WTC attacks - the alternative thread

[Jazzz]

With that kind of budget, I would have thought they'd have no problem lobbing in a few smoke machines too, but logic doesn't appear to be DrJ's strongest suite when it comes to conspiracy theories.

I think you mean logic doesn't appear to be my 'strongest suit'. It think the reference derives from bridge, possibly whist.

Have you ever played bridge editor? It's a great game, but mentally quite challenging. To play well, you need good logic skills..

 

[editor]

Have you ever played bridge editor? It's a great game, but mentally quite challenging. To play well, you need good logic skills..

What percentage of bridge players support your bonkers theories then?

'Nuff said.

 

[fubert]

It's a great game, but mentally quite challenging. To play well, you need good logic skills..

and three friends.

 

[Jazzz]

What percentage of bridge players support your bonkers theories then?

'Nuff said.

You have indeed said quite enough in your hundreds of posts on the topic recently. This post is much more bizarre than your usual ones I have to say.

and three friends

Ah, the man who was denying making personal attacks just a moment ago.

 

[laptop]

i suppose we can add smoke machines to the list along with bombs, cyanide sprays, hologram projectors and air to surface missles.

You forgot sikrit microwave weapons in the basement.

Ones that can cook concrete while suspending the laws of physics that make steel-reinforced concrete floord a pretty good shield against... microwave radiation.

 

[fela fan]

fine

so

where did i attack dr jazz personally then ?

from #620

"the only reason i "don't have a clue" is because i can't be arsed reading half of your drivel."

Ok, maybe not a personal attack as such, but pretty impolite i thought at the time. But hey, i'm making a mountain... ignore me mate!

 

[fubert]

Ah, the man who was denying making personal attacks just a moment ago.

i was merely pointing out a requirement of bridge - never played the game myself. if you choose to take that as a personal insult that's up to you.

 

[Jazzz]

You have not made a single point worthy of discussion and you have taken the liberty of posting pictures that have already been posted once before not knowing which tower they represented. Now you insinuate insults while feigning innocence. Forgive me but I don't think you are worth further discussion with Fubert.

 

[fubert]

You have not made a single point worthy of discussion and you have taken the liberty of posting pictures that have already been posted once before not knowing which tower they represented. Now you insinuate insults while feigning innocence. Forgive me but I don't think you are worth further discussion with Fubert.

neither have you.

in fact, i did actually do one post where i pointed out a problem with the model of bomb you suggested one of the airliners hurled into a building.

you continually bang out half-baked, unsubstantiated nonsense on endless 911 threads about some huge conspiracy surrounding the attacks, are repeatedly asked to come up with facts to substantiate your claims and continually fail to provide us all with the requested credible facts from credible sources.

don't start moaning when people stop taking you seriously as you're as clearly as equally unwilling to listen to or accept the official story between behind 911 as we are to accept the ever-changing stream of conspiracy theories we're being bombarded with.