Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will you vote for independence?

Scottish independence?

  • Yes please

    Votes: 99 56.6%
  • No thanks

    Votes: 57 32.6%
  • Dont know yet

    Votes: 17 9.7%

  • Total voters
    175
http://news.stv.tv/scotland-decides...-yes-vote-in-unprecedented-referendum-market/

Ladbrokes spokesman Alex Donohue said: "The main story this week is that the money for Yes is surging at an unprecedented rate of over £10,000 a day made up of smaller stakes. This is an all time high and represents the momentum for Yes perfectly.

"It's unprecedented for political betting overall. This is now the biggest political betting event of all time and for there to be such a groundswell of betting support for one particular party or movement like this is unheralded."

William Hill said the £2m volume of bets it had recorded was a record for a political campaign with the placing of a £100 bet for a Yes vote in a Fife bookies.

The bookmaker now expects the betting turnover to exceed that of both the 2010 UK general election and the 2012 US presidential election combined.

Spokesman Graham Sharpe said: "The volume of betting has taken us completely by surprise and a turnover in excess of £2m was not anticipated when we began betting on the outcome.
 
... apparently, Bryan Ferry, Andrew Lloyd Webber and Cliff Richard support No. Just saying. :)

It's a mixed bag on both sides in terms of names I would be inclined to have respect or disdain for, not that I think it should be of any influence and I don't have a vote anyway.

I think the No's are a bit cheeky claiming Mike Myers (for whatever impact an American who plays a cartoon Scottish ogre would have on proceedings) - I saw the interview where he was pushed on this.
 
It's a mixed bag on both sides in terms of names I would be inclined to have respect or disdain for, not that I think it should be of any influence and I don't have a vote anyway.

I think the No's are a bit cheeky claiming Mike Myers (for whatever impact an American who plays a cartoon Scottish ogre would have on proceedings) - I saw the interview where he was pushed on this.
Aye, true, it's just that if you are a rich Englisman and have no real stake in it, you should probably keep your trap shut - and certainly not get into telling Scots how they should vote. And somehow, this seems even more the case if you are telling them to vote no.
 
I think you've every right to say what you want wherever the hell you're from, just be prepared for what may come back - and have some decorum about how you do it.

No vote = be quiet is ridiculous.
 
Aye, true, it's just that if you are a rich Englisman and have no real stake in it, you should probably keep your trap shut - and certainly not get into telling Scots how they should vote. And somehow, this seems even more the case if you are telling them to vote no.

I think the English definitely have a stake in it, just not a vote. Not that this is wrong. When a union is potentially breaking up all members are going to have a say.
 
I think the English definitely have a stake in it, just not a vote. Not that this is wrong. When a union is potentially breaking up all members are going to have a say.
Yeah, certainly - it's just the self awareness of rich slebs I'm questioning.
 
Sorry, but this is no battle. I can't argue my way out of a paper bag. I know that, so I don't try. I came to this thread to learn, not to argue. I made the same point about learning not arguing many months ago. I forget to whom. I also made the point about being very poorly treated in this thread some months ago, yet it continued. There is no one post, just the gradual accumulation.

Quartz, sure I can be rude at times, but there is a difference between asking honest questions and framing questions. It won't take me long to find them, but something along the lines of, what guarantees can I be given that I will be fine in thirty years if there is a yes vote? That is loaded as it implies you already have some guarantees (you don't, and if you do they are not defined in the question). These are standard debating tactics. It is not too bad if you acknowledge doing it after someone points it out to you, but you don't do that. You deflect.

How that can be construed as bigotry or racism is beyond me. All of this is straight out the Scottish Labour playbook. It is incredibly frustrating, and the idea that freedom of speech is stifled when folk (not just me and weepiper) get angry with it is ludicrous.
 
I havent really been following this thread, i probably should have but have they mentioned what will happen about passports, ie Im will i be able to keep my current UK one or would i have to get a new Scottish one? Please excuse my general ignorance on the situation but ive been away from Scotland for 21years now.
 
I havent really been following this thread, i probably should have but have they mentioned what will happen about passports, ie Im will i be able to keep my current UK one or would i have to get a new Scottish one? Please excuse my general ignorance on the situation but ive been away from Scotland for 21years now.
The SNP want to allow dual citizenship but I think this is the sort of thing which will get ironed out after a Yes vote.

http://www.yesscotland.net/answers/who-will-be-eligible-scottish-citizenship-independence-and-future
 
I hope you get a "yes" vote more and more now. Rather than worrying what it means for my native North-West of England, I see it more of a chance for Scots to build something better and stick it to the Tories. Who knows what would happen in England in a reformed island of Britain? Consequences are not always as obvious as they seem. Maybe Tory government wouldn't be inevitable as politics could go through a wider shake-up.
 
I hope you get a "yes" vote more and more now. Rather than worrying what it means for my native North-West of England, I see it more of a chance for Scots to build something better and stick it to the Tories. Who knows what would happen in England in a reformed island of Britain? Consequences are not always as obvious as they seem. Maybe Tory government wouldn't be inevitable as politics could go through a wider shake-up.
Yes, every bit of that. Has to be said the likelihood is to keep the Tories in power, but it will do interesting things to the Tory Party (and as you say may well have unpredictable effects anyway).
 
I agree with that. If we are honest, we will never see radical reforms in the UK. There is no working-class unity in the United Kingdom. I think that a no will create resentment between England and Scotland. It is already starting (probably more so in the south where the idea of sticking it to the Scots is gaining traction). I think in the event of a no, it will be incumbent on the English left to create some proper unity, not this fluffy Labour rhetoric while sticking it to migrants and pretending SNP/yes voters are Zanu-PF.
 
What?

"Why is Alex Salmond and the Yes campaign saying that if Scotland stays in the Union they risk a privatized NHS when the only person who can privatize the NHS is Alex Salmond?"

That doesn't make sense.
 
Six months ago I was worried that a yes vote would lead to more Tory government and an even worse situation here in northern England. But now I passionately hope for a yes vote, as I think it will have a seismic effect on England and perhaps that moment of chaos could lead to positive change. Yes, it could be worse, but it opens a window of opportunity.
 
The SNP has succeeded in attracting 30 per cent of Labour voters to its cause and Mr Miliband travelled north yesterday determined to stop further defections. He revealed that there would be visits next week from the party’s “big beasts”, including Ed Balls and John Prescott, culminating in a rally he will lead with Gordon Brown.

Ed Balls, John Prescott, Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband. If we don't vote yes after that....
 
Ed-Miliband.jpg


Jesus christ.:facepalm:
 
Back
Top Bottom