Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
I think he might surprise youAnd you can arrange this?
I think he might surprise youAnd you can arrange this?
Well bollocks to that.
Democracy and reformism is part of the problem, always has been - always will be.
Democracy and reformism mean a continuation of the status quo - capitalism, the state, parliamentary parasites, the wage system, the class sytem - all things that need to go.
Revolutionary anarchism is what is required.
Very aware I might well be on my own here, but, I saw this image and thought...
View attachment 284474
I suspect more people would be after the accessories than the garbDon't show it to the editors at Vogue magazine. They've already given us "Heroin Chic" and "Nazi Chic". I think we can do without "Taliban Chic."
I suspect more people would be after the accessories than the garb
When in power the Taliban banned the opium trade, but after the invasion they decided to participate in it, claiming that it was a means to an end to fight the invaders. But I don't think it's true that the Taliban had anywhere near a monopoly on the opium trade, plenty of government aligned individuals and others were also making shitloads of money from opium/heroin, and it seems like that especially out in the provinces, a lot of the fighting between coalition/government forces and the Taliban, was in reality more about conflicts between rival drug traffickers.I just came across a video by Roberto Saviano claiming that heroin production is supported and taxed by the Taliban and the resources that this gives them is what has enabled them to succeed in occupying the country so rapidly, which would seem to contradict what that, sadly paywalled, NYT claims. Equally unhelpfully, for most, it is in Italian.
I’m not wading into anyone. I’m questioning the politics of an approach that responds to a post about the Taliban killing people by questioning if calling them medieval is fair/western imperialist.
I’m also questioning the conflation of them and the Mujahideen.
And you can arrange this?
Great photos as usual, Gramsci.
Just watched the video. He basically just says the defining characteristic of the Taliban is that they are narcotraffickers, that they always have been, and that their returns from the sale of heroin were greater than what the US invested in the ANA, thus potentially a richer army (not sure about that tbh). He also says that Iran will be enemy of the new Taliban regime because they are particularly afflicted by a heroin epidemic they'd like to stop and which they see the Taliban as responsible for. He says 90% of the world's heroin comes via the Taliban and that even legal opiates we find in hospitals often come from Afghan heroin at the source, but are sort of laundered through different countries before being sold to Western pharma companies.
Not sure how trustworthy he is on much of this stuff, not many sources given, but he certainly is the most respected intellectual voice on the drug trade within Italy.
this would be the panshir valley which isn't under the control of the taliban?I don't have a good source to cite right now but I have got the impression the Talibans success has been to gain the supoort of the rural poor by providing governance between villages and tribes who are largely growing poppies and living under the yoke of warlords in the Panshir valley that produce and ship the heroin. Might be a simplistic I admit but they must be providing some form of governance out in the fields of poppy's
sometimes?Sometimes I find the way politics is discussed here is about point scoring or hammering any poster who isn't up to it in Urban terms.
I tend to think of bourgeois democracy when I see or hear the term these days.Like I say, I mean democracy in a very broad sense of the term, which includes anarcho-syndalicism.
Child refugees from Afghanistan are being held by the Home Office in hotels for weeks on end without shoes, spare clothes, money or access to healthcare, embarrassing the home secretary, who promised to help people fleeing the Taliban.
However, I think it's naive of this article to suggest this has embarrassed the Home Secretary. She is utterly shameless.Afghan child refugees left without support in Home Office hotels
Charities accuse the government of failing to meet young asylum seekers’ basic needs, despite care pledgewww.theguardian.com
As Badgers would say
#ToryScum
she accounts it a wasted day if she hasn't made more children go to bed hungryHowever, I think it's naive of this article to suggest this has embarrassed the Home Secretary. She is utterly shameless.
Clearly notBritain can't stand up to the Taliban? I mean on its own. An insurgence. The painstaking work, the hearts and minds, network building, doesn't count for shit?
ain can't stand up to the Taliban? I mean on its own. An insurgence. The painstaking work, the hearts and minds, network building, doesn't count for shit?
SatireBritain can't stand up to the Taliban? I mean on its own. An insurgence. The painstaking work, the hearts and minds, network building, doesn't count for shit?
Based on my front garden's crop this year there isn't really any good reason for an opium shortage in the UK. Looks like the Home Office are being arses to stop UK exports - Subscribe to read | Financial TimesYour mate is mostly spot on. It's not that 90% of the world's heroin comes from the taliban, but yes from Afghanistan. But they didn't control it all up to now. And now of course, they will control a hell of a lot more.
I highly doubt the hospital heroin claim though. There has been an ongoing shortage of diamorphine in the NHS for 20 years. English farmers have been recruited in the past to help out. But it is never enough. So there's a business opportunity for the taliban.
I think the 'plan' was to hand over an oveneady AfganistanThey knew the withdrawal was coming. If the 'plan' involved hoping and praying they could get them out then it is a pisstake.
More drivel from someone else I once had some time and respect for. This insistence that you can’t criticise the liberal democracy worldview of the third way neo-libs without letting Biden off the hook is exhausting: