What "NO to AV, YES to PR" campaign was that then?
This was a 'No to AV, YES to FPTP' campaign.... Yes to FPTP for bloody generations to come.
no it wasn't
Anyone thinking that a vote for FPTP somehow puts us a step nearer to PR is living in cloud cuckoo land.
Anyone thinking that a vote for FPTP somehow puts us a step nearer to PR is living in cloud cuckoo land.
i remember watching one of the debates on the parliament channel and it was the tories wanting a 50% voter turnout threshold for any yes vote to be valid, they didnt get it in the end so it would be quite bizarre for the yes to av to now make the same argument. although having said that they are lib dems so who knows^^^^What are the odds that these figures will be spun by Yes to AV that not enough people voted, so morally the (more than likely No) result doesn't count? "There wasn't a 50% voter threshold" etc.
What "NO to AV, YES to PR" campaign was that then?
This was a 'No to AV, YES to FPTP' campaign.... Yes to FPTP for bloody generations to come.
Anyone thinking that a vote for FPTP somehow puts us a step nearer to PR is living in cloud cuckoo land.
What "NO to AV, YES to PR" campaign was that then?
This was a 'No to AV, YES to FPTP' campaign.... Yes to FPTP for bloody generations to come.
Hopes of replacing the first-past-the-post voting system with the alternative vote (AV) have received a blow as Lord Owen, one of the founders of the Social Democratic party that went on to form the Liberal Democrats with the Liberal party, helped found a group opposed to AV in favour of "real reform".
The "No to AV, Yes to PR" campaign was formally announced on Friday in the Guardian's letters page, with the support of Owen, his fellow crossbench peer Lord Skidelsky, and other eminent figures including the Bishop of Blackburn, Nicholas Reade.
It is designed to attract those disaffected by the decision of the longstanding supporters of proportional representation – such as the Liberal Democrats, Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust and the Electoral Reform Society – to back the Yes to AV campaign.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/mar/11/av-lord-owen-opposed-pr
I think i've asked you this before with no reply. Who is arguing that? I've not seen anyone argue that.
Looks like it's going to be 70% for the No vote, thus sending Clegg's pointless pet project into fucking oblivion.
Why are you so uninterested in the actual experience of AV elsewhere? I've given you an entire academic paper to peruse, and you're still coming here with uninformed bullshit based on propaganda materials and no actual evidence.
And yet it's neck & neck on urban, interesting.
Fuck you ymu. I think for myself, thankyou. Citing the one and only seat a national small party has ever won – barring perhaps Galloway and Respect – as some kind of evidence of the goodness of the current system? Maybe you should have a look at the crap you're posting before accusing others of swallowing propaganda.
lambeth returns a yes vote for AV! explains the result of this poll.
You're being a prick, you know that. Don't read things into my posts that aren't there, please. And show me some evidence that AV squeezes smaller parties more effectively than the current version of fptp.Never had you down for an anti-empiricist. There's heaps of evidence on AV out there, and you're only interested in defending your original gullibility?
I posted it ages ago. Several times, with an academic paper reviewing the evidence on precisely the argument we're having.You're being a prick, you know that. Don't read things into my posts that aren't there, please. And show me some evidence that AV squeezes smaller parties more effectively than the current version of fptp.
How the fuck can you be so opinionated about something you are so fucking ignorant about? FFS! Do you think truth just flows from your brain if you just think about something for a while? No need for outside information - if you think it's true, it must be?
Ditto for Yes to AV, also, I'd say.
Only if you're a lazy cunt who won't agitate for real change to the electoral system.
I think i've asked you this before with no reply. Who is arguing that? I've not seen anyone argue that.