Not really. The powers that the Scottish Parliament were going to have were not yet defined, and it could be argued never really have been. The Constitutional Convention's blueprint was not just cut and pasted into the White Paper, "Scotland's Parliament". Where the Convention's blueprint had started from the Claim of Right, the White Paper did the reverse: it listed the powers reserved for Westminster, rather than specify what powers the Scottish Parliament would have.The three choices were framed in pretty clear, easy to understand terms in that referendum though.
I'd be very careful about the "I visited there once, so I know all about how people there feel" line of deduction.
Agreed, especially as I've never made such a claim.
of course not - apart from yesterday posting "I visited the Shetlands once, a few years ago. They didn't really seem to like being part of Scotland."
You beat me.from the Express. As a mate of mine observed they probably took the poll outside an SNP rally as it broke up, but still.
You beat me.
I think it's a reputable poll, btw, Weeps.
The survey canvassed 2,019 adults, including 180 people in Scotland, using the question: “Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?”.
Ah. I missed that. Hadn't read the article fully, only heard it on the radio where they said it was 2,019 people. I see now the article says:I don't know, only 180 respondents were actually in Scotland. However I have to say among people I know the 'I'd vote yes' camp is hardening vs the 'I don't know' camp.
The survey canvassed 2,019 adults, including 180 people in Scotland
Doesn't seem reputable to me. The question is flawed and the sample is too small.
The question isn't flawed, it's the one that Salmond wants on the ballot paper. The sample of 180 is too small, though.Doesn't seem reputable to me. The question is flawed and the sample is too small.
the question is the exact wording that Salmond has said he's going to use.
What would be better?Really? I'm sure he won't get away with it.
The devolution referendum questions were:"Do you agree X should happen?" always tends to invite a response of "yes".
39% def saying no at this point - the very height of the counter-productive effect of Cameron's intervention - to me suggests a very large strong and committed no vote that has the power to win over both DKs and those who are saying yes right now due to Cameron.
That's a good point. I don't think the unionist vote should be underestimated. Independence has never gone more than about 40%; anything above that has to be soft.39% def saying no at this point - the very height of the counter-productive effect of Cameron's intervention - to me suggests a very large strong and committed no vote that has the power to win over both DKs and those who are saying yes right now due to Cameron.
The devolution referendum questions were:
I think we'll end up with something like that.
- I agree that there should be a Scottish Parliament.
I do not agree that there should be a Scottish Parliament.
It isn't a "shitty" poll, it's a poll testing the question Salmond wants asked. Where it is deficient is in only including 180 people living in Scotland.Exactly, bit different from this shitty poll which asked "Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No"
Exactly, bit different from this shitty poll which asked "Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No"
I don't know, only 180 respondents were actually in Scotland. However I have to say among people I know the 'I'd vote yes' camp is hardening vs the 'I don't know' camp.
Angus MacNeil MP says there have been 1800 new membership applications to the SNP over the last 20 days. That's rather a significant rise.