Brixton Hatter
Home is south London mate
Brixton Splash is coming up soon isn't it? That'll be a good opportunity to use the space.
It's already got more people milling about than all your photos combined!^ Editor wouldn't like that either though, because it's just an expanse of windswept posh concrete-stone with no seats and people milling about instead of engaging in distinct activities.
I can see you're keen on the place, but I'm only offering my experience (and photo evidence) of what I see when I go by.But it is used. It's used plenty. There are not less people. There are more people. We must be living in different dimensions.
You're missing the point. I don't care what it's called or if it's a square or not I just want something that I think brings benefits to the community commensurate with its cost.I'm still not understanding this perception of a square - any square - as something that's used. People walk through and people sit at tables in cafes and other commercial outlets around a square, but where is all this use that's happening everywhere other than Windrush?
You're missing the point. I don't care what it's called or if it's a square or not I just want something that I think brings benefits to the community commensurate with its cost.
Do you ever sit in the square/space/park? Do you think it represents the best value and best use of the space? Do you think it makes for an attractive centrepiece for Brixton?
It's already got more people milling about than all your photos combined!
If you're happy with a space that cost a ton of money
that is barely used and has ended up with less seats, less people, less greenery and less activity than what was there before, that's fine.
Because I can recall quite hefty figures being bandied about.Just a few posts ago you asked how much it all cost! Despite this having been discussed somewhere earlier in the thread. How can you be all outraged at how much it all cost if you don't, well, know how much it cost?
It's not perception. It's a fact. There are a lot less seats in the stone area outside the Ritzy/library, and the grass areas have vanished too.It seems that most people don't share this perception.
I'd like to know if it is the same pigeons staying throughout the day, please, or different pigeons coming and going.
Also are they gentrifying pigeons from Clapham.
Will try and do a daily headcount when I go past on the bus each day. Can't guarantee accuracy but it might help this thread a bit
Would ASBOs suffice?
They need tagging but this may make me late for work!
That's, what, ten people or so? Wow.I estimated a 75% occupancy rate of the chairs at about 2045 this evening.
Spot on.Cost £7m IIRC.
Nicer definitely, but not £7m nicer.
Cost £7m IIRC.
Nicer definitely, but not £7m nicer.
Spot on.
Spot on.Would I prefer 7m spent elsewhere is probably a better question?
Sparking new Electric Avenue with new drainage, smooth surfaces and attractive Victorian canopies? A properly renovated indoor market area building on the history and providing new business opportunities? Or a much revamped Rec or leisure centre, providing health benefits.
I know it doesn't work like that, but I reckon you could have done a bodge job on the older square to provide much the same 'functionality' and spent the money more productively elsewhere. It's not bad, but it's hardly inspiring or providing new facilities other than to the Ritzy.
Spot on.
Seven million quid on the square and still no toilets.