littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Because she believes he's innocent?He's a convicted rapist, why is she standing by him?
.
Because she believes he's innocent?He's a convicted rapist, why is she standing by him?
.
Well, presumably, possibly. But even if his appeal succeeds, the question remains as to why she stood by him - given the way he behaved. Even without a rape conviction he's an utter sleazebag.Because she believes he's innocent?
After having heard and seen even the publicly available evidence to believe there's anything worth defending here is pretty fucking appalling. I expect we're on the road to yet another of your don't moralise posts though.Because she believes he's innocent?
I suspect it's because she doesn't understand what rape is any more than he doesBecause she believes he's innocent?
it does seem to be a reccuring theme that being twatted beyond belief is grounds for consent. I wonder how many blokes waking up after a night out with a very sore ringpiece and an aching jaw would take the view that 'oh dear I walked into it and I should know what men are like'.I suspect it's because she doesn't understand what rape is any more than he does
Yes, it's the lie that 'being taken advantage of' is somehow just one of those things - and puts the onus on the person who is paralytic rather than the one who should have been seeking consent.it does seem to be a reccuring theme that being twatted beyond belief is grounds for consent. I wonder how many blokes waking up after a night out with a very sore ringpiece and an aching jaw would take the view that 'oh dear I walked into it and I should know what men are like'.
it does seem to be a reccuring theme that being twatted beyond belief is grounds for consent. I wonder how many blokes waking up after a night out with a very sore ringpiece and an aching jaw would take the view that 'oh dear I walked into it and I should know what men are like'.
Yes, my pure guess is that the 'investigative journalist' they hired might have been the point of contact with the Mirror. Also, might be wrong without going back to the stories, but they were written with regard to what was in the dossier sent to the CCRC (rather than what the CCRC have said/leaked).Reading the stories in both the Mail and the Mirror, it appears that their main source for most of the information is someone from the Evans camp, so I would be very wary about accepting at face value anything there about exactly why the CCRC has made the decision it has. All we really know is that they've made the decision to let an appeal go ahead; the reasons will hopefully become clearer as the appeal progresses.
Those stories should be read on the basis that they are basically more PR and spin from the Evans camp (which the papers have chosen to print knowing full well that's what they are) rather than anything approaching a neutral reporting of the actual facts.
With the usual apologies for the source, the details of evan's appeal emerge. Use of private investigators, focus on the woman's 'lifestyle', already leaking details that she had been banned from a bar.... but then claiming it wasn't 'character assassination'. Fucking scum.
Case drawn up to clear Ched Evans set to question victim's lifestyle
So...you can not convict someone based on how horrible you find their character as you have to consider the evidence but you can possibly reverse a rape conviction purely based on the the victims (alleged) previous sexual behaviour ?
Am honestly lost for words at the blatant attitude of "it weren't proper rape" that is on display in this case.
The hypocrisy is endless
yeah that is very dodgy territory, I hope it is more than just pointing out that she'd had a lot of one night stands, it would be ridiculous if that was sufficient to reverse his conviction
there is that witness mentioned above who had 'a 'significant' conversation with the victim' - though it doesn't seem to be clear if that is a witness the police spoke to and chose to ignore at the time and the private detectives have now found out about or if that is a brand new witness who has only come forwards after some private detectives started asking around
Fuck knows how the FiL rationalises it all to himself. There isn't really a logical explanation beyond going along with his daughter's wishes.
Well, presumably, possibly. But even if his appeal succeeds, the question remains as to why she stood by him - given the way he behaved. Even without a rape conviction he's an utter sleazebag.
it does seem to be a reccuring theme that being twatted beyond belief is grounds for consent. I wonder how many blokes waking up after a night out with a very sore ringpiece and an aching jaw would take the view that 'oh dear I walked into it and I should know what men are like'.
. Clearly this night was not a one off either.
There's belief, and then there's deliberate self-delusion. Given the evidence arrayed against Evans, I suspect the latter.Because she believes he's innocent?
Because she believes he's innocent?
There's a middle way, which I think is much more likely - unconscious self-delusion.There's belief, and then there's deliberate self-delusion. Given the evidence arrayed against Evans, I suspect the latter.
I'd agree with this wholeheartedly. They've definitely done this before, it's chilling to think of what they might have got away with previously be ause the entire predatory attitude behind it just stinks. And they'd have had loads of opportunities for that kind of behaviour given their celeb status . I doubt very much Evans was just turning up there on the off chance he might get a shag from a complete stranger who was already engaged in activity with his mate. He was only there a very short while and went straight at it. He was sure he was getting one, which indicates to me consent, or lack of it,just wasn't part of the equation beforehand. that's a seriously bad mindset.
I've got to say I honestly don't give a fuck if this woman lied or not in this case...not from her perspective, i most certainly do care if someone wasraped...but purely from his. It's like with that other predator Strauss Kahn. I actually believe he was set up ...that time. But that he'd done it before on a number of occasions and gotten away with it. So worlds smallest violin.
Except that now they do want to make it all about her. This is the sort of case that should be a major turning point in the way we deal with sexual attitudes (and not just towards women - ANY form of sexual assault needs to be seen as serious and Just Not On). Sadly, I suspect that we still have some way to go.IMO, i reckon one of the reasons this case resulted in conviction was that it wasn't based on the woman's testimony. much harder to make a defence case about lying golddiggers/vindictive or regretful 'sluts' when the victim's testimony can be summed up as 'i dont remember'. says a lot about how women's testimony is viewed when it's probably been helpful to the case that there wasn't any.
Today we can reveal details of the new evidence which footballer Ched Evans thinks will help clear his name when his conviction for rape is referred back to the court of appeal.
A case file drawn up by private investigators includes testimony from at least 14 women and men who knew his victim....
The dossier – which will be put to Appeal Court judges – also criticises the police investigation and an alleged failure to secure potentially crucial CCTV footage.
And the investigators, hired by the wealthy father of Evans’ pregnant fiancée Natasha Massey, even attack the summing up made by the trial judge, alleging he misled the jury...
Except that now they do want to make it all about her. This is the sort of case that should be a major turning point in the way we deal with sexual attitudes (and not just towards women - ANY form of sexual assault needs to be seen as serious and Just Not On). Sadly, I suspect that we still have some way to go.
So, in a much more non-constructive sense, I hope that Evans reaps the full extent of the Streisand Effect in return for putting himself in the public spotlight again as he attempts to besmirch his victim in order to clear himself.
And I sincerely hope that the football industry is savvy enough to make sure that they are not seen to be supporting, in any way, an unrepentant convicted rapist.
he's not deliberately evil
he's an idiot and genuinely believes he hasn't raped anyone which is very sad and rather scary
he's not deliberately evil
he's an idiot and genuinely believes he hasn't raped anyone which is very sad and rather scary
we (not me and you, the wider we) have had discussions on here about where feminism intersects (lol) with class politics and in this- and in other cases, like that IMF bloke who deffo never raped that woman right. There is a parralel in the way the woman was seen as a tool to be used. And the outraged reaction to being called on such behaviour. Its almost like theres a system or something...I'd say shagging a drunk and incapable woman on the consent of your mate whilst getting other mates to film the encounter goes beyond being a bit of a cunt tbh. I never find the word 'evil' particularly helpful but fucking hell. It's a dark way to treat someone.
Yeah, like there's institutional sexism or something. That can't be right...wait....we (not me and you, the wider we) have had discussions on here about where feminism intersects (lol) with class politics and in this- and in other cases, like that IMF bloke who deffo never raped that woman right. There is a parralel in the way the woman was seen as a tool to be used. And the outraged reaction to being called on such behaviour. Its almost like theres a system or something...