Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will you vote for independence?

Scottish independence?

  • Yes please

    Votes: 99 56.6%
  • No thanks

    Votes: 57 32.6%
  • Dont know yet

    Votes: 17 9.7%

  • Total voters
    175
enhanced-buzz-32477-1300477723-28.jpg
 
The three choices were framed in pretty clear, easy to understand terms in that referendum though.
Not really. The powers that the Scottish Parliament were going to have were not yet defined, and it could be argued never really have been. The Constitutional Convention's blueprint was not just cut and pasted into the White Paper, "Scotland's Parliament". Where the Convention's blueprint had started from the Claim of Right, the White Paper did the reverse: it listed the powers reserved for Westminster, rather than specify what powers the Scottish Parliament would have.

I remember two campaigns - a Yes Yes campaign, and a No No campaign. Despite the other option being Yes No, I remember no such campaign. Indeed, you'll remember that the campaigns were somewhat muted anyway, due to the death and funeral of Princess Di.

Once the Yes Yes verdict had been delivered in Sept 1997, the White Paper was then superseded by the Bill which became the Scotland Act. It had significant differences to the White Paper, and not just in prose style. For example, the Act and the White Paper differ significantly on the relationship between Holyrood and the EU. In some ways the act strengthened Holyrood, but you could justly say that the finished product was not seen by the public prior to their voting.

While I do not personally support Devo Max, I think it is capable of being sufficiently succinctly defined prior to an autumn 2014 vote; the idea of full fiscal autonomy is perfectly understandable. However, despite the grandees who continue to support it, there is now no major party willing to put their campaigning power behind the idea. It is perfectly possible that Salmond suspected that would happen. He may well have hoped the public would feel they aren't being given the option to vote for "Calman Plus" or anything like it, and that this may push them to support independence.
 
from the Express. As a mate of mine observed they probably took the poll outside an SNP rally as it broke up, but still.

nats.jpg
 
The survey canvassed 2,019 adults, including 180 people in Scotland, using the question: “Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?”.

Doesn't seem reputable to me. The question is flawed and the sample is too small.
 
I don't know, only 180 respondents were actually in Scotland. However I have to say among people I know the 'I'd vote yes' camp is hardening vs the 'I don't know' camp.
Ah. I missed that. Hadn't read the article fully, only heard it on the radio where they said it was 2,019 people. I see now the article says:

The survey canvassed 2,019 adults, including 180 people in Scotland

Fair enough. Treat with caution.
 
39% def saying no at this point - the very height of the counter-productive effect of Cameron's intervention - to me suggests a very large strong and committed no vote that has the power to win over both DKs and those who are saying yes right now due to Cameron.
 
"Do you agree X should happen?" always tends to invite a response of "yes".
The devolution referendum questions were:

  • I agree that there should be a Scottish Parliament.
    I do not agree that there should be a Scottish Parliament.

I think we'll end up with something like that.
 
39% def saying no at this point - the very height of the counter-productive effect of Cameron's intervention - to me suggests a very large strong and committed no vote that has the power to win over both DKs and those who are saying yes right now due to Cameron.

It's a uk-wide poll. I want to see a poll of 2000-odd people living in Scotland asked.
 
39% def saying no at this point - the very height of the counter-productive effect of Cameron's intervention - to me suggests a very large strong and committed no vote that has the power to win over both DKs and those who are saying yes right now due to Cameron.
That's a good point. I don't think the unionist vote should be underestimated. Independence has never gone more than about 40%; anything above that has to be soft.
 
The devolution referendum questions were:

  • I agree that there should be a Scottish Parliament.
    I do not agree that there should be a Scottish Parliament.
I think we'll end up with something like that.

Exactly, bit different from this shitty poll which asked "Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No"
 
Exactly, bit different from this shitty poll which asked "Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No"
It isn't a "shitty" poll, it's a poll testing the question Salmond wants asked. Where it is deficient is in only including 180 people living in Scotland.
 
Exactly, bit different from this shitty poll which asked "Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No"

I don't see it as being any different to the wording of the devolution referendum actually. 'I agree that there should be a Scottish Parliament' vs 'Do you agree that there should be a Scottish Parliament?'.
 
I don't know, only 180 respondents were actually in Scotland. However I have to say among people I know the 'I'd vote yes' camp is hardening vs the 'I don't know' camp.

So less than 10% of the overall sample then :rolleyes: Useless poll statistic yet again!
 
Angus MacNeil MP says there have been 1800 new membership applications to the SNP over the last 20 days. That's rather a significant rise.
 
I know that don't get any seats up here but isn't the Con's share of the popular vote some 15~20% in Scotland?

And if that vote can be relied on to come out for constituency races that they know they are not going to win then I'd say thats a pretty steadfast bloc for the "no" camp.

that's my insight
 
Back
Top Bottom