Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Another spoiled little man goes a US gun rampage (six people murdered in Santa Barbara)

Here's a map of events as it happened:

BodDJwmIEAEIPfJ.png:large
 
the evil villain chuckle he has in the video is, well, weird.
of course he is, indeed, a dicksplash. I wonder, tho, whether he and the other shooters are a symptom of something else which is even more sick. i don't mean just the gun laws in the US, but something in the society itself. I mean, the kind of hedonism where everybody is supposed to be happy and at it all the time etc. ,and feeling like a failure. like pharell william's happy, but all the time, and you're just not feeling it. then again, on the other hand, with all the cash he has, why didn't just go to the red light and see a pro? he is a dickshite.
 
If people insist on this cunt with free will vs nutter framework for thinking about this, the argument will just go round and round as it always does.

I don't understand why Johnny Canuck3 's point isn't clear. It seems to me that he's saying that whether or not you can say that someone is mentally ill in the sense that they would receive a medical diagnosis from a psychiatrist (just one way of viewing and categorising the experience of emotional and psychological distress), we are all the sum of our experiences, and none of us have free will. He's saying, I think, that if you're not going to consider this man's emotional disturbance as just that and instead call him just a cunt then you may aswell as be saying some people are born bad or evil.
 
the evil villain chuckle he has in the video is, well, weird.
of course he is, indeed, a dicksplash. I wonder, tho, whether he and the other shooters are a symptom of something else which is even more sick. i don't mean just the gun laws in the US, but something in the society itself. I mean, the kind of hedonism where everybody is supposed to be happy and at it all the time etc. ,and feeling like a failure. like pharell william's happy, but all the time, and you're just not feeling it. then again, on the other hand, with all the cash he has, why didn't just go to the red light and see a pro? he is a dickshite.

Isn't the point that most of us can feel happy or find something to be happy about despite all the other shit going on in the world and the shortcomings of our own lives?


IME it is far more common to turn self-pity/loathing and anger in on oneself than to externalise it.

This person did have a lot going for him, in terms of his situation and opportunities. His focus and priorities though were to destroy the things he couldn't have or control.

I am still taken by the fact he could'nt see that he wasn't alone and shared similar experiences with others. That despite his unhappiness, there were still things worth be happy about and that there is hope. That speaks volumes to me about this case. He wanted it all or nothing. Also yes, there are hedonistic, priviledged and mysogonistic elements to his narrative.
 
Last edited:
If people insist on this cunt with free will vs nutter framework for thinking about this, the argument will just go round and round as it always does.

I don't understand why Johnny Canuck3 's point isn't clear. It seems to me that he's saying that whether or not you can say that someone is mentally ill in the sense that they would receive a medical diagnosis from a psychiatrist (just one way of viewing and categorising the experience of emotional and psychological distress), we are all the sum of our experiences, and none of us have free will. He's saying, I think, that if you're not going to consider this man's emotional disturbance as just that and instead call him just a cunt then you may aswell as be saying some people are born bad or evil.
No, he's saying misogyny isn't an important element in this. I know this because EVERY SINGLE THREAD about misogyny has him trying to make out it's not the main issue or that it shouldn't be taken seriously.
 
No, he's saying misogyny isn't an important element in this. I know this because EVERY SINGLE THREAD about misogyny has him trying to make out it's not the main issue or that it shouldn't be taken seriously.

Was he? That hasn't been my impression, but I'm aware that other people are of that opinion, I'll read his posts again. I'm pretty alert to misogyny and I don't think that misogyny is the main issue either, I think that was a peg to hang his hatred on. In any case, he hated the world, not just women.

He has still argued what I post above and been seen to argue the opposite, which is what I was actually referring to.
 
I don't think they're necessarily the same thing. A sadistic cunt might be that way because of psychological compulsion etc. Evil is doing it out of free choice. Not having to do it; knowing it is wrong and simply wanting to do it.

Personally, I don't believe in evil; but then again, I don't believe in free will.
I don't believe in free will either. but free will and agency aren't the same thing - the choices we have are limited and not just by physical constraints but we do have a choice. you seem to want to get bogged down in semantics. I'm not sure that's helpful. evil, bad, cunt, whatever - his neorological makeup and the psychological impact of his life experiences of course played a role, and a very significant one, but he still could have chosen not to do it, as many people with similar conditions and similar life experiences manage to do.
 
[/SPOILER]
I don't believe in free will either. but free will and agency aren't the same thing - the choices we have are limited and not just by physical constraints but we do have a choice. you seem to want to get bogged down in semantics. I'm not sure that's helpful. evil, bad, cunt, whatever - his neorological makeup and the psychological impact of his life experiences of course played a role, and a very significant one, but he still could have chosen not to do it, as many people with similar conditions and similar life experiences manage to do.

Simliar, but not the same. Its all in the details..

Dont ask me why, but some goulish instinct made me look up maddy humpreys from hidden hill and i was so surprised when i got a hit!
 
Last edited:
I made a post earlier in the thread which may have come across as flippant, suggesting that he had PD etc. It looks like I'm pathologising the person as a way of explaining his views and actions. Just to be clear, that's a bollocks line of thinking and isn't particularly helpful at this time, particularly when his victims lie dead.

Baseless speculation on my part, apologies.

Any cognitive or developmental issues this man faced still needs to be considered alongside the misogyny of his expressed views and his horrific actions. No amount of "explaining away" is ever sufficient, especially now this is being played out in the media.

I particularly regret my crass reference to Phil Collins, too.
 
Asd is commonly misdiagnosed and more so in the US than here.

Spot on. Even when 'diagnosed' the proper assessments have often not been carried out ime, just someone went on a course while Aspergers was a hot topic, then met a kid who was 'a bit odd' and the snowball rolled from there.

Just skimmed the first 40 pages of the manifesto and he seems to have a comparitively 'normal' childhood. (Although it could be considered a DM wankfest of parental separation and computer games).

Is Aspergers more commonly diagnosed in teenagers?
 
Any cognitive or developmental issues this man faced still needs to be considered alongside the misogyny of his expressed views and his horrific actions. No amount of "explaining away" is ever sufficient, especially now this is being played out in the media.

No one has done any explaining away ffs! Who has done that here?
 
I don't believe in free will either. but free will and agency aren't the same thing - the choices we have are limited and not just by physical constraints but we do have a choice. .

Not sure that those two are compatible: not believing in free will, but thinking that we do have a choice?
 
[/SPOILER]

Simliar, but not the same. Its all in the details..

Dont ask me why, but some goulish instinct made me look up maddy humpreys from hidden hill and i was so surprised when i got a hit!
of course not the same. no two people have exactly the same experiences and neurology. but you appear to be implying that We're all bound to act in a particular way as a result of biological and experiential factors. I completely reject that. he had a choice. his experiences/makeup may have made him less likely to make the right one but he could have acted otherwise. that he didn't makes him a cunt.
 
Back
Top Bottom