions which clearly were clerical errors or mistakes that were made.’ This made the regulators furious, and in Sir John’s next statement on the subject, 16 days later, he said that he and the bank retracted ‘the comment I made as both legally and factually incorrect. To be clear, Standard Chartered unequivocally acknowledges and accepts responsibility, on behalf of the bank and its employees, for past knowing and wilful criminal conduct in violating US economic sanctions, laws and regulations.’ This was described in the
FT
as ‘the most abject apology that City pundits can remember hearing from a banker in recent times’, and their story reporting it contained a link to the Clash playing ‘I fought the law.’ The DoJ made it clear that without the retraction, the bank would have been prosecuted.