Thank youAnd also some people do it from choice and not from conscription or economic necessity. And they shouldn't be demeaned for doing so. Far worse to become a copper out of choice!
Thank youAnd also some people do it from choice and not from conscription or economic necessity. And they shouldn't be demeaned for doing so. Far worse to become a copper out of choice!
But, if you believe sex work is damaging to women as a whole, why would you not criticise women who choose to be involved in it?And also some people do it from choice and not from conscription or economic necessity. And they shouldn't be demeaned for doing so. Far worse to become a copper out of choice!
The root of why many people don't approve of genuinely chosen sex work can probably be found in religion. They even call any such sex workers the "handmaidens of patriarchy". Why else would that imagery even occur to them?Thank you
I suppose it depends on what you think "women as a whole" should be.But, if you believe sex work is damaging to women as a whole, why would you not criticise women who choose to be involved in it?
I'm not sure I understand thatI suppose it depends on what you think "women as a whole" should be.
To form an opinion that genuinely chosen sex work is damaging to "women as a whole" one would first need to have an opinion on what "women as a whole" should be like, surely?I'm not sure I understand that
Ah I see. I guess the argument is that women as whole shouldn't be viewed primarily as sex objects whose own enjoyment of sex is secondary to a man's, who shouldn't be bought and used, and whose purpose isn't to serve men.To form an opinion that genuinely chosen sex work is damaging to "women as a whole" one would first need to have an opinion on what "women as a whole" should be like, surely?
I can see where that argument comes from, but I imagine that genuine sex workers consider their bodies to be their own, to do with as they please. And that the act of selling sex doesn't make them a sex object, because it's one act/series of acts rather than an expression of who they are as a person (for instance, I do not view my work as me in my entirety).Ah I see. I guess the argument is that women as whole shouldn't be viewed primarily as sex objects whose own enjoyment of sex is secondary to a man's, who shouldn't be bought and used, and whose purpose isn't to serve men.
Hell with you, the sins of Dwyer are not the sins of academia.
I'll just make a LLETSA-style interruption here to say that a lot of people in the modern world don't have real control over their bodies, and this kind of "genuine" autonomy is always subject to a tight web of social pressures and economic demands.I can see where that argument comes from, but I imagine that genuine sex workers consider their bodies to be their own, to do with as they please.
Yes, you can argue that a woman should be free to do whatever they want with their body, but that does not mean that it isn't damaging (to herself or others). Feminism doesn't mean doing whatever you want with no consideration of the impact on others, does it?I can see where that argument comes from, but I imagine that genuine sex workers consider their bodies to be their own, to do with as they please. And that the act of selling sex doesn't make them a sex object, because it's one act/series of acts rather than an expression of who they are as a person (for instance, I do not view my work as me in my entirety).
It's also a short leap from that argument against autonomy to others of a similar nature eg pro-life.
Ah I see. I guess the argument is that women as whole shouldn't be viewed primarily as sex objects whose own enjoyment of sex is secondary to a man's, who shouldn't be bought and used, and whose purpose isn't to serve men.
Agreed. However, why should sex work be any worse than other work?I'll just make a LLETSA-style interruption here to say that a lot of people in the modern world don't have real control over their bodies, and this kind of "genuine" autonomy is always subject to a tight web of social pressures and economic demands.
Is sex work the same as any other work?Agreed. However, why should sex work be any worse than other work?
Same as the pro-life argument when it comes down to it. The needs of the unborn, the rights of the father etc.Yes, you can argue that a woman should be free to do whatever they want with their body, but that does not mean that it isn't damaging (to herself or others). Feminism doesn't mean doing whatever you want with no consideration of the impact on others, does it?
Capitalism has made a huge industry of it. But I would sooner blame Capitalism than the individuals who make their choices within it.Is sex work the same as any other work?
I don't see the link, unless you are saying abortion damages women?Same as the pro-life argument when it comes down to it. The needs of the unborn, the rights of the father etc.
How does a sex worker that services housebound disabled men, harm women? (For the sake of example).I think what I am trying to say with the choice thing is, an individual woman can make any decision she wants but just because it is a woman making it doesn't make it a feminist choice. If your choices are harming other women then they are not feminist actions (even if they are autonomous decisions). I think sex work is damaging, both to many/most of the women involved and to society, so if a person is making a true choice to be involved in it then that is something that could be criticised.
Are all individuals blameless, whatever they do within capitalism?Capitalism has made a huge industry of it. But I would sooner blame Capitalism than the individuals who make their choices within it.
Fuck knows what some of these men would feel like if presented with some proper radfem politics
Edit: talking of which, this caused a shitstorm this year: http://gendertrender.wordpress.com/2012/05/18/radfem-2012-first-speakers-announced/
I think what I am trying to say with the choice thing is, an individual woman can make any decision she wants but just because it is a woman making it doesn't make it a feminist choice. If your choices are harming other women then they are not feminist actions (even if they are autonomous decisions). I think sex work is damaging, both to many/most of the women involved and to society, so if a person is making a true choice to be involved in it then that is something that could be criticised.
Have a look at that link I provided for an insight. There's some very unpleasant stuff at the heart of what's emerging (in my view).
Abortion can be damaging to women, both physically and emotionally. But not always. And in any event, I believe that it's the woman's right to choose. Sex work can also be damaging to women. But not always. And if a woman decides that's what she wants to do, it's as much her right to choose that as any other potentially damaging job.I don't see the link, unless you are saying abortion damages women?
Doesn't it get a bit arbitrary if you start trying to find lines between good and bad sex work? I am leaning towards any form of buying or selling women for sex being damaging to women in this society.How does a sex worker that services housebound disabled men, harm women? (For the sake of example).
I see no reason not to extend the same arguments against Capitalism to sex work. I don't see why it should be viewed as special, or an exception.Are all individuals blameless, whatever they do within capitalism?
I wouldn't blame, say, individual factory workers making missile parts, but I would criticise someone who has lots of opportunities available to them but chooses to work in the arms trade for example.
It's as arbitrary as finding lines between any kind of acceptable work, for men or women.Doesn't it get a bit arbitrary if you start trying to find lines between good and bad sex work? I am leaning towards any form of buying or selling women for sex being damaging to women in this society.
I do think it is exceptional. There is a difference between, for example, having sex with someone and cutting their hair. Certainly most people in this society do view sex as somewhat different to other everyday activities.I see no reason not to extend the same arguments against Capitalism to sex work. I don't see why it should be viewed as special, or an exception.
Incidentally, sex workers aren't confined to having sex. Is it just the actual act of sex that's the problem for you? How about chat lines?I do think it is exceptional. There is a difference between, for example, having sex with someone and cutting their hair. Certainly most people in this society do view sex as somewhat different to other everyday activities.
They don't accept trans women?! How far up their own arses are these clowns? They're so fucking radical there must be about 5 of them!