editor
hiraethified
I can see your grasp of reality is still proving rather tenuous.fela fan said:Oh well, a grudging win is better than nothing i suppose...
I can see your grasp of reality is still proving rather tenuous.fela fan said:Oh well, a grudging win is better than nothing i suppose...
How much 'skill' do you need to type "9/11 phone calls" into google and read the results?Jangla said:So my web searching isn't as skilled as yours.
Err, maybe because he thought she would have heard about a plane being hijacked on the news?fela fan said:Why did he feel the need to clarify to his wife which plane he was on? 'The
Now type in "9/11 calls" and "9/11 call transcripts" and see what a difference in results you get. Please don't accuse me of not bothering when a small change in the search string yields wildly different results.editor said:How much 'skill' do you need to type "9/11 phone calls" into google and read the results?
If you wish to hold an intelligent debate on a given subject, please have the courtesy to undertake the most basic of preliminary research beforehand.
But here's one for you to ponder over: if it was all an Evil Conspiracy, why would the USG trouble itself to assemble a host of Mike Yarwoods to manufacture a host of personal phone calls from the planes when it didn't have to?
Such an operation would be hugely expensive, involve hundreds of extra operatives (for bugging and background info), could backfire very very easily and would be extremely risky.
Don't be silly! That's way too obvious!Bonfirelight said:Couldn't he have just assumed people would have heard about the hijacking?
Do your own fucking research.Jangla said:Now please supply the correct link for your first phone call quote.
editor said:I suppose the fact that the wife had no doubts whatsoever that she was talking to her husband is even remotely important to you, is it?
editor said:Err, maybe because he thought she would have heard about a plane being hijacked on the news?
It seems a perfectly logical thing to say to me.
Jay Emm said:Reading waaaay too much into it.
Personal attacks continuing then? Charming.editor said:Do your own fucking research.
You've already shown how incredibly lazy/ill-informed you are with your first wildly inaccurate claim: "As far as I can find, there were only calls made from Flight 93" and I really can't be arsed to further assist someone so reluctant to do the most basic of research.
But I'm feeling generous, so here;'s a useful link for you.
How to use Google effectively
fela fan said:Can you tell me how/why i'm doing that so i can better answer you.
Jay Emm said:There were calls made from the other flights.
So, according to your utterly perverse logic, unless she's done an interview categorically stating that it was her husband that she spoke to, then you think it's reasonable to assume that she does in fact, harbour doubts about it?fela fan said:There is just no way on earth you can claim that unless you have read an interview with her just after the event. And another interview with her a long time afterwards, long enough for her to have replayed in her mind all the events.
Please provide me with a link for those interviews.
No need, thanks.Jangla said:BTW, complete your own research .
bigfish said:There is some talk of one call being made from one of the other aircraft and none from the other two as far as I can determine. But if you have any evidence for any other calls being made other than from flight 93 then it would be useful if you could present it here.
editor said:So, according to your utterly perverse logic, unless she's done an interview categorically stating that it was her husband that she spoke to, then you think it's reasonable to assume that she does in fact, harbour doubts about it?
Cloud fucking Cuckoo Land, pal.
If she had any doubts that her husband's voice had been faked, I'm sure she would have let the world know all about it a long time ago.
I too have seen that footage in various states of doctoring (missile in, missile out) and this makes me wary of them all, but there is one undeniable thing - the huge appendage is present in every version and highly visible for a number of frames.DrJazzz said:scroll down until you find the classic footage of the South Tower impact in slow motion. Even you, editor, will be in no doubt that there is appendage underneath the aircraft from which a missile is fired just before impact. This is visible in the other footage also.
Jay Emm said:What exactly equals proof for you? A news report? The last time I put up a link I was accused of spreading disinformation.
editor said:Cloud fucking Cuckoo Land, pal.
If she had any doubts that her husband's voice had been faked, I'm sure she would have let the world know all about it a long time ago.
Jay Emm said:I'm not sure deconstructing someones sentence the way you are, given the circumstances they were in and the fact neither of us know what he really knew at the time gets us any conclusive new answers.
goldenecitrone said:Why would a massive aeroplane full of fuel need to fire a missile into the building 1/3 of a second before it crashed into it? Seems like a pretty pointless thing to do. Not that the footage has been doctored or anything.
Jangla said:I won't even ask you to post the correct link again. Unfortunately this means no-one has yet posted any link to any reports (or preferrably verified transcripts) of personal calls being made from any other plane than Flight 93.