frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
The motivations are exactly the same.
I'm really not sure they are but I don't particularly want an argument, got to be up for work by 6
The motivations are exactly the same.
I'm really not sure they are but I don't particularly want an argument, got to be up for work by 6
What's done on the battlefield is one thing, what's done in a quiet residential area is another,
I do wish you would take your revolutionary fervour elsewhere and join a jihadist group and post your experiences from Allepo or similar.
Your armchair support and justification for Assad and other murderous types gets a bit wearing
.
Also I don't think that irish republicanism can remotely be compared to islamism of the type these guys believe in, I'm not convinced that their only goal is to get everyone out of "muslim lands" or end an occupation, I think they also have a religious agenda and they use the real world stuff as a means to encourage people to buy in to that agenda.
Yeah they were cowards. Pathetic to not give the other bloke a chance cowards (immediate cowardice) , pathetic cowards who thought their life was more important than anyone elses (philosophical/theological cowardice) - wasting your life ain't brave, it's cowardice (kiddy cowardice).
I'm going to disagree with you on this. I think their agenda is to disrupt the ordinary everyday lives of those they see as ignorant to their cause. If you think Catholisism isn't a religious agenda that has caused the same kind of terrible murders of ordinary working class people as Islam I suggest you think again.
To be brave entails a risk. To you and to the people the family behind you. To make yourself a zombie is not brave. It is the most public cowardice abailible.
I agree with this. I think we have to believe what the men themselves said about their motivation. But it is possible to deplore what the UK army is doing without in any way supporting this. I have more sympathy for desperate people trapped by the actions of oppressive forces who have few options and see killing an occupying soldier as fighting back. But these two were British. They had options. Their desperation was at best vicarious.
As if it weren't tragic enough when their lives are wasted in Afghanistan...The boy was a drummer.
In your feverish anti-media posts. What would you have at the top - mung bean salad off while some polish girl gets it out a bucket.
Yeah he is a legit target. He is British Army. Butchering people in Afghanistan and elsewhere, they have a record of butchering going back hundreds of years.
I'm going to disagree with you on this. I think their agenda is to disrupt the ordinary everyday lives of those they see as ignorant to their cause. If you think Catholisism isn't a religious agenda that has caused the same kind of terrible murders of ordinary working class people as Islam I suggest you think again.
I agree. Bravery isn't not being afraid to do something. It's doing something despite being afraid.hmm, if you view bravery as some kind of philosophical or moral construct perhaps, but if you view bravery as something closer to an emotional state ie, they were shitting themselves but did it anyway then i think they could be called brave, and that bravery isn't always a good thing, which i dont think it is
What's done on the battlefield is one thing, what's done in a quiet residential area is another, I do wish you would take your revolutionary fervour elsewhere and join a jihadist group and post your experiences from Allepo or similar.
Your armchair support and justification for Assad and other murderous types gets a bit wearing.
Pay respect, he was a soldier, prepared to die on active service, not murdered in his capital city.
As if it weren't tragic enough when their lives are wasted in Afghanistan...The boy was a drummer.
Indeed, the cub scout leader, Ingrid, was certainly brave..I agree. Bravery isn't not being afraid to do something. It's doing something despite being afraid.
Demanding that others pay respect to him for being a soldier is a political position, though. I won't use that language. I feel very sorry for him and his family, but I don't see that his position as a soldier demands my respect.Pay respect, he was a soldier, prepared to die on active service, not murdered in his capital city.
I wasn't going to post this, but I used to be involved with a computer project where many migrant and refugees would use the net, etc: at the end of the day when it was time to switch off the computers, I would be shocked to see that at least once a week, a site was opened that showed decapitations, killings, etc mostly in the middle east, one even had a axe in a mans head, I don't know the provenance of the images, Jihadi or perhaps, resistance movements, but this was ten years ago and I was shaken by what I saw. I am aware that M/E TV and other channels regularly broadcast some images , but couldn't shake the feeling that for some of these people their tolerance to violence was much higher than mine and people I know.
Because I'm a twat, I watched a beheading video once, many years ago. I really wish I hadn't. This was probably about ten years ago. It might just be timing - quite a few twats like me were watching them at the time.I wasn't going to post this, but I used to be involved with a computer project where many migrant and refugees would use the net, etc: at the end of the day when it was time to switch off the computers, I would be shocked to see that at least once a week, a site was opened that showed decapitations, killings, etc mostly in the middle east, one even had a axe in a mans head, I don't know the provenance of the images, Jihadi or perhaps, resistance movements, but this was ten years ago and I was shaken by what I saw. I am aware that M/E TV and other channels regularly broadcast some images , but couldn't shake the feeling that for some of these people their tolerance to violence was much higher than mine and people I know.
The Mirror has got hold of video footage of the suspects being shot by police.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woolwich-attack-watch-shocking-video-1907772
whatever the case its quite likely these guys used those types of videos as a means of building up the mental capacity to carry the attack out .
From what they said, they certainly thought British soldiers were directly involved in fighting them. They saw themselves as part of a 'them' that war is being waged against. And they were very specific about who they wanted to kill, weren't they? Showed no sign of wanting to go after anyone random.
The Mirror has got hold of video footage of the suspects being shot by police.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woolwich-attack-watch-shocking-video-1907772
It is likely the marksmen were using newly introduced hollow-point bullets which flatten on impact for more stopping power.
Yep. This is the bit that mystifies me, too. These two weren't just produced by Islamism. They were also produced by, and entirely alienated from, British society.like how do you even get to the point where this stuff is even considered legitimate, let alone think you should do it, that's what i want to know.
Yep. This is the bit that mystifies me, too. These two weren't just produced by Islamism. They were also produced by, and entirely alienated from, British society.