Corax
Luke 5:16
Ps - "follow people round"? I've done nothing of the sort. Get a fucking grip.I'm not dictating anything. But if you want to follow people round picking them up on casual sexism, you might as well do a thorough job of it.
Ps - "follow people round"? I've done nothing of the sort. Get a fucking grip.I'm not dictating anything. But if you want to follow people round picking them up on casual sexism, you might as well do a thorough job of it.
anyone who takes wife and kids on demos is 1/ a nob, 2/ short of members! so to speak.
havent noticed anyone criticising the overuse of cunt as an insult on here sisters!!!! LOL!!!The sexism was in the inherent assumption that the wife would be taken rather than deciding for herself.
but it's more easily seen as an insensitive slip of the tongue than the point I picked up on
but HNH, UAF attempt to undermine and discredit BNP and the EDL all the time, partly to try to stop them having legitimacy, the same haven't done this with Chaudary/Radical Islam, why couldn't they create one of their united fronts with progressive Muslims against these knobs, in the case of the SWP, they have actually collaborated with these dubious mullahs, etc, Harman while in egypt even agreed with the Cairo Statement which said Nato ships which tried to blockade Palestine would be an acceptable target.
Heavy on-line policing presence, eh.
This is an important discussion that I doubt we will see from the political classes - what is it about Britain that it produces such people?
A couple of points:
1) "Radical Islam" is somewhat more diffuse than the "ideologies" behind the BNP and the EDL, so is more difficult to pillory and/or act against on an ongoing basis.
2) The fact that radical Islamism cloaks itself in the robes of Islam-in-general means that public comment on it is more fraught with legal and social complications than comment on BritNat ideas and/or activities.
3) Radical Islamism is also able to cloak itself behind communities which, while they do not support Islamism, still respect their religio-cultural obligations to fellow Muslims.
4) Much of radical Islamism is, if not covert, still "members only" in a way that far-right activism isn't.
The interview with Abu Nusaybah on Newsnight a friend of Michael Adebolajo one of the attackers is pretty stark in outlying the process of possible radicalisation, if taken as true and reading between the lines a bit Prior to a trip to Kenya he was a bubbly person but while there he was rounded up with others (we don't know why he was there but I guess it was possible shenanigans) by the police, tortured, sexually abused and possibly raped in custody. On returning his personality changed and he complained of being harassed from the moment he returned by MI5 and asked to become an informer. Now if that was me I would crack up for one thing and assume the Kenyans were working for MI5 also.
This guy was also nicked as he walked out of the studio after the interview. My conclusion is that Abu Nusaybah is quite believable and this is a massive cock up by the security services.
Is that really true
I was thinking how lucky the people of the UK were that their government banned guns and made access to bomb making materials (such as fertilizer) very difficult.
I disagree. A friend of mine, in an attempt to convert me to the sport, took me to a cricket match a couple of weeks ago. He wasn't laying any claim of ownership upon me. Given the history of women as property the phrase becomes loaded when in the context that mal used it, but it's reasonable to see it as a common phrasing unwittingly used in an inappropriate context, IMO.Its really not.
Fuck me, that would make one hell of a bang.
That's interesting. I read elsewhere that all orders for Ammonium nitrate (and a few other chemicals that i won't list here) placed with wholesalers are, as a matter of course, passed on to a 3rd party agency's for clearance. (I assumed 3rd party agency's meant the police in the first instance).Ammonium nitrate is still the most widely-used chemical fertiliser for arable farming in use in the UK. It's not treated as an explosive, so it's merely required to be "secured" (i.e. kept in a building with a lockable door). Until the '90s, you could find sacks of it stacked in fields ahead of use on just about all non organically-farmed arable. My uncle (a house builder) keeps a couple of 26kilo sacks of it in his lock-up for stump clearance and slab-breaking.
Not to mention ball-bearings, nails and other thingsAdd about 6 or 7 gallons of diesel to your half ton of ammonium nitrate, and it'd add an even bigger bastard of a "hell of a bang".
Good but terrifying article. Seems like the establishment really has been wilfully blind to extremism in a lot of institutions.
That's interesting. I read elsewhere that all orders for Ammonium nitrate (and a few other chemicals that i won't list here) placed with wholesalers are, as a matter of course, passed on to a 3rd party agency's for clearance. (I assumed 3rd party agency's meant the police in the first instance).
Farming in the UK is quite a big industry so I guess things don't always work as they are meant too.
I assume that this kind of stuff is given some kind of chemical signature so it can be traced back to source?Yeah, it does mean police, but what it effectively means is that some overworked constable or sergeant matches orders to names on their patch along the lines of "ah, old farmer Jones has his annual order for 144 sacks in" and passing the order. It doesn't govern what happens to the stuff once it's in Jones's barn, so Jones is possibly going to find himself a couple of sacks short come time to fertilise his fields.
Yeah, it does mean police, but what it effectively means is that some overworked constable or sergeant matches orders to names on their patch along the lines of "ah, old farmer Jones has his annual order for 144 sacks in" and passing the order. It doesn't govern what happens to the stuff once it's in Jones's barn, so Jones is possibly going to find himself a couple of sacks short come time to fertilise his fields.
I assume that this kind of stuff is given some kind of chemical signature so it can be traced back to source?
Stable Horse etc. but helpful never the less
Desperatei assume we all have to post using LOL now then for those at the back. the joke is this 'anyone who takes wife and kids on demos is short of members! so to speak.' ie, they have lady willies not man willies. and i guess i shall have to cancel my act at U75 XMAS 2013!
I know this is the case in the USA, many chemicals (in batches) are given a chemical signature during manufacture and imports are also treated this way, or refused an import license. The cost incurred is paid by the US government.unlikely, in agro commerce a few big companies dominate the market . Most farmers would use the same brands .
Meant to reply to this first bit last night - pretty sure you can't call my posting style academic!
The threat to who and what? You must have some basis for deciding the edl are a bigger threat.
Not sure that you're being asked to condemn radical islam (and its telling that politics has bow becoem a matter of simply openly condemning an idea or series of ideas) but to understand what it's doing and where it comes from and by extension how to stop if being produced.
what is it about Britain that it produces such people?
Not one person or group will ever do anything like this in the UK again.
Afterwards James confessed to friends he had killed Mr Alizadah, saying he believed the boys were members of Al-Qaeda, plotting to blow up Bluewater shopping centre.