Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

I've never really regarded the Guardian as left wing, faux left wing, but not really.

When you have a restaurant critic who advocates eating at place where a meal cost about a weeks worth of minimum wage, it ain't a publication for the working man. I like Jay Rayner's writing, he was a wonderful turn of phrase, but the places he reviews are expensive.
 
I've never really regarded the Guardian as left wing, faux left wing, but not really.

When you have a restaurant critic who advocates eating at place where a meal cost about a weeks worth of minimum wage, it ain't a publication for the working man. I like Jay Rayner's writing, he was a wonderful turn of phrase, but the places he reviews are expensive.
you should read grace dent's reviews
 
I've never really regarded the Guardian as left wing, faux left wing, but not really.

When you have a restaurant critic who advocates eating at place where a meal cost about a weeks worth of minimum wage, it ain't a publication for the working man. I like Jay Rayner's writing, he was a wonderful turn of phrase, but the places he reviews are expensive.
who purports it to be a socialist organ?
 
What part of 'purported' is alien to you? :)

No part. killer b 's right - in order for something to be purported, someone has to do the purporting. If you're not able to say who did the purporting you're ... er ... reporting, then it's just a mealy-mouthed way of calling the Guardian 'socialist' yourself while pretending that you're not so that you don't have to defend the claim.
 
I guess that also makes The New Statesman socialist, because he writes for that too. Also, he used to write for that well-known socialist newspaper The Independent
 

GB News: (national) socialist

Some of the rants to camera are right out of V for Vendetta. Then sometimes they have people on that well off message (Don McLean was one lovely example).
I think it’s the rants to camera that the backers are paying for, though.
 
GB News: (national) socialist

I have encountered people (not here, I don't think) who dismissed the BNP as 'left wing' - presume because of the socialist bits of their national socialist agenda (from memory, think they were pro pensions / NHS for people they considered british)
 
I've started having an allergic reaction just reading the title of Marina Hyde columns now. I thought I could avoid issues by simply not reading the columns but no.

All you need is the title, no byline necessary... e.g. "Boris Johnson has finally gone full Marie Antoinette – only he’s hogging all the cake" could only be by one person.
 
I have encountered people (not here, I don't think) who dismissed the BNP as 'left wing' - presume because of the socialist bits of their national socialist agenda (from memory, think they were pro pensions / NHS for people they considered british)

US 'Conservatives' commonly describe the Nazis as left wing.
 
Back
Top Bottom