Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Hmm. You've missed your tack here spy
Great minds Herr Model
Hmm. You've missed your tack here spy
All the racists who voted for Leave won it for Leavers.And the non-racists who voted to leave fucked it for the remainers.
This is a stunning piece of analysis you’ve got going on here.
All the racists who voted for Leave won it for Leavers.
They were hardly going to vote for anything else were they?
How did the cyclist vote breakdown?I reckon it was the bricklayers.
If every bricklayer who voted to leave had voted to remain, things would be different now, I can tell ya!
How did the cyclist vote breakdown?
Once they've "acknowledged" this, then what?Non-racists were of course free to vote for Brexit too. But they ought to have sufficient integrity and honesty to ackowledge that they needed the backing of the racists too, without whom they would have lost.
Over 1/4 million people - from all over the world and in the middle of a pandemic - came in the UK last year. The idea that only exploited labour from the EU could be attracted here is another remain fantasy that has no substance in fact
Straw man time again is it?
I never said that as you of course know. Non racists as well as racists voted for Brexit. But there were not enough of the former to win it on their own. The racist vote made the difference.
Perhaps i should have worded it 'the vast majority of the populace who could be considered racists were hardly going to vote any other way'. But as for Cameron and May - the latter was certainly responsible for the roving billboard ads and the 'hostile environment' does that make her racist? Possibly and yet she would almost certainly have voted remain. As for Cameron tbh i have no certain idea off the top of my head but of one thing I am certain is that politicians will very often pursue policies and do or say things that are calculated to curry favour with their current perception of the public mood.What way did Cameron and May vote?
ah so leave the EU has no stop the exploration of foreign cheap labour
so leaving the EU was a complete and utter waste of time
kick in the ballocks for the party at campaigned for the leave vote for 30 years
and even with a fuck wit like boris johnson in the top job will likely been in power for the next 10 years
with we gave you brexit being brought up in every election till we all die
soild win for the working man
the leader ship at the time of the conservative party campaigned to remain
not the whole party
Assuming you still think this opportunity really existed, who was it that was supposed to take advantage of it and why have they failed?For those involved in pro working class politics, a second motivator for the vote was the opportunity to break with neo-liberal economic orthodoxy
Whatever,You claimed that both UK and 26 cos in EU diluted division -> gfa. But without the people I mentioned no gfa. No reduction in division, insofar as there has been such a reduction tho the way the uup have been relegated and the dup become the largest unionist party doesn't to me suggest a reduction in division.
Yeh I didn't think you'd back up your dissolving division bitWhatever,
The land border in Ireland has become more of a problem than it was because of the vote to leave.
Whatever,
The land border in Ireland has become more of a problem than it was because of the vote to leave.
I don’t have to because I wrote diluting division.Yeh I didn't think you'd back up your dissolving division bit
What way did Cameron and May vote?
As for Cameron tbh i have no certain idea off the top of my head but of one thing I am certain is that politicians will very often pursue policies and do or say things that are calculated to curry favour with their current perception of the public mood.
Slow start but exciting work is occurring at the Office of Brexit Opportunities and Government Efficiencies .... Any moment now...Ten thousand five hundred and eighty two posts are we nearly there yet.
Strangely you said nothing to support your bit about diluting division in your response to this post:I don’t have to because I wrote diluting division.
If you want to show off then get your facts right.
I'm asking you now to substantiate your diluting division claim. If you don't have to back stuff up when someone puts the wrong word in their post I suppose you have to , by your own code of honour, when they ask you directly using the words you didYou claimed that both UK and 26 cos in EU diluted division -> gfa. But without the people I mentioned no gfa. No reduction in division, insofar as there has been such a reduction tho the way the uup have been relegated and the dup become the largest unionist party doesn't to me suggest a reduction in division.
Yes but what's your actual evidence for division being diluted on anything more than a bureaucratic level?Both the ROI and the UK being in the same system, following the same rules by the introduction of the single market in 1993, made it easier in some areas of life on the island for people to get along better because it got rid of any customs controls. Hence some reasons for folk on the island to complain they are divided were lessened, hence diluted.
The single market was an EU thing.
When do you think customs controls between the north and the south were fully abolished, and did the EU have anything to do with that?