So presumably you can't back up your insinuation that pushbikes doing 15mph represent a comparable risk to cars doing 30mph? And that's why you're now falling back on your old trick of putting imaginary nonsense in other posters' mouths in the hopes nobody will notice the torrent of shit spouting from your own.
Where have I said that? Who's the one putting imaginary nonsense in other people's mouths?
My mention of the 15 mph speed was simply to illustrate that if people have been killed- however infrequently- by collision with a cyclist at that speed, it is absurd to pretend that being hit at
25 mph by an e-bike is not likely to result in, at very least, serious injuries, as well as the odd death. Is the emphasis to reduce deaths and serious injuries to zero, or is there a degree of tolerable serious injuries and deaths we are more than happy to tolerate if the offender is travelling on a bicycle?
It is quite telling to do a search in this forum about electric scooters and pavements. To my great surprise it turns out that you, Frank (and a fair few others of course), are completely against (15 mph) electric scooters being ridden on pavements, because
apparently they are a danger to pedestrians. I haven't bothered quoting your comments in question, but by all means, please let me know if you would like me to.
So a 15mph scooter colliding with a pedestrian = dangerous and unacceptable. But a 25mph bike colliding with a pedestrian = a perfectly acceptable degree of very low risk apparently, so there's no reason why speed limits should apply to cyclists in 20 mph zones
The double standards of some pedestrian safety champions around here whenever bicycles come into the equation are nothing short of legendary.