The govt claims it needs the cover of secrecy to do things that are in our best interests. What the leaks reveal is that they often need the secrecy because they are up to no good.
I don't think I've posted anything particularly controversial there, have I?
All these 'anarchist' types are busy feting the bloke and blowing smoke up his arse, but he hasn't actually done anything vaguely useful.
And you needed some leaked documents to reach that conclusion did you?
Assange has helped increased the transparency of government and allowed us as citizens see what they are actually doing in our name.
There has been a growing need of a massive 'correction' to this. Wikileaks is hopefully going to help provide it.
What a load of bollocks.
Anyone who thinks government agencies or their employees will be modifying their behaviour as a result of Wikileaks is living in fucking lala land.
Once all this has blown over, the same shit will continue. They'll just be more careful about doing it by email.
I said that 'Wikileaks will help'.
It won't.
It'll ensure that any future 'dirty-dealings' are kept well and truly under the table, not committed to electronic media and arranged in different ways.
I said that 'Wikileaks will help'. The rest is up to the rest of us.
OK, what would you suggest an appropriate course of action would be, to let people know how much they're being cunted off by their own goverments?What a load of bollocks.
Anyone who thinks government agencies or their employees will be modifying their behaviour as a result of Wikileaks is living in fucking lala land.
Once all this has blown over, the same shit will continue. They'll just be more careful about doing it by email.
What makes you think the real dirty-dealing isn't allready kept off electroninc media?
Quite it means more people are distrustful of the government and more likely to want a political alternative, that is a good thing.
.... it will highlight it to some people who previously thought that the world powers were lovely types, who have our best interest at heart.
.... pretty much all of our "leaders" are a bunch of socket cunts. But oh so many people just don't realise it. Hopefully they now do.
What a load of bollocks.
Anyone who thinks government agencies or their employees will be modifying their behaviour as a result of Wikileaks is living in fucking lala land.
Once all this has blown over, the same shit will continue. They'll just be more careful about doing it by email.
I don't think it'll change opinions one iota. Only the terminally naive will be surprised at anything that's been leaked so far.
OK, what would you suggest an appropriate course of action would be, to let people know how much they're being cunted off by their own goverments?
We need wikileaks to do what they're doing. It may not stop the problem, but it will highlight it to some people who previously thought that the world powers were lovely types, who have our best interest at heart. They can now see them for the shit covered cocksticks they really are. And we don't have to suck them off anymore. Sure, loads of people already knew this, that pretty much all of our "leaders" are a bunch of socket cunts. But oh so many people just don't realise it. Hopefully they now do. (well, those with enough brains in their heads to see past the media spin)
In the meantime though, the USA has been very seriously inconvenienced. They'll have to shift around their entire diplomatic corps for one thing.
"So far" is only a fraction of what they've got.
I don't see why that, in and of itself, is a particular service that he's done for mankind. All this just seems to be poking the Yanks with a stick. Good fun, but ultimately of little meaningful consequence!
Why?
What has come out so far that you think is game-changing as far as public opinion is concerned?
Everyone is getting cunted-off pretty evenly.
Well, if any leaks do kick start WW3, then we'll know that JA is CIA (as many have already suggested)http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/06/wikileaks-cables-nato-russia-baltics
how does this help anyone.
russia's pissed off.
So, JA is now in custody.
Will he end up in the land of the free?
He hasn't broken any US laws as far as i'm aware.
So?
Since when has that stopped the US "detaining" people - indefinitely?