A "bad seed" suggests that someone has a congenital predisposition to be a wrong-doer. Literally bad semen.Someone else suggested that some people are 'just cunts'.
Doesn't seem so different from 'bad seed'.
A "bad seed" suggests that someone has a congenital predisposition to be a wrong-doer. Literally bad semen.Someone else suggested that some people are 'just cunts'.
Doesn't seem so different from 'bad seed'.
A "bad seed" suggests that someone has a congenital predisposition to be a wrong-doer. Literally bad semen.
A book that is about the concept of nature vs nurture, so pretty much has a lot to do with semen (in the sense of seed), and thus the book's title.To me it suggests a novel written by William March, and has nothing to do with semen.
and a knife seeing as he stabbed his first 3 victims to death, lets ban them aswell eh!Easy access to a gun?
Yeah definitely comes across psychotic. Watch any of his videos it's all about 'boo hoo girls don't like me' mixed with cartoon like villainy but with a sinister undercurrent.
I'm not going to watch that, but let me guess: he's pretty upset?
Trust the media to deliver the news.
Would have rather had him stand trial in public for the 6 murders.Got about 3 minutes in to that video and had to turn it off. Glad he's dead.
the evil villain chuckle he has in the video is, well, weird.
of course he is, indeed, a dicksplash. I wonder, tho, whether he and the other shooters are a symptom of something else which is even more sick. i don't mean just the gun laws in the US, but something in the society itself. I mean, the kind of hedonism where everybody is supposed to be happy and at it all the time etc. ,and feeling like a failure. like pharell william's happy, but all the time, and you're just not feeling it. then again, on the other hand, with all the cash he has, why didn't just go to the red light and see a pro? he is a dickshite.
No, he's saying misogyny isn't an important element in this. I know this because EVERY SINGLE THREAD about misogyny has him trying to make out it's not the main issue or that it shouldn't be taken seriously.If people insist on this cunt with free will vs nutter framework for thinking about this, the argument will just go round and round as it always does.
I don't understand why Johnny Canuck3 's point isn't clear. It seems to me that he's saying that whether or not you can say that someone is mentally ill in the sense that they would receive a medical diagnosis from a psychiatrist (just one way of viewing and categorising the experience of emotional and psychological distress), we are all the sum of our experiences, and none of us have free will. He's saying, I think, that if you're not going to consider this man's emotional disturbance as just that and instead call him just a cunt then you may aswell as be saying some people are born bad or evil.
No, he's saying misogyny isn't an important element in this. I know this because EVERY SINGLE THREAD about misogyny has him trying to make out it's not the main issue or that it shouldn't be taken seriously.
I don't believe in free will either. but free will and agency aren't the same thing - the choices we have are limited and not just by physical constraints but we do have a choice. you seem to want to get bogged down in semantics. I'm not sure that's helpful. evil, bad, cunt, whatever - his neorological makeup and the psychological impact of his life experiences of course played a role, and a very significant one, but he still could have chosen not to do it, as many people with similar conditions and similar life experiences manage to do.I don't think they're necessarily the same thing. A sadistic cunt might be that way because of psychological compulsion etc. Evil is doing it out of free choice. Not having to do it; knowing it is wrong and simply wanting to do it.
Personally, I don't believe in evil; but then again, I don't believe in free will.
Same here. I doubt it was an option though.Would have rather had him stand trial in public for the 6 murders.
I don't believe in free will either. but free will and agency aren't the same thing - the choices we have are limited and not just by physical constraints but we do have a choice. you seem to want to get bogged down in semantics. I'm not sure that's helpful. evil, bad, cunt, whatever - his neorological makeup and the psychological impact of his life experiences of course played a role, and a very significant one, but he still could have chosen not to do it, as many people with similar conditions and similar life experiences manage to do.
Simliar, but not the same. Its all in the details..
Asd is commonly misdiagnosed and more so in the US than here.
Any cognitive or developmental issues this man faced still needs to be considered alongside the misogyny of his expressed views and his horrific actions. No amount of "explaining away" is ever sufficient, especially now this is being played out in the media.
No one has done any explaining away ffs! Who has done that here?
snip..
Is Aspergers more commonly diagnosed in teenagers?
I don't believe in free will either. but free will and agency aren't the same thing - the choices we have are limited and not just by physical constraints but we do have a choice. .
of course not the same. no two people have exactly the same experiences and neurology. but you appear to be implying that We're all bound to act in a particular way as a result of biological and experiential factors. I completely reject that. he had a choice. his experiences/makeup may have made him less likely to make the right one but he could have acted otherwise. that he didn't makes him a cunt.[/SPOILER]
Simliar, but not the same. Its all in the details..
Dont ask me why, but some goulish instinct made me look up maddy humpreys from hidden hill and i was so surprised when i got a hit!
No one has done any explaining away ffs! Who has done that here?
he had a choice. .